TY - JOUR
T1 - College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge, interest, and strategy use
T2 - A study of domain learning
AU - Alexander, Patricia A.
AU - Murphy, P. Karen
AU - Woods, Bradford S.
AU - Duhon, Karen E.
AU - Parker, Dawn
PY - 1997/4
Y1 - 1997/4
N2 - Our purpose in this study was to explore changes that occurred in college students' knowledge, interests, and strategy use as a consequence of the formal instruction they received in a specific domain. This exploration is reported in three parts. Part I is a brief overview of the Model of Domain Learning - the framework upon which we based our predictions of student change. In Part II, specific changes in knowledge, interest, and strategy use of 329 undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory educational psychology course are tested and compared to predicted changes. Finally, in Part III, measures are positioned within a structural equation model allowing for a more systemic picture of the change process. Among the significant transformations we identified were increases in students' domain knowledge and in their interests in educational psychology. Also, students' use of text-based strategies (e.g., rereading) decreased while use of deeper-processing strategies (e.g., building a mental representation) increased from pretest to posttest. Formal instruction also affected the relationships between and among variables. Based on these findings, we forward implications for research design and methodology, as well as for instructional practice.
AB - Our purpose in this study was to explore changes that occurred in college students' knowledge, interests, and strategy use as a consequence of the formal instruction they received in a specific domain. This exploration is reported in three parts. Part I is a brief overview of the Model of Domain Learning - the framework upon which we based our predictions of student change. In Part II, specific changes in knowledge, interest, and strategy use of 329 undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory educational psychology course are tested and compared to predicted changes. Finally, in Part III, measures are positioned within a structural equation model allowing for a more systemic picture of the change process. Among the significant transformations we identified were increases in students' domain knowledge and in their interests in educational psychology. Also, students' use of text-based strategies (e.g., rereading) decreased while use of deeper-processing strategies (e.g., building a mental representation) increased from pretest to posttest. Formal instruction also affected the relationships between and among variables. Based on these findings, we forward implications for research design and methodology, as well as for instructional practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031120475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031120475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/ceps.1997.0927
DO - 10.1006/ceps.1997.0927
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031120475
SN - 0361-476X
VL - 22
SP - 125
EP - 146
JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology
JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology
IS - 2
ER -