Communicating risk information at criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania: An experimental analysis

R. Barry Ruback, Cynthia A. Kempinen, Leigh A. Tinik, Lauren K. Knoth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This experimental study examined whether actuarial risk information affects decision makers' judgments about recidivism risk, whether the type of presentation makes a difference in judged risk, and whether there are differences in judged risk depending on type of crime. In the study, participants (judges, attorneys, and probation officers in four counties of Pennsylvania) received the actuarial risk score of six offenders in one of three formats, along with the meaning of that score in terms of risk of rearrest within three years. Participants then rated recidivism risk before and after receiving the information. Results indicated that the actuarial risk information significantly reduced risk judgments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalFederal Probation
Volume80
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

probation officer
Lawyers
Crime
decision maker
offender
offense

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Ruback, R. Barry ; Kempinen, Cynthia A. ; Tinik, Leigh A. ; Knoth, Lauren K. / Communicating risk information at criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania : An experimental analysis. In: Federal Probation. 2016 ; Vol. 80, No. 2. pp. 47-56.
@article{a9b1adacad3d4a229037881aed0479c8,
title = "Communicating risk information at criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania: An experimental analysis",
abstract = "This experimental study examined whether actuarial risk information affects decision makers' judgments about recidivism risk, whether the type of presentation makes a difference in judged risk, and whether there are differences in judged risk depending on type of crime. In the study, participants (judges, attorneys, and probation officers in four counties of Pennsylvania) received the actuarial risk score of six offenders in one of three formats, along with the meaning of that score in terms of risk of rearrest within three years. Participants then rated recidivism risk before and after receiving the information. Results indicated that the actuarial risk information significantly reduced risk judgments.",
author = "Ruback, {R. Barry} and Kempinen, {Cynthia A.} and Tinik, {Leigh A.} and Knoth, {Lauren K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "Federal Probation",
issn = "0014-9128",
publisher = "Administrative Office of the United States Courts",
number = "2",

}

Communicating risk information at criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania : An experimental analysis. / Ruback, R. Barry; Kempinen, Cynthia A.; Tinik, Leigh A.; Knoth, Lauren K.

In: Federal Probation, Vol. 80, No. 2, 09.2016, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating risk information at criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania

T2 - An experimental analysis

AU - Ruback, R. Barry

AU - Kempinen, Cynthia A.

AU - Tinik, Leigh A.

AU - Knoth, Lauren K.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - This experimental study examined whether actuarial risk information affects decision makers' judgments about recidivism risk, whether the type of presentation makes a difference in judged risk, and whether there are differences in judged risk depending on type of crime. In the study, participants (judges, attorneys, and probation officers in four counties of Pennsylvania) received the actuarial risk score of six offenders in one of three formats, along with the meaning of that score in terms of risk of rearrest within three years. Participants then rated recidivism risk before and after receiving the information. Results indicated that the actuarial risk information significantly reduced risk judgments.

AB - This experimental study examined whether actuarial risk information affects decision makers' judgments about recidivism risk, whether the type of presentation makes a difference in judged risk, and whether there are differences in judged risk depending on type of crime. In the study, participants (judges, attorneys, and probation officers in four counties of Pennsylvania) received the actuarial risk score of six offenders in one of three formats, along with the meaning of that score in terms of risk of rearrest within three years. Participants then rated recidivism risk before and after receiving the information. Results indicated that the actuarial risk information significantly reduced risk judgments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010756630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010756630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010756630

VL - 80

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - Federal Probation

JF - Federal Probation

SN - 0014-9128

IS - 2

ER -