COMPARISON OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURES: MODELS WITH COMPLETE AND INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

This paper develops a series of models under different assumptions with regard to (i) the information available to the arbiter about the preferences of the parties, (ii) the information available to the parties about the preferences of the arbiter and (iii) the specific approach adopted by the arbiter to resolve the issue, in order to throw some light on the effect of the arbitration recourse on bargaining. The approach followed is Bayesian and is similar to that used in the recent bargaining models developed at Harvard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-212
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings - International Conference on Cybernetics and Society
StatePublished - Jan 1 1980
EventProc Int Conf Cybern Soc - Cambridge, MA, Engl
Duration: Oct 8 1980Oct 10 1980

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{7a95837abdd6463788dfc7587f5d4f92,
title = "COMPARISON OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURES: MODELS WITH COMPLETE AND INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.",
abstract = "This paper develops a series of models under different assumptions with regard to (i) the information available to the arbiter about the preferences of the parties, (ii) the information available to the parties about the preferences of the arbiter and (iii) the specific approach adopted by the arbiter to resolve the issue, in order to throw some light on the effect of the arbitration recourse on bargaining. The approach followed is Bayesian and is similar to that used in the recent bargaining models developed at Harvard.",
author = "Kalyan Chatterjee",
year = "1980",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "207--212",
journal = "Proceedings - International Conference on Cybernetics and Society",
issn = "0163-6006",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMPARISON OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURES

T2 - MODELS WITH COMPLETE AND INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.

AU - Chatterjee, Kalyan

PY - 1980/1/1

Y1 - 1980/1/1

N2 - This paper develops a series of models under different assumptions with regard to (i) the information available to the arbiter about the preferences of the parties, (ii) the information available to the parties about the preferences of the arbiter and (iii) the specific approach adopted by the arbiter to resolve the issue, in order to throw some light on the effect of the arbitration recourse on bargaining. The approach followed is Bayesian and is similar to that used in the recent bargaining models developed at Harvard.

AB - This paper develops a series of models under different assumptions with regard to (i) the information available to the arbiter about the preferences of the parties, (ii) the information available to the parties about the preferences of the arbiter and (iii) the specific approach adopted by the arbiter to resolve the issue, in order to throw some light on the effect of the arbitration recourse on bargaining. The approach followed is Bayesian and is similar to that used in the recent bargaining models developed at Harvard.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019264160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019264160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0019264160

SP - 207

EP - 212

JO - Proceedings - International Conference on Cybernetics and Society

JF - Proceedings - International Conference on Cybernetics and Society

SN - 0163-6006

ER -