Communicative Rationality, Strategy, and Intersubjectivity

Results From a Quasi-Experimental Investigation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article presents some results from an investigation of the concept of strategy through the lens of the Habermasian concept of communicative rationality. It draws upon the theory of communicative action to posit "intersubjectivity" (the degree to which interlocutors assess themselves as engaged in ideal-type communication) as the means through which communicative and strategic orientations are reconciled in interaction. The research involved a quasi-experimental study in which two sets of teams playing a negotiation-intensive board game differed in terms of the orienting information they received. Players oriented toward the strategic aspect of the game initially reported lower intersubjectivity with nonteammates than did players oriented toward the communicative features of the game. By the end of the game, this difference was no longer observed. These results are consistent with the fundamental Habermasian precept of the primacy of communication over strategy, so that a communicative orientation persists even in the face of a clearly strategic context of interaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-139
Number of pages10
JournalAtlantic Journal of Communication
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

intersubjectivity
rationality
communicative action
ideal type
communication
Communication
interaction
Lenses

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{2c913e8f8f14470cb10cfbd5cbeec937,
title = "Communicative Rationality, Strategy, and Intersubjectivity: Results From a Quasi-Experimental Investigation",
abstract = "This article presents some results from an investigation of the concept of strategy through the lens of the Habermasian concept of communicative rationality. It draws upon the theory of communicative action to posit {"}intersubjectivity{"} (the degree to which interlocutors assess themselves as engaged in ideal-type communication) as the means through which communicative and strategic orientations are reconciled in interaction. The research involved a quasi-experimental study in which two sets of teams playing a negotiation-intensive board game differed in terms of the orienting information they received. Players oriented toward the strategic aspect of the game initially reported lower intersubjectivity with nonteammates than did players oriented toward the communicative features of the game. By the end of the game, this difference was no longer observed. These results are consistent with the fundamental Habermasian precept of the primacy of communication over strategy, so that a communicative orientation persists even in the face of a clearly strategic context of interaction.",
author = "White, {William Joseph}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15456870.2012.665348",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "130--139",
journal = "Atlantic Journal of Communication",
issn = "1545-6870",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicative Rationality, Strategy, and Intersubjectivity

T2 - Results From a Quasi-Experimental Investigation

AU - White, William Joseph

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - This article presents some results from an investigation of the concept of strategy through the lens of the Habermasian concept of communicative rationality. It draws upon the theory of communicative action to posit "intersubjectivity" (the degree to which interlocutors assess themselves as engaged in ideal-type communication) as the means through which communicative and strategic orientations are reconciled in interaction. The research involved a quasi-experimental study in which two sets of teams playing a negotiation-intensive board game differed in terms of the orienting information they received. Players oriented toward the strategic aspect of the game initially reported lower intersubjectivity with nonteammates than did players oriented toward the communicative features of the game. By the end of the game, this difference was no longer observed. These results are consistent with the fundamental Habermasian precept of the primacy of communication over strategy, so that a communicative orientation persists even in the face of a clearly strategic context of interaction.

AB - This article presents some results from an investigation of the concept of strategy through the lens of the Habermasian concept of communicative rationality. It draws upon the theory of communicative action to posit "intersubjectivity" (the degree to which interlocutors assess themselves as engaged in ideal-type communication) as the means through which communicative and strategic orientations are reconciled in interaction. The research involved a quasi-experimental study in which two sets of teams playing a negotiation-intensive board game differed in terms of the orienting information they received. Players oriented toward the strategic aspect of the game initially reported lower intersubjectivity with nonteammates than did players oriented toward the communicative features of the game. By the end of the game, this difference was no longer observed. These results are consistent with the fundamental Habermasian precept of the primacy of communication over strategy, so that a communicative orientation persists even in the face of a clearly strategic context of interaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860325883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860325883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15456870.2012.665348

DO - 10.1080/15456870.2012.665348

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 130

EP - 139

JO - Atlantic Journal of Communication

JF - Atlantic Journal of Communication

SN - 1545-6870

IS - 2

ER -