Commentary on latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis for characterizing individual differences in learning

Bethany Cara Bray, John Dziak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The collection of articles in this special issue focus on latent variable mixture models including latent class analysis (LCA), latent profile analysis (LPA), and latent transition analysis (LTA). These are all methods for summarizing observed variables by postulating an underlying categorical latent variable representing a type or status; in the case of LTA, the status of an individual may change over time and the pathways of change are of interest. As the introductory article by Hickendorff, Edelsbrunner, McMullen, Schneider, and Trezise points out, these methods are useful when theory suggests that a learning or problem-solving process can occur in distinct modes or phases. They can also be useful when it is desirable to give qualitative descriptions of individuals’ approaches to a task based on their responses across several variables rather than just simple numerical scores. The articles in this special issue use latent variable mixture models in creative and insightful ways, demonstrating their versatility and practicality. However, some challenges remain for researchers using these methods. A number of exciting future directions remain for quantitative methodologists and applied researchers to work together to address new questions in learning and individual differences research. Latent variable mixture modeling will continue to be a powerful tool learning researchers can use to address the critical, sophisticated, theoretically based research questions facing the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-110
Number of pages6
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Research Personnel
Learning
learning
Research
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{97a30a29a70141d0aa15b8d17c5cf17d,
title = "Commentary on latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis for characterizing individual differences in learning",
abstract = "The collection of articles in this special issue focus on latent variable mixture models including latent class analysis (LCA), latent profile analysis (LPA), and latent transition analysis (LTA). These are all methods for summarizing observed variables by postulating an underlying categorical latent variable representing a type or status; in the case of LTA, the status of an individual may change over time and the pathways of change are of interest. As the introductory article by Hickendorff, Edelsbrunner, McMullen, Schneider, and Trezise points out, these methods are useful when theory suggests that a learning or problem-solving process can occur in distinct modes or phases. They can also be useful when it is desirable to give qualitative descriptions of individuals’ approaches to a task based on their responses across several variables rather than just simple numerical scores. The articles in this special issue use latent variable mixture models in creative and insightful ways, demonstrating their versatility and practicality. However, some challenges remain for researchers using these methods. A number of exciting future directions remain for quantitative methodologists and applied researchers to work together to address new questions in learning and individual differences research. Latent variable mixture modeling will continue to be a powerful tool learning researchers can use to address the critical, sophisticated, theoretically based research questions facing the field.",
author = "Bray, {Bethany Cara} and John Dziak",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "105--110",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis for characterizing individual differences in learning

AU - Bray, Bethany Cara

AU - Dziak, John

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - The collection of articles in this special issue focus on latent variable mixture models including latent class analysis (LCA), latent profile analysis (LPA), and latent transition analysis (LTA). These are all methods for summarizing observed variables by postulating an underlying categorical latent variable representing a type or status; in the case of LTA, the status of an individual may change over time and the pathways of change are of interest. As the introductory article by Hickendorff, Edelsbrunner, McMullen, Schneider, and Trezise points out, these methods are useful when theory suggests that a learning or problem-solving process can occur in distinct modes or phases. They can also be useful when it is desirable to give qualitative descriptions of individuals’ approaches to a task based on their responses across several variables rather than just simple numerical scores. The articles in this special issue use latent variable mixture models in creative and insightful ways, demonstrating their versatility and practicality. However, some challenges remain for researchers using these methods. A number of exciting future directions remain for quantitative methodologists and applied researchers to work together to address new questions in learning and individual differences research. Latent variable mixture modeling will continue to be a powerful tool learning researchers can use to address the critical, sophisticated, theoretically based research questions facing the field.

AB - The collection of articles in this special issue focus on latent variable mixture models including latent class analysis (LCA), latent profile analysis (LPA), and latent transition analysis (LTA). These are all methods for summarizing observed variables by postulating an underlying categorical latent variable representing a type or status; in the case of LTA, the status of an individual may change over time and the pathways of change are of interest. As the introductory article by Hickendorff, Edelsbrunner, McMullen, Schneider, and Trezise points out, these methods are useful when theory suggests that a learning or problem-solving process can occur in distinct modes or phases. They can also be useful when it is desirable to give qualitative descriptions of individuals’ approaches to a task based on their responses across several variables rather than just simple numerical scores. The articles in this special issue use latent variable mixture models in creative and insightful ways, demonstrating their versatility and practicality. However, some challenges remain for researchers using these methods. A number of exciting future directions remain for quantitative methodologists and applied researchers to work together to address new questions in learning and individual differences research. Latent variable mixture modeling will continue to be a powerful tool learning researchers can use to address the critical, sophisticated, theoretically based research questions facing the field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048431017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048431017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048431017

VL - 66

SP - 105

EP - 110

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

ER -