TY - JOUR
T1 - Collaborative health systems ECHO
T2 - The use of a tele-education platform to facilitate communication and collaboration with recipients of state targeted response funds in Pennsylvania
AU - Kawasaki, S.
AU - Hwang, G.
AU - Buckner, K.
AU - Francis, E.
AU - Huffnagle, S.
AU - Kraschnewski, J.
AU - Vulgamore, P.
AU - Lucas, A.
AU - Barbour, J.
AU - Crawford, M.
AU - Thomas, L.
AU - Fuller, M.
AU - Meyers, J.
AU - Swartzentruber, G.
AU - Levine, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration through grant number TI081432 and in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant TR002014. The UPMC Health Plan was supported by the SAMSHA grant number TI17017. The Pennsylvania Coordinated Medication Assisted Treatment grant awardees and Collaborative Health Systems ECHO were supported by the Pennsylvania Department of Health’s targeted response and state opioid response funding streams. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or SAMHSA. The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The opioid epidemic continues to erode communities across Pennsylvania (PA). Federal and PA state programs developed grants to establish Hub and Spoke programs for the expansion of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Employing the telementoring platform Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes), Penn State Health engaged the other seven grant awardees in a Collaborative Health Systems (CHS) ECHO. We conducted key informant interviews to better understand impact of the CHS ECHO on health systems collaboration and opioid crisis efforts. Methods: For eight one-hour sessions, each awardee presented their unique strategies, challenges, and opportunities. Using REDCap, program characteristics, such as number of waivered prescribers and number of patients served were collected at baseline. After completion of the sessions, key informant interviews were conducted to assess the impact of CHS ECHO on awardee’s programs. Results: Analysis of key informant interviews revealed important themes to address opioid crisis efforts, including the need for strategic and proactive program reevaluation and the convenience of collaborative peer learning networks. Participants expressed benefits of the CHS ECHO including allowing space for discussion of challenges and best practices and facilitating conversation on collaborative targeted advocacy and systems-level improvements. Participants further reported bolstered motivation and confidence. Conclusions: Utilizing Project ECHO provided a bidirectional platform of learning and support that created important connections between institutions working to combat the opioid epidemic. CHS ECHO was a unique opportunity for productive and convenient peer learning across external partners. Open dialogue developed during CHS ECHO can continue to direct systems-levels improvements that benefit individual and population outcomes.
AB - Background: The opioid epidemic continues to erode communities across Pennsylvania (PA). Federal and PA state programs developed grants to establish Hub and Spoke programs for the expansion of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Employing the telementoring platform Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes), Penn State Health engaged the other seven grant awardees in a Collaborative Health Systems (CHS) ECHO. We conducted key informant interviews to better understand impact of the CHS ECHO on health systems collaboration and opioid crisis efforts. Methods: For eight one-hour sessions, each awardee presented their unique strategies, challenges, and opportunities. Using REDCap, program characteristics, such as number of waivered prescribers and number of patients served were collected at baseline. After completion of the sessions, key informant interviews were conducted to assess the impact of CHS ECHO on awardee’s programs. Results: Analysis of key informant interviews revealed important themes to address opioid crisis efforts, including the need for strategic and proactive program reevaluation and the convenience of collaborative peer learning networks. Participants expressed benefits of the CHS ECHO including allowing space for discussion of challenges and best practices and facilitating conversation on collaborative targeted advocacy and systems-level improvements. Participants further reported bolstered motivation and confidence. Conclusions: Utilizing Project ECHO provided a bidirectional platform of learning and support that created important connections between institutions working to combat the opioid epidemic. CHS ECHO was a unique opportunity for productive and convenient peer learning across external partners. Open dialogue developed during CHS ECHO can continue to direct systems-levels improvements that benefit individual and population outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125154280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125154280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007519
DO - 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007519
M3 - Article
C2 - 35192446
AN - SCOPUS:85125154280
SN - 0889-7077
VL - 43
SP - 892
EP - 900
JO - Substance Abuse
JF - Substance Abuse
IS - 1
ER -