Clustering of temperamental and cognitive risk factors for anxiety in a college sample of late adolescents

Andres G. Viana, Kim L. Gratz, Karen Linn Bierman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Temperamental vulnerabilities (e.g., behavioral inhibition, anxiety sensitivity) and cognitive biases (e.g., interpretive and judgment biases) may exacerbate feelings of stress and anxiety, particularly among late adolescents during the early years of college. The goal of the present study was to apply person-centered analyses to explore possible heterogeneity in the patterns of these four risk factors in late adolescence, and to examine associations with several anxiety outcomes (i.e., worry, anxiety symptoms, and trait anxiety). Cluster analyses in a college sample of 855 late adolescents revealed a Low-Risk group, along with four reliable clusters with distinct profiles of risk factors and anxiety outcomes (Inhibited, Sensitive, Cognitively-Biased, and Multi-Risk). Of the risk profiles, Multi-Risk youth experienced the highest levels of anxiety outcomes, whereas Inhibited youth experienced the lowest levels of anxiety outcomes. Sensitive and Cognitively-Biased youth experienced comparable levels of anxiety-related outcomes, despite different constellations of risk factors. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-430
Number of pages20
JournalAnxiety, Stress and Coping
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Cluster Analysis
Anxiety
Risk Factors
Emotions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{d3a78b8252cc4a63ab28b060fbc5ccd3,
title = "Clustering of temperamental and cognitive risk factors for anxiety in a college sample of late adolescents",
abstract = "Temperamental vulnerabilities (e.g., behavioral inhibition, anxiety sensitivity) and cognitive biases (e.g., interpretive and judgment biases) may exacerbate feelings of stress and anxiety, particularly among late adolescents during the early years of college. The goal of the present study was to apply person-centered analyses to explore possible heterogeneity in the patterns of these four risk factors in late adolescence, and to examine associations with several anxiety outcomes (i.e., worry, anxiety symptoms, and trait anxiety). Cluster analyses in a college sample of 855 late adolescents revealed a Low-Risk group, along with four reliable clusters with distinct profiles of risk factors and anxiety outcomes (Inhibited, Sensitive, Cognitively-Biased, and Multi-Risk). Of the risk profiles, Multi-Risk youth experienced the highest levels of anxiety outcomes, whereas Inhibited youth experienced the lowest levels of anxiety outcomes. Sensitive and Cognitively-Biased youth experienced comparable levels of anxiety-related outcomes, despite different constellations of risk factors. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.",
author = "Viana, {Andres G.} and Gratz, {Kim L.} and Bierman, {Karen Linn}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10615806.2012.684240",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "411--430",
journal = "Anxiety, Stress and Coping",
issn = "1061-5806",
publisher = "Brunner - Routledge (US)",
number = "4",

}

Clustering of temperamental and cognitive risk factors for anxiety in a college sample of late adolescents. / Viana, Andres G.; Gratz, Kim L.; Bierman, Karen Linn.

In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.07.2013, p. 411-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clustering of temperamental and cognitive risk factors for anxiety in a college sample of late adolescents

AU - Viana, Andres G.

AU - Gratz, Kim L.

AU - Bierman, Karen Linn

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Temperamental vulnerabilities (e.g., behavioral inhibition, anxiety sensitivity) and cognitive biases (e.g., interpretive and judgment biases) may exacerbate feelings of stress and anxiety, particularly among late adolescents during the early years of college. The goal of the present study was to apply person-centered analyses to explore possible heterogeneity in the patterns of these four risk factors in late adolescence, and to examine associations with several anxiety outcomes (i.e., worry, anxiety symptoms, and trait anxiety). Cluster analyses in a college sample of 855 late adolescents revealed a Low-Risk group, along with four reliable clusters with distinct profiles of risk factors and anxiety outcomes (Inhibited, Sensitive, Cognitively-Biased, and Multi-Risk). Of the risk profiles, Multi-Risk youth experienced the highest levels of anxiety outcomes, whereas Inhibited youth experienced the lowest levels of anxiety outcomes. Sensitive and Cognitively-Biased youth experienced comparable levels of anxiety-related outcomes, despite different constellations of risk factors. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.

AB - Temperamental vulnerabilities (e.g., behavioral inhibition, anxiety sensitivity) and cognitive biases (e.g., interpretive and judgment biases) may exacerbate feelings of stress and anxiety, particularly among late adolescents during the early years of college. The goal of the present study was to apply person-centered analyses to explore possible heterogeneity in the patterns of these four risk factors in late adolescence, and to examine associations with several anxiety outcomes (i.e., worry, anxiety symptoms, and trait anxiety). Cluster analyses in a college sample of 855 late adolescents revealed a Low-Risk group, along with four reliable clusters with distinct profiles of risk factors and anxiety outcomes (Inhibited, Sensitive, Cognitively-Biased, and Multi-Risk). Of the risk profiles, Multi-Risk youth experienced the highest levels of anxiety outcomes, whereas Inhibited youth experienced the lowest levels of anxiety outcomes. Sensitive and Cognitively-Biased youth experienced comparable levels of anxiety-related outcomes, despite different constellations of risk factors. Implications for interventions and future research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878631755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878631755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10615806.2012.684240

DO - 10.1080/10615806.2012.684240

M3 - Article

C2 - 22612321

AN - SCOPUS:84878631755

VL - 26

SP - 411

EP - 430

JO - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

JF - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

SN - 1061-5806

IS - 4

ER -