Abstract
This article presents a follow-up study to Lee, van Dulm, Robb, and Ormond (2015). The aim was to explore communication restriction in adults with stuttering (AWS) using typical language measures and systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analyses. The article compared the pre- and post-treatment performance of AWS in language productivity and complexity, transitivity, modality, appraisal, and theme. Ten-minute conversational samples were obtained from 20 AWS before and after participation in intensive stuttering treatment. Transcripts were analysed for quantity and complexity of verbal output, and frequency of transitivity, modality, appraisal and theme resources. Between pre- and post-treatment, the following differences were observed: (1) a significant increase in frequency of modal operators, and trends approaching significance for (2) increased language complexity (3) increased language expressing appraisal. These changes suggest increased flexibility of language use in AWS following treatment, particularly towards interpersonal engagement. The value of SFL to this area of research is discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 546-567 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2 2016 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Speech and Hearing
Cite this
}
Communication restriction in adults who stutter : Part II. / Lee, Amanda; Robb, Michael; van Dulm, Ondene; Ormond, Tika.
In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, Vol. 30, No. 7, 02.07.2016, p. 546-567.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication restriction in adults who stutter
T2 - Part II
AU - Lee, Amanda
AU - Robb, Michael
AU - van Dulm, Ondene
AU - Ormond, Tika
PY - 2016/7/2
Y1 - 2016/7/2
N2 - This article presents a follow-up study to Lee, van Dulm, Robb, and Ormond (2015). The aim was to explore communication restriction in adults with stuttering (AWS) using typical language measures and systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analyses. The article compared the pre- and post-treatment performance of AWS in language productivity and complexity, transitivity, modality, appraisal, and theme. Ten-minute conversational samples were obtained from 20 AWS before and after participation in intensive stuttering treatment. Transcripts were analysed for quantity and complexity of verbal output, and frequency of transitivity, modality, appraisal and theme resources. Between pre- and post-treatment, the following differences were observed: (1) a significant increase in frequency of modal operators, and trends approaching significance for (2) increased language complexity (3) increased language expressing appraisal. These changes suggest increased flexibility of language use in AWS following treatment, particularly towards interpersonal engagement. The value of SFL to this area of research is discussed.
AB - This article presents a follow-up study to Lee, van Dulm, Robb, and Ormond (2015). The aim was to explore communication restriction in adults with stuttering (AWS) using typical language measures and systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analyses. The article compared the pre- and post-treatment performance of AWS in language productivity and complexity, transitivity, modality, appraisal, and theme. Ten-minute conversational samples were obtained from 20 AWS before and after participation in intensive stuttering treatment. Transcripts were analysed for quantity and complexity of verbal output, and frequency of transitivity, modality, appraisal and theme resources. Between pre- and post-treatment, the following differences were observed: (1) a significant increase in frequency of modal operators, and trends approaching significance for (2) increased language complexity (3) increased language expressing appraisal. These changes suggest increased flexibility of language use in AWS following treatment, particularly towards interpersonal engagement. The value of SFL to this area of research is discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964048541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964048541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/02699206.2016.1151939
DO - 10.3109/02699206.2016.1151939
M3 - Article
C2 - 27050117
AN - SCOPUS:84964048541
VL - 30
SP - 546
EP - 567
JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
SN - 0269-9206
IS - 7
ER -