Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1989, Light defined communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and sufficiency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifically, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this definition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is influenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confidence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this definition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been significant changes in the AAC field. In this paper, we review the preliminary definition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the field, and then revisit the proposed definition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalAAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Communication
Linguistics
Light
Motivation
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{cd2b1ebb47fc406686827c890dcb9d4d,
title = "Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication?",
abstract = "In 1989, Light defined communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and sufficiency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifically, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this definition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is influenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confidence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this definition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been significant changes in the AAC field. In this paper, we review the preliminary definition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the field, and then revisit the proposed definition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.",
author = "Janice Light and David McNaughton",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/07434618.2014.885080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication",
issn = "0743-4618",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication

T2 - A new definition for a new era of communication?

AU - Light, Janice

AU - McNaughton, David

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - In 1989, Light defined communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and sufficiency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifically, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this definition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is influenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confidence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this definition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been significant changes in the AAC field. In this paper, we review the preliminary definition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the field, and then revisit the proposed definition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.

AB - In 1989, Light defined communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and sufficiency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifically, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this definition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is influenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confidence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this definition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been significant changes in the AAC field. In this paper, we review the preliminary definition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the field, and then revisit the proposed definition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900674183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900674183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/07434618.2014.885080

DO - 10.3109/07434618.2014.885080

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84900674183

VL - 30

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

JF - AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

SN - 0743-4618

IS - 1

ER -