Comparison of assays for catechol estrogen synthase activity: Product isolation vs radioenzymatic catechol-O-methyltransferase-coupled procedures

Deodutta Roy, Quang D. Bui, Judith Weisz, Joachim G. Liehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reported values for the activity of enzymes mediating catechol estrogen formation by hamster kidney and liver, measured by catechol-O-methyltransferase-coupled radioenzymatic assay, have been uniformly low and there have been marked discrepancies m values reported from different laboratories. Therefore, we examined the validity of the radioenzymatic assay used in these studies. NADPH-dependent estrogen 2- and 4-hydroxylase activity of hamster liver microsomes measured by radioenzymatic assay was comparable to that reported in the literature but at least one order of magnitude lower than that obtained with a direct product isolation assay. Several features of the radioenzymatic assay were identified which, together, contribute to the underestimation of enzyme activity. They include, incomplete protection from oxidative degradation of both the catechol estrogens generated and of the catechol-O-methyltransferase and assay conditions which are suboptimal for O-methylation of the catechol estrogens. We conclude that results obtained using the catechol-O-methyltransferase-based radioenzymatic assay can only be considered valid if a consistent stoichiometric relationship can be demonstrated between the amounts of catechol estrogens and their O-methylated products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-249
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Steroid Biochemistry
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1989

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of assays for catechol estrogen synthase activity: Product isolation vs radioenzymatic catechol-O-methyltransferase-coupled procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this