Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA

Roger T. Koide, Binh Thanh Nguyen, R. Howard Skinner, Curtis J. Dell, Paul R. Adler, Patrick Joseph Drohan, Megan Licht, Monica Boyer Matthews, Rachel Nettles, Kevin Ricks, John Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To avoid competition with food crops, biofuel feedstocks may need to be produced on economically marginal lands where yields are limited and replacement of existing vegetation will reduce soil C, foregoing some CO2 emission savings. Therefore, our first goal was to determine whether biochar application to marginal lands could improve switchgrass yield while sequestering sufficient soil C to eliminate the negative impact of cultivation. Because it may be difficult to obtain large quantities of biochar, our second goal was to compare small, incremental and large, all-at-once biochar applications. Our third goal was to determine whether biochar had any negative effects on earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, soil bacteria, soil fungi, and soil enzyme activity. We grew switchgrass at two sites with poorly drained soils and two sites with excessively drained soils. Irrespective of site, biochar significantly increased yield when we rototilled in the entire amount before planting but not when we applied it incrementally between crop rows using a chisel plow. Biochar increased soil C stocks, in some cases increasing it beyond that found in soils of intact marginal land vegetation. Nevertheless, mixing biochar with soil had little or no impact on earthworm activity, mycorrhizal colonization, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil enzyme activities. We conclude that biochar may be part of an effective strategy for producing switchgrass on marginal lands, but the choice of application method depends on the relative importance of several considerations including biochar availability, switchgrass yield, C sequestration, soil erosion, and ease of application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)784-802
Number of pages19
JournalBioenergy Research
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

biochar
Panicum virgatum
application methods
Soils
soil
soil enzymes
soil fungi
soil bacteria
earthworms
Enzyme activity
enzyme activity
Fungi
poorly drained soils
Crops
vegetation
food crops
plows
feedstocks
biofuels
soil erosion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Energy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Koide, Roger T. ; Nguyen, Binh Thanh ; Howard Skinner, R. ; Dell, Curtis J. ; Adler, Paul R. ; Drohan, Patrick Joseph ; Licht, Megan ; Matthews, Monica Boyer ; Nettles, Rachel ; Ricks, Kevin ; Watkins, John. / Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA. In: Bioenergy Research. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 784-802.
@article{7eca8d14b31549c98a93396b4474ebb1,
title = "Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA",
abstract = "To avoid competition with food crops, biofuel feedstocks may need to be produced on economically marginal lands where yields are limited and replacement of existing vegetation will reduce soil C, foregoing some CO2 emission savings. Therefore, our first goal was to determine whether biochar application to marginal lands could improve switchgrass yield while sequestering sufficient soil C to eliminate the negative impact of cultivation. Because it may be difficult to obtain large quantities of biochar, our second goal was to compare small, incremental and large, all-at-once biochar applications. Our third goal was to determine whether biochar had any negative effects on earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, soil bacteria, soil fungi, and soil enzyme activity. We grew switchgrass at two sites with poorly drained soils and two sites with excessively drained soils. Irrespective of site, biochar significantly increased yield when we rototilled in the entire amount before planting but not when we applied it incrementally between crop rows using a chisel plow. Biochar increased soil C stocks, in some cases increasing it beyond that found in soils of intact marginal land vegetation. Nevertheless, mixing biochar with soil had little or no impact on earthworm activity, mycorrhizal colonization, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil enzyme activities. We conclude that biochar may be part of an effective strategy for producing switchgrass on marginal lands, but the choice of application method depends on the relative importance of several considerations including biochar availability, switchgrass yield, C sequestration, soil erosion, and ease of application.",
author = "Koide, {Roger T.} and Nguyen, {Binh Thanh} and {Howard Skinner}, R. and Dell, {Curtis J.} and Adler, {Paul R.} and Drohan, {Patrick Joseph} and Megan Licht and Matthews, {Monica Boyer} and Rachel Nettles and Kevin Ricks and John Watkins",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12155-018-9940-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "784--802",
journal = "Bioenergy Research",
issn = "1939-1234",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Koide, RT, Nguyen, BT, Howard Skinner, R, Dell, CJ, Adler, PR, Drohan, PJ, Licht, M, Matthews, MB, Nettles, R, Ricks, K & Watkins, J 2018, 'Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA', Bioenergy Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 784-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-018-9940-1

Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA. / Koide, Roger T.; Nguyen, Binh Thanh; Howard Skinner, R.; Dell, Curtis J.; Adler, Paul R.; Drohan, Patrick Joseph; Licht, Megan; Matthews, Monica Boyer; Nettles, Rachel; Ricks, Kevin; Watkins, John.

In: Bioenergy Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 784-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Biochar Application Methods for Switchgrass Yield and C Sequestration on Contrasting Marginal Lands in Pennsylvania, USA

AU - Koide, Roger T.

AU - Nguyen, Binh Thanh

AU - Howard Skinner, R.

AU - Dell, Curtis J.

AU - Adler, Paul R.

AU - Drohan, Patrick Joseph

AU - Licht, Megan

AU - Matthews, Monica Boyer

AU - Nettles, Rachel

AU - Ricks, Kevin

AU - Watkins, John

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - To avoid competition with food crops, biofuel feedstocks may need to be produced on economically marginal lands where yields are limited and replacement of existing vegetation will reduce soil C, foregoing some CO2 emission savings. Therefore, our first goal was to determine whether biochar application to marginal lands could improve switchgrass yield while sequestering sufficient soil C to eliminate the negative impact of cultivation. Because it may be difficult to obtain large quantities of biochar, our second goal was to compare small, incremental and large, all-at-once biochar applications. Our third goal was to determine whether biochar had any negative effects on earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, soil bacteria, soil fungi, and soil enzyme activity. We grew switchgrass at two sites with poorly drained soils and two sites with excessively drained soils. Irrespective of site, biochar significantly increased yield when we rototilled in the entire amount before planting but not when we applied it incrementally between crop rows using a chisel plow. Biochar increased soil C stocks, in some cases increasing it beyond that found in soils of intact marginal land vegetation. Nevertheless, mixing biochar with soil had little or no impact on earthworm activity, mycorrhizal colonization, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil enzyme activities. We conclude that biochar may be part of an effective strategy for producing switchgrass on marginal lands, but the choice of application method depends on the relative importance of several considerations including biochar availability, switchgrass yield, C sequestration, soil erosion, and ease of application.

AB - To avoid competition with food crops, biofuel feedstocks may need to be produced on economically marginal lands where yields are limited and replacement of existing vegetation will reduce soil C, foregoing some CO2 emission savings. Therefore, our first goal was to determine whether biochar application to marginal lands could improve switchgrass yield while sequestering sufficient soil C to eliminate the negative impact of cultivation. Because it may be difficult to obtain large quantities of biochar, our second goal was to compare small, incremental and large, all-at-once biochar applications. Our third goal was to determine whether biochar had any negative effects on earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, soil bacteria, soil fungi, and soil enzyme activity. We grew switchgrass at two sites with poorly drained soils and two sites with excessively drained soils. Irrespective of site, biochar significantly increased yield when we rototilled in the entire amount before planting but not when we applied it incrementally between crop rows using a chisel plow. Biochar increased soil C stocks, in some cases increasing it beyond that found in soils of intact marginal land vegetation. Nevertheless, mixing biochar with soil had little or no impact on earthworm activity, mycorrhizal colonization, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil enzyme activities. We conclude that biochar may be part of an effective strategy for producing switchgrass on marginal lands, but the choice of application method depends on the relative importance of several considerations including biochar availability, switchgrass yield, C sequestration, soil erosion, and ease of application.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053934878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053934878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12155-018-9940-1

DO - 10.1007/s12155-018-9940-1

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 784

EP - 802

JO - Bioenergy Research

JF - Bioenergy Research

SN - 1939-1234

IS - 4

ER -