Collective Efficacy and Crime in Los Angeles Neighborhoods: Implications for the Latino Paradox

Keri B. Burchfield, Eric Silver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study (LAFANS) to examine the degree to which social ties and collective efficacy influence neighborhood levels of crime, net of neighborhood structural characteristics. Results indicate that residential instability and collective efficacy were each associated with lower log odds of robbery victimization, while social ties had a positive effect on robbery victimization. Further, collective efficacy mediated 77 percent of the association between concentrated disadvantage and robbery victimization, while social ties had no mediating effect. The mediation effect for concentrated disadvantage, however, was substantially weaker in the Latino neighborhoods (where it was 52%) than in the non-Latino neighborhoods (where it was 82%), suggesting that a "Latino paradox" may be present in which crime rates in Latino neighborhoods appear to have less to do with local levels of collective efficacy than in non-Latino neighborhoods. Implications for future research bearing on both the Latino paradox and the systemic model of social control are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154-176
Number of pages23
JournalSociological Inquiry
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

offense
victimization
crime rate
social control
mediation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{e3abe9e8305e417b90c176acd2c37170,
title = "Collective Efficacy and Crime in Los Angeles Neighborhoods: Implications for the Latino Paradox",
abstract = "We use data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study (LAFANS) to examine the degree to which social ties and collective efficacy influence neighborhood levels of crime, net of neighborhood structural characteristics. Results indicate that residential instability and collective efficacy were each associated with lower log odds of robbery victimization, while social ties had a positive effect on robbery victimization. Further, collective efficacy mediated 77 percent of the association between concentrated disadvantage and robbery victimization, while social ties had no mediating effect. The mediation effect for concentrated disadvantage, however, was substantially weaker in the Latino neighborhoods (where it was 52{\%}) than in the non-Latino neighborhoods (where it was 82{\%}), suggesting that a {"}Latino paradox{"} may be present in which crime rates in Latino neighborhoods appear to have less to do with local levels of collective efficacy than in non-Latino neighborhoods. Implications for future research bearing on both the Latino paradox and the systemic model of social control are discussed.",
author = "Burchfield, {Keri B.} and Eric Silver",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00429.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "154--176",
journal = "Sociological Inquiry",
issn = "0038-0245",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Collective Efficacy and Crime in Los Angeles Neighborhoods : Implications for the Latino Paradox. / Burchfield, Keri B.; Silver, Eric.

In: Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 83, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 154-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective Efficacy and Crime in Los Angeles Neighborhoods

T2 - Implications for the Latino Paradox

AU - Burchfield, Keri B.

AU - Silver, Eric

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - We use data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study (LAFANS) to examine the degree to which social ties and collective efficacy influence neighborhood levels of crime, net of neighborhood structural characteristics. Results indicate that residential instability and collective efficacy were each associated with lower log odds of robbery victimization, while social ties had a positive effect on robbery victimization. Further, collective efficacy mediated 77 percent of the association between concentrated disadvantage and robbery victimization, while social ties had no mediating effect. The mediation effect for concentrated disadvantage, however, was substantially weaker in the Latino neighborhoods (where it was 52%) than in the non-Latino neighborhoods (where it was 82%), suggesting that a "Latino paradox" may be present in which crime rates in Latino neighborhoods appear to have less to do with local levels of collective efficacy than in non-Latino neighborhoods. Implications for future research bearing on both the Latino paradox and the systemic model of social control are discussed.

AB - We use data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study (LAFANS) to examine the degree to which social ties and collective efficacy influence neighborhood levels of crime, net of neighborhood structural characteristics. Results indicate that residential instability and collective efficacy were each associated with lower log odds of robbery victimization, while social ties had a positive effect on robbery victimization. Further, collective efficacy mediated 77 percent of the association between concentrated disadvantage and robbery victimization, while social ties had no mediating effect. The mediation effect for concentrated disadvantage, however, was substantially weaker in the Latino neighborhoods (where it was 52%) than in the non-Latino neighborhoods (where it was 82%), suggesting that a "Latino paradox" may be present in which crime rates in Latino neighborhoods appear to have less to do with local levels of collective efficacy than in non-Latino neighborhoods. Implications for future research bearing on both the Latino paradox and the systemic model of social control are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872553492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872553492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00429.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00429.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872553492

VL - 83

SP - 154

EP - 176

JO - Sociological Inquiry

JF - Sociological Inquiry

SN - 0038-0245

IS - 1

ER -