Comparing Cost-Mitigation Techniques

Robert Novy-Marx, Mihail Velikov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article compares the efficacy of three common transaction-cost-mitigation techniques: limiting a strategy to cheap-to-trade securities, rebalancing a strategy less frequently, and “banding,” which imposes a higher hurdle for actively trading into a position than for maintaining an established position. All three strategies significantly reduce transaction costs, but the techniques that reduce turnover have a less negative impact on strategy gross performance than limiting trade to low-cost securities has. Banding is more effective than simply reducing rebalancing frequencies, because banding yields similar trading-cost reductions while maintaining a better exposure to the underlying signal used to select stocks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-102
Number of pages18
JournalFinancial Analysts Journal
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Costs
Mitigation
Rebalancing
Transaction costs
Efficacy
Trading costs
Turnover

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Novy-Marx, Robert ; Velikov, Mihail. / Comparing Cost-Mitigation Techniques. In: Financial Analysts Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 75, No. 1. pp. 85-102.
@article{ae77f7d6d1414ab794a61b682a2f77a1,
title = "Comparing Cost-Mitigation Techniques",
abstract = "This article compares the efficacy of three common transaction-cost-mitigation techniques: limiting a strategy to cheap-to-trade securities, rebalancing a strategy less frequently, and “banding,” which imposes a higher hurdle for actively trading into a position than for maintaining an established position. All three strategies significantly reduce transaction costs, but the techniques that reduce turnover have a less negative impact on strategy gross performance than limiting trade to low-cost securities has. Banding is more effective than simply reducing rebalancing frequencies, because banding yields similar trading-cost reductions while maintaining a better exposure to the underlying signal used to select stocks.",
author = "Robert Novy-Marx and Mihail Velikov",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0015198X.2018.1547057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "85--102",
journal = "Financial Analysts Journal",
issn = "0015-198X",
publisher = "CFA Institute",
number = "1",

}

Comparing Cost-Mitigation Techniques. / Novy-Marx, Robert; Velikov, Mihail.

In: Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 75, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 85-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Cost-Mitigation Techniques

AU - Novy-Marx, Robert

AU - Velikov, Mihail

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This article compares the efficacy of three common transaction-cost-mitigation techniques: limiting a strategy to cheap-to-trade securities, rebalancing a strategy less frequently, and “banding,” which imposes a higher hurdle for actively trading into a position than for maintaining an established position. All three strategies significantly reduce transaction costs, but the techniques that reduce turnover have a less negative impact on strategy gross performance than limiting trade to low-cost securities has. Banding is more effective than simply reducing rebalancing frequencies, because banding yields similar trading-cost reductions while maintaining a better exposure to the underlying signal used to select stocks.

AB - This article compares the efficacy of three common transaction-cost-mitigation techniques: limiting a strategy to cheap-to-trade securities, rebalancing a strategy less frequently, and “banding,” which imposes a higher hurdle for actively trading into a position than for maintaining an established position. All three strategies significantly reduce transaction costs, but the techniques that reduce turnover have a less negative impact on strategy gross performance than limiting trade to low-cost securities has. Banding is more effective than simply reducing rebalancing frequencies, because banding yields similar trading-cost reductions while maintaining a better exposure to the underlying signal used to select stocks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061063091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061063091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0015198X.2018.1547057

DO - 10.1080/0015198X.2018.1547057

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061063091

VL - 75

SP - 85

EP - 102

JO - Financial Analysts Journal

JF - Financial Analysts Journal

SN - 0015-198X

IS - 1

ER -