Combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction does not increase quadriceps EMG activity

J. Hertel, J. E. Earl, K. K.W. Tsang, S. J. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the combined isometric contractions of knee extension/hip adduction and knee extension/hip abduction will elicit a different quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic (EMG) pattern as compared to isometric contraction of a uniplanar knee extension exercise. Methods: Eight healthy young adult volunteers without history of knee or quadriceps injury participated. Surface EMG data were collected from the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), and gluteus medius (Gmed) muscles of the dominant leg of each subject during three single leg, weight bearing, isometric exercises (uniplanar knee extension, knee extension/hip adduction, knee extension/hip abduction). All exercises were performed at a position of 60° knee flexion. Three trials lasting 5 s each were performed for each of the three exercises. EMG data from each muscle were integrated and the maximum root mean square activity over a 0.5 s window for each trial was averaged. Analyses of variance were performed with exercise (straight extension, extension/adduction, extension/abduction) as the independent variable and VMO, VL, and Gmed activity and VMO:VL ratio as dependent variables. Results: A significant main effect for exercise was found for the VMO (p=0.006) and VL (p=0.02), but not the Gmed (p=0.25) or the VMO:VL ratio (p=0.13). For the VMO and VL, the uniplanar knee extension task produced significantly more EMG activity than the extension/adduction or extension/abduction tasks. Conclusions: Uniplanar knee extension exercises may be more appropriate than combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction when eliciting maximal VMO and VL contractions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-213
Number of pages4
JournalBritish journal of sports medicine
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2004

Fingerprint

Quadriceps Muscle
Hip
Knee
Exercise
Isometric Contraction
Leg
Muscles
Weight-Bearing
Young Adult
Volunteers
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{bef82dddc3764b1889c9354d5a2e3456,
title = "Combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction does not increase quadriceps EMG activity",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if the combined isometric contractions of knee extension/hip adduction and knee extension/hip abduction will elicit a different quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic (EMG) pattern as compared to isometric contraction of a uniplanar knee extension exercise. Methods: Eight healthy young adult volunteers without history of knee or quadriceps injury participated. Surface EMG data were collected from the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), and gluteus medius (Gmed) muscles of the dominant leg of each subject during three single leg, weight bearing, isometric exercises (uniplanar knee extension, knee extension/hip adduction, knee extension/hip abduction). All exercises were performed at a position of 60° knee flexion. Three trials lasting 5 s each were performed for each of the three exercises. EMG data from each muscle were integrated and the maximum root mean square activity over a 0.5 s window for each trial was averaged. Analyses of variance were performed with exercise (straight extension, extension/adduction, extension/abduction) as the independent variable and VMO, VL, and Gmed activity and VMO:VL ratio as dependent variables. Results: A significant main effect for exercise was found for the VMO (p=0.006) and VL (p=0.02), but not the Gmed (p=0.25) or the VMO:VL ratio (p=0.13). For the VMO and VL, the uniplanar knee extension task produced significantly more EMG activity than the extension/adduction or extension/abduction tasks. Conclusions: Uniplanar knee extension exercises may be more appropriate than combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction when eliciting maximal VMO and VL contractions.",
author = "J. Hertel and Earl, {J. E.} and Tsang, {K. K.W.} and Miller, {S. J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjsm.2002.003277",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "210--213",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

Combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction does not increase quadriceps EMG activity. / Hertel, J.; Earl, J. E.; Tsang, K. K.W.; Miller, S. J.

In: British journal of sports medicine, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.04.2004, p. 210-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction does not increase quadriceps EMG activity

AU - Hertel, J.

AU - Earl, J. E.

AU - Tsang, K. K.W.

AU - Miller, S. J.

PY - 2004/4/1

Y1 - 2004/4/1

N2 - Objective: To determine if the combined isometric contractions of knee extension/hip adduction and knee extension/hip abduction will elicit a different quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic (EMG) pattern as compared to isometric contraction of a uniplanar knee extension exercise. Methods: Eight healthy young adult volunteers without history of knee or quadriceps injury participated. Surface EMG data were collected from the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), and gluteus medius (Gmed) muscles of the dominant leg of each subject during three single leg, weight bearing, isometric exercises (uniplanar knee extension, knee extension/hip adduction, knee extension/hip abduction). All exercises were performed at a position of 60° knee flexion. Three trials lasting 5 s each were performed for each of the three exercises. EMG data from each muscle were integrated and the maximum root mean square activity over a 0.5 s window for each trial was averaged. Analyses of variance were performed with exercise (straight extension, extension/adduction, extension/abduction) as the independent variable and VMO, VL, and Gmed activity and VMO:VL ratio as dependent variables. Results: A significant main effect for exercise was found for the VMO (p=0.006) and VL (p=0.02), but not the Gmed (p=0.25) or the VMO:VL ratio (p=0.13). For the VMO and VL, the uniplanar knee extension task produced significantly more EMG activity than the extension/adduction or extension/abduction tasks. Conclusions: Uniplanar knee extension exercises may be more appropriate than combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction when eliciting maximal VMO and VL contractions.

AB - Objective: To determine if the combined isometric contractions of knee extension/hip adduction and knee extension/hip abduction will elicit a different quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic (EMG) pattern as compared to isometric contraction of a uniplanar knee extension exercise. Methods: Eight healthy young adult volunteers without history of knee or quadriceps injury participated. Surface EMG data were collected from the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), and gluteus medius (Gmed) muscles of the dominant leg of each subject during three single leg, weight bearing, isometric exercises (uniplanar knee extension, knee extension/hip adduction, knee extension/hip abduction). All exercises were performed at a position of 60° knee flexion. Three trials lasting 5 s each were performed for each of the three exercises. EMG data from each muscle were integrated and the maximum root mean square activity over a 0.5 s window for each trial was averaged. Analyses of variance were performed with exercise (straight extension, extension/adduction, extension/abduction) as the independent variable and VMO, VL, and Gmed activity and VMO:VL ratio as dependent variables. Results: A significant main effect for exercise was found for the VMO (p=0.006) and VL (p=0.02), but not the Gmed (p=0.25) or the VMO:VL ratio (p=0.13). For the VMO and VL, the uniplanar knee extension task produced significantly more EMG activity than the extension/adduction or extension/abduction tasks. Conclusions: Uniplanar knee extension exercises may be more appropriate than combining isometric knee extension exercises with hip adduction or abduction when eliciting maximal VMO and VL contractions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842559589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842559589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2002.003277

DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2002.003277

M3 - Article

C2 - 15039261

AN - SCOPUS:1842559589

VL - 38

SP - 210

EP - 213

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 2

ER -