Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques

Jian Zheng, Chunshan Song, Wei Pan, Lu Sun, Shankar Nataraj, Frederick Wilhelm, John N. Armor

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four different methods (TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR, and TPO-TGA) were used comparatively for more accurate and reliable measurements of carbon formation on used Ni/Al2O3 reforming catalysts with and without Ca-promotion. TPO-TGA could not discriminate carbon burn off and Ni oxidation, especially when only a trace amount of carbon was formed that needs to be detected. TEOM was run on-line during methane reforming, it could avoid any other effects besides the reforming reactions. There was a fairly good correlation between the two techniques. The un-promoted C11-9-09 showed a better consistence between the two methods, noting that the slope of the linear trend line is very close to 1, while G-91 showed larger amount of carbon detected by TEOM than by TPO-IR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-803
Number of pages3
JournalACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints
Volume48
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

Fingerprint

Temperature programmed desorption
Reforming reactions
Catalysts
Carbon
Methane
Oxidation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Zheng, Jian ; Song, Chunshan ; Pan, Wei ; Sun, Lu ; Nataraj, Shankar ; Wilhelm, Frederick ; Armor, John N. / Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques. In: ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints. 2003 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 801-803.
@article{50aa714213e14388bf8f4367b9093a35,
title = "Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques",
abstract = "Four different methods (TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR, and TPO-TGA) were used comparatively for more accurate and reliable measurements of carbon formation on used Ni/Al2O3 reforming catalysts with and without Ca-promotion. TPO-TGA could not discriminate carbon burn off and Ni oxidation, especially when only a trace amount of carbon was formed that needs to be detected. TEOM was run on-line during methane reforming, it could avoid any other effects besides the reforming reactions. There was a fairly good correlation between the two techniques. The un-promoted C11-9-09 showed a better consistence between the two methods, noting that the slope of the linear trend line is very close to 1, while G-91 showed larger amount of carbon detected by TEOM than by TPO-IR.",
author = "Jian Zheng and Chunshan Song and Wei Pan and Lu Sun and Shankar Nataraj and Frederick Wilhelm and Armor, {John N.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "801--803",
journal = "Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem Prepr",
issn = "0569-3772",
number = "2",

}

Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques. / Zheng, Jian; Song, Chunshan; Pan, Wei; Sun, Lu; Nataraj, Shankar; Wilhelm, Frederick; Armor, John N.

In: ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.09.2003, p. 801-803.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of carbon formation on supported in catalysts during CH4 reforming using TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR and TGA techniques

AU - Zheng, Jian

AU - Song, Chunshan

AU - Pan, Wei

AU - Sun, Lu

AU - Nataraj, Shankar

AU - Wilhelm, Frederick

AU - Armor, John N.

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Four different methods (TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR, and TPO-TGA) were used comparatively for more accurate and reliable measurements of carbon formation on used Ni/Al2O3 reforming catalysts with and without Ca-promotion. TPO-TGA could not discriminate carbon burn off and Ni oxidation, especially when only a trace amount of carbon was formed that needs to be detected. TEOM was run on-line during methane reforming, it could avoid any other effects besides the reforming reactions. There was a fairly good correlation between the two techniques. The un-promoted C11-9-09 showed a better consistence between the two methods, noting that the slope of the linear trend line is very close to 1, while G-91 showed larger amount of carbon detected by TEOM than by TPO-IR.

AB - Four different methods (TEOM, TPO-IR, TPD-IR, and TPO-TGA) were used comparatively for more accurate and reliable measurements of carbon formation on used Ni/Al2O3 reforming catalysts with and without Ca-promotion. TPO-TGA could not discriminate carbon burn off and Ni oxidation, especially when only a trace amount of carbon was formed that needs to be detected. TEOM was run on-line during methane reforming, it could avoid any other effects besides the reforming reactions. There was a fairly good correlation between the two techniques. The un-promoted C11-9-09 showed a better consistence between the two methods, noting that the slope of the linear trend line is very close to 1, while G-91 showed larger amount of carbon detected by TEOM than by TPO-IR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1042278373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1042278373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:1042278373

VL - 48

SP - 801

EP - 803

JO - Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem Prepr

JF - Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem Prepr

SN - 0569-3772

IS - 2

ER -