Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators

Charles S. Sosa, Marek Flaska, Sara A. Pozzi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This work compares the PSD performance of two systems: one digital (NI PXI-5124) and one analog (Mesytec MPD4). Both systems were optimized for the best possible PSD performance, when using the same data acquisition system: PXI-5124, having 12 bit resolution, 10 V pulse-height dynamic range, and a 200 MHz sampling rate. Measurement conditions were kept identical between systems. A 5×5″ Organic-Liquid Scintillator (EJ-309), coupled to a PMT (ETL-9821), = was used to measure Cf-252. FOM values helped to quantify PSD performance for both systems. The results indicate that the analog PSD system marginally outperformed the digital PSD system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)9781479960972
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 2016
EventIEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014 - Seattle, United States
Duration: Nov 8 2014Nov 15 2014

Publication series

Name2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014

Other

OtherIEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle
Period11/8/1411/15/14

Fingerprint

organic liquids
Information Systems
scintillation counters
discrimination
analogs
pulses
digital systems
pulse amplitude
data acquisition
dynamic range
sampling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Sosa, C. S., Flaska, M., & Pozzi, S. A. (2016). Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators. In 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014 [7431097] (2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097
Sosa, Charles S. ; Flaska, Marek ; Pozzi, Sara A. / Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators. 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. (2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014).
@inproceedings{a124324806db428b8ac98b3cb953534a,
title = "Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators",
abstract = "This work compares the PSD performance of two systems: one digital (NI PXI-5124) and one analog (Mesytec MPD4). Both systems were optimized for the best possible PSD performance, when using the same data acquisition system: PXI-5124, having 12 bit resolution, 10 V pulse-height dynamic range, and a 200 MHz sampling rate. Measurement conditions were kept identical between systems. A 5×5″ Organic-Liquid Scintillator (EJ-309), coupled to a PMT (ETL-9821), = was used to measure Cf-252. FOM values helped to quantify PSD performance for both systems. The results indicate that the analog PSD system marginally outperformed the digital PSD system.",
author = "Sosa, {Charles S.} and Marek Flaska and Pozzi, {Sara A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097",
language = "English (US)",
series = "2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
booktitle = "2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014",
address = "United States",

}

Sosa, CS, Flaska, M & Pozzi, SA 2016, Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators. in 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014., 7431097, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014, Seattle, United States, 11/8/14. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097

Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators. / Sosa, Charles S.; Flaska, Marek; Pozzi, Sara A.

2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. 7431097 (2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators

AU - Sosa, Charles S.

AU - Flaska, Marek

AU - Pozzi, Sara A.

PY - 2016/3/10

Y1 - 2016/3/10

N2 - This work compares the PSD performance of two systems: one digital (NI PXI-5124) and one analog (Mesytec MPD4). Both systems were optimized for the best possible PSD performance, when using the same data acquisition system: PXI-5124, having 12 bit resolution, 10 V pulse-height dynamic range, and a 200 MHz sampling rate. Measurement conditions were kept identical between systems. A 5×5″ Organic-Liquid Scintillator (EJ-309), coupled to a PMT (ETL-9821), = was used to measure Cf-252. FOM values helped to quantify PSD performance for both systems. The results indicate that the analog PSD system marginally outperformed the digital PSD system.

AB - This work compares the PSD performance of two systems: one digital (NI PXI-5124) and one analog (Mesytec MPD4). Both systems were optimized for the best possible PSD performance, when using the same data acquisition system: PXI-5124, having 12 bit resolution, 10 V pulse-height dynamic range, and a 200 MHz sampling rate. Measurement conditions were kept identical between systems. A 5×5″ Organic-Liquid Scintillator (EJ-309), coupled to a PMT (ETL-9821), = was used to measure Cf-252. FOM values helped to quantify PSD performance for both systems. The results indicate that the analog PSD system marginally outperformed the digital PSD system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965027968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965027968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097

DO - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84965027968

T3 - 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014

BT - 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -

Sosa CS, Flaska M, Pozzi SA. Comparing analog and digital pulse-shape-discrimination system performance for Organic-Liquid Scintillators. In 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2016. 7431097. (2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431097