Comparing different moving target defense techniques

Jun Xu, Pinyao Guo, Mingyi Zhao, Robert F. Erbacher, Minghui Zhu, Peng Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-107
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Volume2014-November
Issue numberNovember
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 7 2014
Event1st ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense, MTD 2014 - Co-located with 21st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2014 - Scottsdale, United States
Duration: Nov 3 2014 → …

Fingerprint

Uncertainty

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Xu, Jun ; Guo, Pinyao ; Zhao, Mingyi ; Erbacher, Robert F. ; Zhu, Minghui ; Liu, Peng. / Comparing different moving target defense techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2014 ; Vol. 2014-November, No. November. pp. 97-107.
@article{ec4f45375f304e4eb6410ad6b2ee8656,
title = "Comparing different moving target defense techniques",
abstract = "Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.",
author = "Jun Xu and Pinyao Guo and Mingyi Zhao and Erbacher, {Robert F.} and Minghui Zhu and Peng Liu",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1145/2663474.2663486",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2014-November",
pages = "97--107",
journal = "Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security",
issn = "1543-7221",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "November",

}

Comparing different moving target defense techniques. / Xu, Jun; Guo, Pinyao; Zhao, Mingyi; Erbacher, Robert F.; Zhu, Minghui; Liu, Peng.

In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vol. 2014-November, No. November, 07.11.2014, p. 97-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing different moving target defense techniques

AU - Xu, Jun

AU - Guo, Pinyao

AU - Zhao, Mingyi

AU - Erbacher, Robert F.

AU - Zhu, Minghui

AU - Liu, Peng

PY - 2014/11/7

Y1 - 2014/11/7

N2 - Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

AB - Moving Target Defense techniques have been proposed to increase uncertainty and apparent complexity for attackers. When more than one Moving Target Defense techniques are effective to limit opportunities of an attack, it is required to compare these techniques and select the best defense choice. In this paper, we propose a three-layer model to evaluate and compare effectiveness of different Moving Target De- fenses. This model is designed as an attempt to fill a gap among existing evaluation methods and works as a systematic framework for Moving Target Defense comparison.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937675431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937675431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2663474.2663486

DO - 10.1145/2663474.2663486

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84937675431

VL - 2014-November

SP - 97

EP - 107

JO - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security

JF - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security

SN - 1543-7221

IS - November

ER -