Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data over new England

Nusrat Yussouf, David Jonathan Stensrud, S. Lakshmivarahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An ensemble of 48-h forecasts from 23 cases during the months of July and August 2002, which was created as part of a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilot program on temperature and air quality forecasting, is evaluated using a clustering method. The ensemble forecasting system consists of 23 total forecasts from four different models: the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Eta Model (ETA), the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Rapid-Update Cycle (RUC) model, and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU-NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5). Forecasts of 2-m temperature, 850-hPa u-component wind speed, 500-hPa temperature, and 250-hPa u-component wind speed are bilinearly interpolated to a common grid, and a cluster analysis is conducted at each of the 17 output times for each of the case days using a hierarchical clustering approach. Results from the clustering indicate that the forecasts largely cluster by model, with these intramodel clusters occurring quite often near the surface and less often at higher levels in the atmosphere. Results also indicate that model physics diversity plays a relatively larger role than initial condition diversity in producing distinct groupings of the forecasts. If the goal of ensemble forecasting is to have each model forecast represent an equally likely solution, then this goal remains distant as the model forecasts too often cluster based upon the model that produces the forecasts. Ensembles that contain both initial condition and model dynamics and physics uncertainty are recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2452-2462
Number of pages11
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume132
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

cluster analysis
ensemble forecasting
physics
wind velocity
forecast
temperature
prediction
air quality
atmosphere

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Yussouf, Nusrat ; Stensrud, David Jonathan ; Lakshmivarahan, S. / Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data over new England. In: Monthly Weather Review. 2004 ; Vol. 132, No. 10. pp. 2452-2462.
@article{c05bf1dc4e564de68a18e04d77d3c489,
title = "Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data over new England",
abstract = "An ensemble of 48-h forecasts from 23 cases during the months of July and August 2002, which was created as part of a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilot program on temperature and air quality forecasting, is evaluated using a clustering method. The ensemble forecasting system consists of 23 total forecasts from four different models: the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Eta Model (ETA), the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Rapid-Update Cycle (RUC) model, and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU-NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5). Forecasts of 2-m temperature, 850-hPa u-component wind speed, 500-hPa temperature, and 250-hPa u-component wind speed are bilinearly interpolated to a common grid, and a cluster analysis is conducted at each of the 17 output times for each of the case days using a hierarchical clustering approach. Results from the clustering indicate that the forecasts largely cluster by model, with these intramodel clusters occurring quite often near the surface and less often at higher levels in the atmosphere. Results also indicate that model physics diversity plays a relatively larger role than initial condition diversity in producing distinct groupings of the forecasts. If the goal of ensemble forecasting is to have each model forecast represent an equally likely solution, then this goal remains distant as the model forecasts too often cluster based upon the model that produces the forecasts. Ensembles that contain both initial condition and model dynamics and physics uncertainty are recommended.",
author = "Nusrat Yussouf and Stensrud, {David Jonathan} and S. Lakshmivarahan",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2452:CAOMED>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "2452--2462",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "10",

}

Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data over new England. / Yussouf, Nusrat; Stensrud, David Jonathan; Lakshmivarahan, S.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 132, No. 10, 01.10.2004, p. 2452-2462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cluster analysis of multimodel ensemble data over new England

AU - Yussouf, Nusrat

AU - Stensrud, David Jonathan

AU - Lakshmivarahan, S.

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - An ensemble of 48-h forecasts from 23 cases during the months of July and August 2002, which was created as part of a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilot program on temperature and air quality forecasting, is evaluated using a clustering method. The ensemble forecasting system consists of 23 total forecasts from four different models: the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Eta Model (ETA), the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Rapid-Update Cycle (RUC) model, and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU-NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5). Forecasts of 2-m temperature, 850-hPa u-component wind speed, 500-hPa temperature, and 250-hPa u-component wind speed are bilinearly interpolated to a common grid, and a cluster analysis is conducted at each of the 17 output times for each of the case days using a hierarchical clustering approach. Results from the clustering indicate that the forecasts largely cluster by model, with these intramodel clusters occurring quite often near the surface and less often at higher levels in the atmosphere. Results also indicate that model physics diversity plays a relatively larger role than initial condition diversity in producing distinct groupings of the forecasts. If the goal of ensemble forecasting is to have each model forecast represent an equally likely solution, then this goal remains distant as the model forecasts too often cluster based upon the model that produces the forecasts. Ensembles that contain both initial condition and model dynamics and physics uncertainty are recommended.

AB - An ensemble of 48-h forecasts from 23 cases during the months of July and August 2002, which was created as part of a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pilot program on temperature and air quality forecasting, is evaluated using a clustering method. The ensemble forecasting system consists of 23 total forecasts from four different models: the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Eta Model (ETA), the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM), the Rapid-Update Cycle (RUC) model, and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU-NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5). Forecasts of 2-m temperature, 850-hPa u-component wind speed, 500-hPa temperature, and 250-hPa u-component wind speed are bilinearly interpolated to a common grid, and a cluster analysis is conducted at each of the 17 output times for each of the case days using a hierarchical clustering approach. Results from the clustering indicate that the forecasts largely cluster by model, with these intramodel clusters occurring quite often near the surface and less often at higher levels in the atmosphere. Results also indicate that model physics diversity plays a relatively larger role than initial condition diversity in producing distinct groupings of the forecasts. If the goal of ensemble forecasting is to have each model forecast represent an equally likely solution, then this goal remains distant as the model forecasts too often cluster based upon the model that produces the forecasts. Ensembles that contain both initial condition and model dynamics and physics uncertainty are recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7744238612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7744238612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2452:CAOMED>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2452:CAOMED>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 2452

EP - 2462

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 10

ER -