Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs

Arnab Majumder, Joshua S. Winder, Yuxiang Wen, Eric Pauli, Igor Belyansky, Yuri W. Novitsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Contaminated operative fields pose significant challenges for surgeons performing ventral hernia repair. Although biologic meshes have been utilized increasingly in these fields, recent evidence suggests that synthetic meshes represent a viable option. We analyzed the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh utilized in patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields using biologic or synthetic mesh. Patient and hernia details were characterized. Primary outcomes included 90-day surgical site event, surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence. Results A total of 126 patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields (69 biologic and 57 synthetic meshes) were analyzed. Groups were similar in both patient and hernia characteristics. There were 13 (22.8%) surgical site events in the synthetic cohort compared to 29 (42.0%) in the biologic cohort, P = .024. Similarly, surgical site infections were less frequent in the synthetic group, with 7 (12.3%) vs 22 (31.9%), P = .01. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, there were more recurrences in the biologic group: 15 (26.3%) vs 4 (8.9%) in the synthetic group, P = .039. Conclusion The choice of mesh for clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repair remains debatable. We demonstrated that using synthetic sublay mesh resulted in a significantly lower wound morbidity and more durable outcomes versus a similar cohort of biologic repairs. This is likely secondary to improved bacterial clearance and faster integration of macroporous synthetics. Overall, our findings not only support suitability of synthetic mesh in contaminated settings but also challenge the purported advantage of biologics in clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)828-838
Number of pages11
JournalSurgery (United States)
Volume160
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Ventral Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Hernia
Surgical Wound Infection
Recurrence
Biological Products
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Majumder, Arnab ; Winder, Joshua S. ; Wen, Yuxiang ; Pauli, Eric ; Belyansky, Igor ; Novitsky, Yuri W. / Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. In: Surgery (United States). 2016 ; Vol. 160, No. 4. pp. 828-838.
@article{c1bd525fd8db497f9df639da6b82c645,
title = "Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs",
abstract = "Background Contaminated operative fields pose significant challenges for surgeons performing ventral hernia repair. Although biologic meshes have been utilized increasingly in these fields, recent evidence suggests that synthetic meshes represent a viable option. We analyzed the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh utilized in patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields using biologic or synthetic mesh. Patient and hernia details were characterized. Primary outcomes included 90-day surgical site event, surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence. Results A total of 126 patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields (69 biologic and 57 synthetic meshes) were analyzed. Groups were similar in both patient and hernia characteristics. There were 13 (22.8{\%}) surgical site events in the synthetic cohort compared to 29 (42.0{\%}) in the biologic cohort, P = .024. Similarly, surgical site infections were less frequent in the synthetic group, with 7 (12.3{\%}) vs 22 (31.9{\%}), P = .01. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, there were more recurrences in the biologic group: 15 (26.3{\%}) vs 4 (8.9{\%}) in the synthetic group, P = .039. Conclusion The choice of mesh for clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repair remains debatable. We demonstrated that using synthetic sublay mesh resulted in a significantly lower wound morbidity and more durable outcomes versus a similar cohort of biologic repairs. This is likely secondary to improved bacterial clearance and faster integration of macroporous synthetics. Overall, our findings not only support suitability of synthetic mesh in contaminated settings but also challenge the purported advantage of biologics in clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repairs.",
author = "Arnab Majumder and Winder, {Joshua S.} and Yuxiang Wen and Eric Pauli and Igor Belyansky and Novitsky, {Yuri W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "828--838",
journal = "Surgery",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. / Majumder, Arnab; Winder, Joshua S.; Wen, Yuxiang; Pauli, Eric; Belyansky, Igor; Novitsky, Yuri W.

In: Surgery (United States), Vol. 160, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 828-838.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs

AU - Majumder, Arnab

AU - Winder, Joshua S.

AU - Wen, Yuxiang

AU - Pauli, Eric

AU - Belyansky, Igor

AU - Novitsky, Yuri W.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Background Contaminated operative fields pose significant challenges for surgeons performing ventral hernia repair. Although biologic meshes have been utilized increasingly in these fields, recent evidence suggests that synthetic meshes represent a viable option. We analyzed the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh utilized in patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields using biologic or synthetic mesh. Patient and hernia details were characterized. Primary outcomes included 90-day surgical site event, surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence. Results A total of 126 patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields (69 biologic and 57 synthetic meshes) were analyzed. Groups were similar in both patient and hernia characteristics. There were 13 (22.8%) surgical site events in the synthetic cohort compared to 29 (42.0%) in the biologic cohort, P = .024. Similarly, surgical site infections were less frequent in the synthetic group, with 7 (12.3%) vs 22 (31.9%), P = .01. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, there were more recurrences in the biologic group: 15 (26.3%) vs 4 (8.9%) in the synthetic group, P = .039. Conclusion The choice of mesh for clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repair remains debatable. We demonstrated that using synthetic sublay mesh resulted in a significantly lower wound morbidity and more durable outcomes versus a similar cohort of biologic repairs. This is likely secondary to improved bacterial clearance and faster integration of macroporous synthetics. Overall, our findings not only support suitability of synthetic mesh in contaminated settings but also challenge the purported advantage of biologics in clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

AB - Background Contaminated operative fields pose significant challenges for surgeons performing ventral hernia repair. Although biologic meshes have been utilized increasingly in these fields, recent evidence suggests that synthetic meshes represent a viable option. We analyzed the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh utilized in patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields using biologic or synthetic mesh. Patient and hernia details were characterized. Primary outcomes included 90-day surgical site event, surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence. Results A total of 126 patients undergoing major ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated/contaminated fields (69 biologic and 57 synthetic meshes) were analyzed. Groups were similar in both patient and hernia characteristics. There were 13 (22.8%) surgical site events in the synthetic cohort compared to 29 (42.0%) in the biologic cohort, P = .024. Similarly, surgical site infections were less frequent in the synthetic group, with 7 (12.3%) vs 22 (31.9%), P = .01. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, there were more recurrences in the biologic group: 15 (26.3%) vs 4 (8.9%) in the synthetic group, P = .039. Conclusion The choice of mesh for clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repair remains debatable. We demonstrated that using synthetic sublay mesh resulted in a significantly lower wound morbidity and more durable outcomes versus a similar cohort of biologic repairs. This is likely secondary to improved bacterial clearance and faster integration of macroporous synthetics. Overall, our findings not only support suitability of synthetic mesh in contaminated settings but also challenge the purported advantage of biologics in clean-contaminated/contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994756455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994756455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041

DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 828

EP - 838

JO - Surgery

JF - Surgery

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 4

ER -