Comment on: "root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar"

Yuan Wu, Li Guo, Wentao Li, Xihong Cui, Jin Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: In a recent paper, Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) reported a considerable impact of root orientation on the accuracy of root detection and root diameter estimation by ground-penetrating radar (GPR).Methods: In Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013), buried root samples in a sand box were scanned from multiple cross angles between root orientation and GPR transecting line under controlled conditions. Changes in radar waveform parameter of roots to different cross angles were investigated.Results: Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) clarified that 1) the variation in amplitude area (a signal strength related waveform parameter) to different cross angles fitted a sinusoidal waveform; and 2) the impact of root orientation on root diameter estimation by GPR could be mathematically corrected by applying a grid transect survey. However, we found that the quantitative relationship established in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) between amplitude area and cross angle was incorrect, and the application of a grid transect survey still underestimated root diameter.Conclusion: The change in amplitude area to cross angle between transecting line and root orientation fits a sinusoidal waveform but different to that reported in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013). The polarization of GPR wave may explain such sinusoidal variation in amplitude area to cross angle. The effect of root orientation on GPR-based root diameter estimation remains to be calibrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-444
Number of pages4
JournalPlant and Soil
Volume380
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

ground-penetrating radar
ground penetrating radar
soil
soil-plant interactions
radar
detection
transect
sand

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Wu, Yuan ; Guo, Li ; Li, Wentao ; Cui, Xihong ; Chen, Jin. / Comment on : "root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar". In: Plant and Soil. 2014 ; Vol. 380, No. 1. pp. 441-444.
@article{ef48449e31eb4336a2c3dca2e891f90f,
title = "Comment on: {"}root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar{"}",
abstract = "Introduction: In a recent paper, Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) reported a considerable impact of root orientation on the accuracy of root detection and root diameter estimation by ground-penetrating radar (GPR).Methods: In Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013), buried root samples in a sand box were scanned from multiple cross angles between root orientation and GPR transecting line under controlled conditions. Changes in radar waveform parameter of roots to different cross angles were investigated.Results: Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) clarified that 1) the variation in amplitude area (a signal strength related waveform parameter) to different cross angles fitted a sinusoidal waveform; and 2) the impact of root orientation on root diameter estimation by GPR could be mathematically corrected by applying a grid transect survey. However, we found that the quantitative relationship established in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) between amplitude area and cross angle was incorrect, and the application of a grid transect survey still underestimated root diameter.Conclusion: The change in amplitude area to cross angle between transecting line and root orientation fits a sinusoidal waveform but different to that reported in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013). The polarization of GPR wave may explain such sinusoidal variation in amplitude area to cross angle. The effect of root orientation on GPR-based root diameter estimation remains to be calibrated.",
author = "Yuan Wu and Li Guo and Wentao Li and Xihong Cui and Jin Chen",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11104-014-2124-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "380",
pages = "441--444",
journal = "Plant and Soil",
issn = "0032-079X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Comment on : "root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar". / Wu, Yuan; Guo, Li; Li, Wentao; Cui, Xihong; Chen, Jin.

In: Plant and Soil, Vol. 380, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 441-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on

T2 - "root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar"

AU - Wu, Yuan

AU - Guo, Li

AU - Li, Wentao

AU - Cui, Xihong

AU - Chen, Jin

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Introduction: In a recent paper, Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) reported a considerable impact of root orientation on the accuracy of root detection and root diameter estimation by ground-penetrating radar (GPR).Methods: In Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013), buried root samples in a sand box were scanned from multiple cross angles between root orientation and GPR transecting line under controlled conditions. Changes in radar waveform parameter of roots to different cross angles were investigated.Results: Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) clarified that 1) the variation in amplitude area (a signal strength related waveform parameter) to different cross angles fitted a sinusoidal waveform; and 2) the impact of root orientation on root diameter estimation by GPR could be mathematically corrected by applying a grid transect survey. However, we found that the quantitative relationship established in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) between amplitude area and cross angle was incorrect, and the application of a grid transect survey still underestimated root diameter.Conclusion: The change in amplitude area to cross angle between transecting line and root orientation fits a sinusoidal waveform but different to that reported in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013). The polarization of GPR wave may explain such sinusoidal variation in amplitude area to cross angle. The effect of root orientation on GPR-based root diameter estimation remains to be calibrated.

AB - Introduction: In a recent paper, Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) reported a considerable impact of root orientation on the accuracy of root detection and root diameter estimation by ground-penetrating radar (GPR).Methods: In Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013), buried root samples in a sand box were scanned from multiple cross angles between root orientation and GPR transecting line under controlled conditions. Changes in radar waveform parameter of roots to different cross angles were investigated.Results: Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) clarified that 1) the variation in amplitude area (a signal strength related waveform parameter) to different cross angles fitted a sinusoidal waveform; and 2) the impact of root orientation on root diameter estimation by GPR could be mathematically corrected by applying a grid transect survey. However, we found that the quantitative relationship established in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013) between amplitude area and cross angle was incorrect, and the application of a grid transect survey still underestimated root diameter.Conclusion: The change in amplitude area to cross angle between transecting line and root orientation fits a sinusoidal waveform but different to that reported in Tanikawa et al. Plant Soil 373:317-327, (2013). The polarization of GPR wave may explain such sinusoidal variation in amplitude area to cross angle. The effect of root orientation on GPR-based root diameter estimation remains to be calibrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903526856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903526856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11104-014-2124-7

DO - 10.1007/s11104-014-2124-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84903526856

VL - 380

SP - 441

EP - 444

JO - Plant and Soil

JF - Plant and Soil

SN - 0032-079X

IS - 1

ER -