Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy between ordinary kriging and regression kriging was compared based on the combined consideration of sample size, spatial structure, and auxiliary variables (terrain indices and electromagnetic induction surveys) for a variety of soil properties in two contrasting landscapes (agricultural vs. forested). When spatial structure could not be well captured by point-based observations (e.g., when the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range was > 0.5), or when a strong relationship existed between target soil properties and auxiliary variables (e.g., their R2 was > 0.6), regression kriging (RK) was more accurate for interpolating soil properties in both landscapes studied. Otherwise, ordinary kriging (OK) was better. Soil depth and wetness condition did not appear to affect the selection of kriging for soil moisture interpolation, because they did not significantly change the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range and the relationship with the auxiliary variables. Because of a smaller ratio of elevation change over total study area (E/A = 1.2) and multiple parent materials in the agricultural land, OK was generally more accurate in that landscape. In contrast, a larger E/A ratio of 6.8 and a single parent material led to RK being preferable in the steep-sloped forested catchment. The results from this study can be useful for selecting kriging for various soil properties and landscapes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)594-606
Number of pages13
JournalPedosphere
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

kriging
soil properties
soil property
parent material
spacing
agricultural land
spatial distribution
single parents
single parent
electromagnetic survey
forested catchment
forested watersheds
soil depth
sampling
interpolation
soil moisture
soil water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science

Cite this

@article{1119bc4b8e4b46d3bca580c2430736cb,
title = "Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes",
abstract = "The accuracy between ordinary kriging and regression kriging was compared based on the combined consideration of sample size, spatial structure, and auxiliary variables (terrain indices and electromagnetic induction surveys) for a variety of soil properties in two contrasting landscapes (agricultural vs. forested). When spatial structure could not be well captured by point-based observations (e.g., when the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range was > 0.5), or when a strong relationship existed between target soil properties and auxiliary variables (e.g., their R2 was > 0.6), regression kriging (RK) was more accurate for interpolating soil properties in both landscapes studied. Otherwise, ordinary kriging (OK) was better. Soil depth and wetness condition did not appear to affect the selection of kriging for soil moisture interpolation, because they did not significantly change the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range and the relationship with the auxiliary variables. Because of a smaller ratio of elevation change over total study area (E/A = 1.2) and multiple parent materials in the agricultural land, OK was generally more accurate in that landscape. In contrast, a larger E/A ratio of 6.8 and a single parent material led to RK being preferable in the steep-sloped forested catchment. The results from this study can be useful for selecting kriging for various soil properties and landscapes.",
author = "Q. Zhu and Hangsheng Lin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60049-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "594--606",
journal = "Pedosphere",
issn = "1002-0160",
publisher = "Institute of Soil Science",
number = "5",

}

Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes. / Zhu, Q.; Lin, Hangsheng.

In: Pedosphere, Vol. 20, No. 5, 01.01.2010, p. 594-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes

AU - Zhu, Q.

AU - Lin, Hangsheng

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The accuracy between ordinary kriging and regression kriging was compared based on the combined consideration of sample size, spatial structure, and auxiliary variables (terrain indices and electromagnetic induction surveys) for a variety of soil properties in two contrasting landscapes (agricultural vs. forested). When spatial structure could not be well captured by point-based observations (e.g., when the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range was > 0.5), or when a strong relationship existed between target soil properties and auxiliary variables (e.g., their R2 was > 0.6), regression kriging (RK) was more accurate for interpolating soil properties in both landscapes studied. Otherwise, ordinary kriging (OK) was better. Soil depth and wetness condition did not appear to affect the selection of kriging for soil moisture interpolation, because they did not significantly change the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range and the relationship with the auxiliary variables. Because of a smaller ratio of elevation change over total study area (E/A = 1.2) and multiple parent materials in the agricultural land, OK was generally more accurate in that landscape. In contrast, a larger E/A ratio of 6.8 and a single parent material led to RK being preferable in the steep-sloped forested catchment. The results from this study can be useful for selecting kriging for various soil properties and landscapes.

AB - The accuracy between ordinary kriging and regression kriging was compared based on the combined consideration of sample size, spatial structure, and auxiliary variables (terrain indices and electromagnetic induction surveys) for a variety of soil properties in two contrasting landscapes (agricultural vs. forested). When spatial structure could not be well captured by point-based observations (e.g., when the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range was > 0.5), or when a strong relationship existed between target soil properties and auxiliary variables (e.g., their R2 was > 0.6), regression kriging (RK) was more accurate for interpolating soil properties in both landscapes studied. Otherwise, ordinary kriging (OK) was better. Soil depth and wetness condition did not appear to affect the selection of kriging for soil moisture interpolation, because they did not significantly change the ratio of sample spacing over correlation range and the relationship with the auxiliary variables. Because of a smaller ratio of elevation change over total study area (E/A = 1.2) and multiple parent materials in the agricultural land, OK was generally more accurate in that landscape. In contrast, a larger E/A ratio of 6.8 and a single parent material led to RK being preferable in the steep-sloped forested catchment. The results from this study can be useful for selecting kriging for various soil properties and landscapes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956256282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956256282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60049-5

DO - 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60049-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956256282

VL - 20

SP - 594

EP - 606

JO - Pedosphere

JF - Pedosphere

SN - 1002-0160

IS - 5

ER -