Comparing Client Outcomes for Two Evidence-Based Treatment Consultation Strategies

Beverly Funderburk, Mark Chaffin, Elizabeth Bard, Jenelle Shanley, David Bard, Lucy Berliner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Posttraining expert case consultation is a key component of transporting and scaling up evidence-based treatments, and hopefully retaining their efficacy. Live practice observation and in vivo coaching is a strategy used in academic training environments, but is rarely feasible in field settings. Post hoc telephone consultation is a substitute strategy but does not approximate many aspects of live coaching. Live video technology offers a closer approximation but has not yet been sufficiently tested. Using a roll-out experimental design, this study compared client outcomes across doses of two posttraining expert consultation strategies—standard telephone consultation and live video coaching. The study was conducted during a two-state, 30-agency implementation involving 80 therapists and 330 cases receiving Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Child behavior problems fell from well above to below clinical cutoff values, with about a 1 standard deviation improvement in 14 sessions, which is within the range reported in laboratory efficacy trials. Symptom improvement was augmented by increased therapist dose of live video consultations. Phone consultation dose had no association with client level outcomes. PCIT benefits appear to be retained when the model is transported at scale into the field, and live video consultation appeared to offer small but significant advantages over telephone consultation as one element of an overall transport strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)730-741
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2015

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Telephone
Child Behavior
Teaching
Research Design
Observation
Technology
Therapeutics
Mentoring

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Funderburk, Beverly ; Chaffin, Mark ; Bard, Elizabeth ; Shanley, Jenelle ; Bard, David ; Berliner, Lucy. / Comparing Client Outcomes for Two Evidence-Based Treatment Consultation Strategies. In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 5. pp. 730-741.
@article{7826a80066964e3c9c39d05ca7f196cf,
title = "Comparing Client Outcomes for Two Evidence-Based Treatment Consultation Strategies",
abstract = "Posttraining expert case consultation is a key component of transporting and scaling up evidence-based treatments, and hopefully retaining their efficacy. Live practice observation and in vivo coaching is a strategy used in academic training environments, but is rarely feasible in field settings. Post hoc telephone consultation is a substitute strategy but does not approximate many aspects of live coaching. Live video technology offers a closer approximation but has not yet been sufficiently tested. Using a roll-out experimental design, this study compared client outcomes across doses of two posttraining expert consultation strategies—standard telephone consultation and live video coaching. The study was conducted during a two-state, 30-agency implementation involving 80 therapists and 330 cases receiving Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Child behavior problems fell from well above to below clinical cutoff values, with about a 1 standard deviation improvement in 14 sessions, which is within the range reported in laboratory efficacy trials. Symptom improvement was augmented by increased therapist dose of live video consultations. Phone consultation dose had no association with client level outcomes. PCIT benefits appear to be retained when the model is transported at scale into the field, and live video consultation appeared to offer small but significant advantages over telephone consultation as one element of an overall transport strategy.",
author = "Beverly Funderburk and Mark Chaffin and Elizabeth Bard and Jenelle Shanley and David Bard and Lucy Berliner",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15374416.2014.910790",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "730--741",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Comparing Client Outcomes for Two Evidence-Based Treatment Consultation Strategies. / Funderburk, Beverly; Chaffin, Mark; Bard, Elizabeth; Shanley, Jenelle; Bard, David; Berliner, Lucy.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 5, 03.09.2015, p. 730-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Client Outcomes for Two Evidence-Based Treatment Consultation Strategies

AU - Funderburk, Beverly

AU - Chaffin, Mark

AU - Bard, Elizabeth

AU - Shanley, Jenelle

AU - Bard, David

AU - Berliner, Lucy

PY - 2015/9/3

Y1 - 2015/9/3

N2 - Posttraining expert case consultation is a key component of transporting and scaling up evidence-based treatments, and hopefully retaining their efficacy. Live practice observation and in vivo coaching is a strategy used in academic training environments, but is rarely feasible in field settings. Post hoc telephone consultation is a substitute strategy but does not approximate many aspects of live coaching. Live video technology offers a closer approximation but has not yet been sufficiently tested. Using a roll-out experimental design, this study compared client outcomes across doses of two posttraining expert consultation strategies—standard telephone consultation and live video coaching. The study was conducted during a two-state, 30-agency implementation involving 80 therapists and 330 cases receiving Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Child behavior problems fell from well above to below clinical cutoff values, with about a 1 standard deviation improvement in 14 sessions, which is within the range reported in laboratory efficacy trials. Symptom improvement was augmented by increased therapist dose of live video consultations. Phone consultation dose had no association with client level outcomes. PCIT benefits appear to be retained when the model is transported at scale into the field, and live video consultation appeared to offer small but significant advantages over telephone consultation as one element of an overall transport strategy.

AB - Posttraining expert case consultation is a key component of transporting and scaling up evidence-based treatments, and hopefully retaining their efficacy. Live practice observation and in vivo coaching is a strategy used in academic training environments, but is rarely feasible in field settings. Post hoc telephone consultation is a substitute strategy but does not approximate many aspects of live coaching. Live video technology offers a closer approximation but has not yet been sufficiently tested. Using a roll-out experimental design, this study compared client outcomes across doses of two posttraining expert consultation strategies—standard telephone consultation and live video coaching. The study was conducted during a two-state, 30-agency implementation involving 80 therapists and 330 cases receiving Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Child behavior problems fell from well above to below clinical cutoff values, with about a 1 standard deviation improvement in 14 sessions, which is within the range reported in laboratory efficacy trials. Symptom improvement was augmented by increased therapist dose of live video consultations. Phone consultation dose had no association with client level outcomes. PCIT benefits appear to be retained when the model is transported at scale into the field, and live video consultation appeared to offer small but significant advantages over telephone consultation as one element of an overall transport strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938417164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938417164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2014.910790

DO - 10.1080/15374416.2014.910790

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 730

EP - 741

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - 5

ER -