Combined epidural-general anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Lina Gannam-Somri, Ibrahim Matter, Christopher Hadjittofi, Sonia Vaida, Husein Khalaily, Jalaa Hossein, Mostafa Somri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Post-operative ileus is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery in neonates undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial including 60 neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a university hospital was performed. Thirty neonates received combined epidural-general anaesthesia (CEGA), and 30 neonates received general anaesthesia (GA) alone. The primary outcome was the post-operative time to tolerance of full enteral nutrition. The secondary outcomes were the post-operative time defaecation, the duration of nasogastric drainage, and infections. Results: After excluding two neonates from the CEGA group, where repeated attempts at epidural catheterization were unsuccessful, a total of 58 patients completed the study (CEGA: 28; GA: 30). Full enteral nutrition was tolerated earlier in CEGA vs the GA group (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P =.0001). Time to defaecation was shorter in the CEGA group (3.5 vs 5.0 days; P =.0001). Duration of nasogastric drainage was similar between groups (7.0 vs 7.0 days; P =.9502). Fewer patients in the CEGA group experienced post-operative infection (35.7% vs 60.0%; P =.038). Conclusion: Combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery and a lower infection risk after gastrointestinal surgery in neonates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-40
Number of pages7
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Epidural Anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Newborn Infant
Defecation
Recovery of Function
Enteral Nutrition
Operative Time
Drainage
Infection
Ileus
Catheterization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Gannam-Somri, Lina ; Matter, Ibrahim ; Hadjittofi, Christopher ; Vaida, Sonia ; Khalaily, Husein ; Hossein, Jalaa ; Somri, Mostafa. / Combined epidural-general anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery : A randomized controlled trial. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2020 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 34-40.
@article{a9e0475d1a9441bb8901637fe24772e9,
title = "Combined epidural-general anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Post-operative ileus is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery in neonates undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial including 60 neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a university hospital was performed. Thirty neonates received combined epidural-general anaesthesia (CEGA), and 30 neonates received general anaesthesia (GA) alone. The primary outcome was the post-operative time to tolerance of full enteral nutrition. The secondary outcomes were the post-operative time defaecation, the duration of nasogastric drainage, and infections. Results: After excluding two neonates from the CEGA group, where repeated attempts at epidural catheterization were unsuccessful, a total of 58 patients completed the study (CEGA: 28; GA: 30). Full enteral nutrition was tolerated earlier in CEGA vs the GA group (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P =.0001). Time to defaecation was shorter in the CEGA group (3.5 vs 5.0 days; P =.0001). Duration of nasogastric drainage was similar between groups (7.0 vs 7.0 days; P =.9502). Fewer patients in the CEGA group experienced post-operative infection (35.7{\%} vs 60.0{\%}; P =.038). Conclusion: Combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery and a lower infection risk after gastrointestinal surgery in neonates.",
author = "Lina Gannam-Somri and Ibrahim Matter and Christopher Hadjittofi and Sonia Vaida and Husein Khalaily and Jalaa Hossein and Mostafa Somri",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/aas.13469",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "34--40",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

Combined epidural-general anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery : A randomized controlled trial. / Gannam-Somri, Lina; Matter, Ibrahim; Hadjittofi, Christopher; Vaida, Sonia; Khalaily, Husein; Hossein, Jalaa; Somri, Mostafa.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 34-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combined epidural-general anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Gannam-Somri, Lina

AU - Matter, Ibrahim

AU - Hadjittofi, Christopher

AU - Vaida, Sonia

AU - Khalaily, Husein

AU - Hossein, Jalaa

AU - Somri, Mostafa

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Background: Post-operative ileus is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery in neonates undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial including 60 neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a university hospital was performed. Thirty neonates received combined epidural-general anaesthesia (CEGA), and 30 neonates received general anaesthesia (GA) alone. The primary outcome was the post-operative time to tolerance of full enteral nutrition. The secondary outcomes were the post-operative time defaecation, the duration of nasogastric drainage, and infections. Results: After excluding two neonates from the CEGA group, where repeated attempts at epidural catheterization were unsuccessful, a total of 58 patients completed the study (CEGA: 28; GA: 30). Full enteral nutrition was tolerated earlier in CEGA vs the GA group (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P =.0001). Time to defaecation was shorter in the CEGA group (3.5 vs 5.0 days; P =.0001). Duration of nasogastric drainage was similar between groups (7.0 vs 7.0 days; P =.9502). Fewer patients in the CEGA group experienced post-operative infection (35.7% vs 60.0%; P =.038). Conclusion: Combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery and a lower infection risk after gastrointestinal surgery in neonates.

AB - Background: Post-operative ileus is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery in neonates undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial including 60 neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a university hospital was performed. Thirty neonates received combined epidural-general anaesthesia (CEGA), and 30 neonates received general anaesthesia (GA) alone. The primary outcome was the post-operative time to tolerance of full enteral nutrition. The secondary outcomes were the post-operative time defaecation, the duration of nasogastric drainage, and infections. Results: After excluding two neonates from the CEGA group, where repeated attempts at epidural catheterization were unsuccessful, a total of 58 patients completed the study (CEGA: 28; GA: 30). Full enteral nutrition was tolerated earlier in CEGA vs the GA group (4.0 vs 8.0 days; P =.0001). Time to defaecation was shorter in the CEGA group (3.5 vs 5.0 days; P =.0001). Duration of nasogastric drainage was similar between groups (7.0 vs 7.0 days; P =.9502). Fewer patients in the CEGA group experienced post-operative infection (35.7% vs 60.0%; P =.038). Conclusion: Combined epidural-general anaesthesia is associated with expedited gastrointestinal function recovery and a lower infection risk after gastrointestinal surgery in neonates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073981186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073981186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/aas.13469

DO - 10.1111/aas.13469

M3 - Article

C2 - 31506919

AN - SCOPUS:85073981186

VL - 64

SP - 34

EP - 40

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 1

ER -