Cognitive strategies and second language writers: A re-evaluation of sentence combining

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite scant empirical evidence and questionable theoretical support, sentence-combining continues to be one of the most widely used instructional alternatives to formal grammar instruction in second language writing instruction. This study explored the cognitive strategies that second language writers engaged in during sentence-combining tasks in order to determine: 1) the cognitive demands of sentence-combining tasks, 2) if different types of sentence-combining tasks require different levels of cognitive strategies, and 3) the extent to which sentence-combining tasks require second language writers to attend to aspects of cohesion and evaluation. Nine advanced-level second language writers participated in think-aloud protocols (Ericsson & Simon, 1980, 1984) as they completed both controlled and open sentence-combining tasks. The protocols were analyzed according to the type of cognitive strategies used during sentence-combining tasks. The results showed that these second language writers engaged in restating content, constructing meaning, and higher and lower-level planning as they completed sentence-combining tasks. Between-task comparisons indicated that open sentence-combining tasks required significantly more higher-level planning than controlled sentence-combining tasks. Finally, these second language writers evaluated the appropriateness of their constructions but did not attend to aspects of cohesion during sentence-combining tasks. Relevant theoretical and pedagogical implications for second language writing instruction ore discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-75
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Second Language Writing
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

writer
language
evaluation
writing instruction
planning
Evaluation
Writer
Cognitive Strategies
Language
grammar
instruction
evidence
Writing Instruction
Cohesion
Planning
Second Language Writing
Controlled

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{f51a2845ca5148ff9a1f0b20f129aa57,
title = "Cognitive strategies and second language writers: A re-evaluation of sentence combining",
abstract = "Despite scant empirical evidence and questionable theoretical support, sentence-combining continues to be one of the most widely used instructional alternatives to formal grammar instruction in second language writing instruction. This study explored the cognitive strategies that second language writers engaged in during sentence-combining tasks in order to determine: 1) the cognitive demands of sentence-combining tasks, 2) if different types of sentence-combining tasks require different levels of cognitive strategies, and 3) the extent to which sentence-combining tasks require second language writers to attend to aspects of cohesion and evaluation. Nine advanced-level second language writers participated in think-aloud protocols (Ericsson & Simon, 1980, 1984) as they completed both controlled and open sentence-combining tasks. The protocols were analyzed according to the type of cognitive strategies used during sentence-combining tasks. The results showed that these second language writers engaged in restating content, constructing meaning, and higher and lower-level planning as they completed sentence-combining tasks. Between-task comparisons indicated that open sentence-combining tasks required significantly more higher-level planning than controlled sentence-combining tasks. Finally, these second language writers evaluated the appropriateness of their constructions but did not attend to aspects of cohesion during sentence-combining tasks. Relevant theoretical and pedagogical implications for second language writing instruction ore discussed.",
author = "Johnson, {Karen E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/1060-3743(92)90020-P",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "61--75",
journal = "Journal of Second Language Writing",
issn = "1060-3743",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Cognitive strategies and second language writers : A re-evaluation of sentence combining. / Johnson, Karen E.

In: Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 61-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive strategies and second language writers

T2 - A re-evaluation of sentence combining

AU - Johnson, Karen E.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Despite scant empirical evidence and questionable theoretical support, sentence-combining continues to be one of the most widely used instructional alternatives to formal grammar instruction in second language writing instruction. This study explored the cognitive strategies that second language writers engaged in during sentence-combining tasks in order to determine: 1) the cognitive demands of sentence-combining tasks, 2) if different types of sentence-combining tasks require different levels of cognitive strategies, and 3) the extent to which sentence-combining tasks require second language writers to attend to aspects of cohesion and evaluation. Nine advanced-level second language writers participated in think-aloud protocols (Ericsson & Simon, 1980, 1984) as they completed both controlled and open sentence-combining tasks. The protocols were analyzed according to the type of cognitive strategies used during sentence-combining tasks. The results showed that these second language writers engaged in restating content, constructing meaning, and higher and lower-level planning as they completed sentence-combining tasks. Between-task comparisons indicated that open sentence-combining tasks required significantly more higher-level planning than controlled sentence-combining tasks. Finally, these second language writers evaluated the appropriateness of their constructions but did not attend to aspects of cohesion during sentence-combining tasks. Relevant theoretical and pedagogical implications for second language writing instruction ore discussed.

AB - Despite scant empirical evidence and questionable theoretical support, sentence-combining continues to be one of the most widely used instructional alternatives to formal grammar instruction in second language writing instruction. This study explored the cognitive strategies that second language writers engaged in during sentence-combining tasks in order to determine: 1) the cognitive demands of sentence-combining tasks, 2) if different types of sentence-combining tasks require different levels of cognitive strategies, and 3) the extent to which sentence-combining tasks require second language writers to attend to aspects of cohesion and evaluation. Nine advanced-level second language writers participated in think-aloud protocols (Ericsson & Simon, 1980, 1984) as they completed both controlled and open sentence-combining tasks. The protocols were analyzed according to the type of cognitive strategies used during sentence-combining tasks. The results showed that these second language writers engaged in restating content, constructing meaning, and higher and lower-level planning as they completed sentence-combining tasks. Between-task comparisons indicated that open sentence-combining tasks required significantly more higher-level planning than controlled sentence-combining tasks. Finally, these second language writers evaluated the appropriateness of their constructions but did not attend to aspects of cohesion during sentence-combining tasks. Relevant theoretical and pedagogical implications for second language writing instruction ore discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0012013637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0012013637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90020-P

DO - 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90020-P

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0012013637

VL - 1

SP - 61

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Second Language Writing

JF - Journal of Second Language Writing

SN - 1060-3743

IS - 1

ER -