Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas

Leland Luther Glenna, Rick Welsh, David Ervin, William B. Lacy, Dina Biscotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policies designed to promote the commercialization of university science have provoked concern that basic and publicly accessible research may be neglected. Commercialization policies have altered traditional institutional incentives and constraints, which raises new questions regarding the influence of scientists' values on university research agendas. Our research builds on previous quantitative studies measuring changes in research outcomes and qualitative studies probing differentiation among scientists' value orientations. We developed a nation-wide survey of 912 plant and animal biotechnology scientists at 60 research universities. Our analysis reveals that scientists' value orientations on what we classify as "market" and "expert" science affect the amount of industry funding they receive, the proprietary nature of their discoveries, and the percentage of basic science research conducted in their laboratories. We also find that the percentage of industry funding is significantly associated with more applied research. Our findings provide insights for science and society theory and suggest that strong incentives for public-science research along with adequate public-research funds to preserve the university's vital role in conducting basic and non-proprietary research are needed to complement private-sector research investments at universities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-968
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Policy
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Biotechnology
Research agenda
Industry
Animals
Value orientations
University research
Funding
Incentives
Commercialization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Glenna, Leland Luther ; Welsh, Rick ; Ervin, David ; Lacy, William B. ; Biscotti, Dina. / Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas. In: Research Policy. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 7. pp. 957-968.
@article{66850debc2434b77b4de585e3ac36bc4,
title = "Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas",
abstract = "Policies designed to promote the commercialization of university science have provoked concern that basic and publicly accessible research may be neglected. Commercialization policies have altered traditional institutional incentives and constraints, which raises new questions regarding the influence of scientists' values on university research agendas. Our research builds on previous quantitative studies measuring changes in research outcomes and qualitative studies probing differentiation among scientists' value orientations. We developed a nation-wide survey of 912 plant and animal biotechnology scientists at 60 research universities. Our analysis reveals that scientists' value orientations on what we classify as {"}market{"} and {"}expert{"} science affect the amount of industry funding they receive, the proprietary nature of their discoveries, and the percentage of basic science research conducted in their laboratories. We also find that the percentage of industry funding is significantly associated with more applied research. Our findings provide insights for science and society theory and suggest that strong incentives for public-science research along with adequate public-research funds to preserve the university's vital role in conducting basic and non-proprietary research are needed to complement private-sector research investments at universities.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Rick Welsh and David Ervin and Lacy, {William B.} and Dina Biscotti",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "957--968",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas. / Glenna, Leland Luther; Welsh, Rick; Ervin, David; Lacy, William B.; Biscotti, Dina.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.09.2011, p. 957-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Welsh, Rick

AU - Ervin, David

AU - Lacy, William B.

AU - Biscotti, Dina

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Policies designed to promote the commercialization of university science have provoked concern that basic and publicly accessible research may be neglected. Commercialization policies have altered traditional institutional incentives and constraints, which raises new questions regarding the influence of scientists' values on university research agendas. Our research builds on previous quantitative studies measuring changes in research outcomes and qualitative studies probing differentiation among scientists' value orientations. We developed a nation-wide survey of 912 plant and animal biotechnology scientists at 60 research universities. Our analysis reveals that scientists' value orientations on what we classify as "market" and "expert" science affect the amount of industry funding they receive, the proprietary nature of their discoveries, and the percentage of basic science research conducted in their laboratories. We also find that the percentage of industry funding is significantly associated with more applied research. Our findings provide insights for science and society theory and suggest that strong incentives for public-science research along with adequate public-research funds to preserve the university's vital role in conducting basic and non-proprietary research are needed to complement private-sector research investments at universities.

AB - Policies designed to promote the commercialization of university science have provoked concern that basic and publicly accessible research may be neglected. Commercialization policies have altered traditional institutional incentives and constraints, which raises new questions regarding the influence of scientists' values on university research agendas. Our research builds on previous quantitative studies measuring changes in research outcomes and qualitative studies probing differentiation among scientists' value orientations. We developed a nation-wide survey of 912 plant and animal biotechnology scientists at 60 research universities. Our analysis reveals that scientists' value orientations on what we classify as "market" and "expert" science affect the amount of industry funding they receive, the proprietary nature of their discoveries, and the percentage of basic science research conducted in their laboratories. We also find that the percentage of industry funding is significantly associated with more applied research. Our findings provide insights for science and society theory and suggest that strong incentives for public-science research along with adequate public-research funds to preserve the university's vital role in conducting basic and non-proprietary research are needed to complement private-sector research investments at universities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961027944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961027944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 957

EP - 968

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 7

ER -