Comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise

Kenneth Steven Brentner, Anastasios S. Lyrintzis, Evangelos K. Koutsavdis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two methods for predicting transonic rotor noise for helicopters in hover and forward flight. Both methods rely on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution as input to predict the acoustic near and far fields. For this work, the same full-potential rotor code has been used to compute the CFD solution for both acoustic methods. The first method employs the acoustic analogy as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams - Hawkings equation, including the quadrupole term. The second method uses a rotating Kirchhoff formulation. Computed results from both methods are compared with one another and with experimental data for both hover and advancing rotor cases. The results are quite good for all cases tested. The Kirchhoff method was somewhat sensitive to the location of Kirchhoff surface, if the surface was positioned too close to the rotor blade. The acoustic analogy method was not as sensitive to the extent of volume included in the quadrupole calculation. The computational requirements of both methods are comparable; in both cases these requirements are much less than the requirements for the CFD solution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-538
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Computational aeroacoustics
Acoustic noise
Rotors
Acoustics
Computational fluid dynamics
Helicopters
Turbomachine blades

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Brentner, Kenneth Steven ; Lyrintzis, Anastasios S. ; Koutsavdis, Evangelos K. / Comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise. In: Journal of Aircraft. 1997 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 531-538.
@article{c8a616dadf334dc8b96a68abab63be59,
title = "Comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise",
abstract = "This paper compares two methods for predicting transonic rotor noise for helicopters in hover and forward flight. Both methods rely on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution as input to predict the acoustic near and far fields. For this work, the same full-potential rotor code has been used to compute the CFD solution for both acoustic methods. The first method employs the acoustic analogy as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams - Hawkings equation, including the quadrupole term. The second method uses a rotating Kirchhoff formulation. Computed results from both methods are compared with one another and with experimental data for both hover and advancing rotor cases. The results are quite good for all cases tested. The Kirchhoff method was somewhat sensitive to the location of Kirchhoff surface, if the surface was positioned too close to the rotor blade. The acoustic analogy method was not as sensitive to the extent of volume included in the quadrupole calculation. The computational requirements of both methods are comparable; in both cases these requirements are much less than the requirements for the CFD solution.",
author = "Brentner, {Kenneth Steven} and Lyrintzis, {Anastasios S.} and Koutsavdis, {Evangelos K.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/2.2205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "531--538",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise. / Brentner, Kenneth Steven; Lyrintzis, Anastasios S.; Koutsavdis, Evangelos K.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.01.1997, p. 531-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods for transonic rotor noise

AU - Brentner, Kenneth Steven

AU - Lyrintzis, Anastasios S.

AU - Koutsavdis, Evangelos K.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - This paper compares two methods for predicting transonic rotor noise for helicopters in hover and forward flight. Both methods rely on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution as input to predict the acoustic near and far fields. For this work, the same full-potential rotor code has been used to compute the CFD solution for both acoustic methods. The first method employs the acoustic analogy as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams - Hawkings equation, including the quadrupole term. The second method uses a rotating Kirchhoff formulation. Computed results from both methods are compared with one another and with experimental data for both hover and advancing rotor cases. The results are quite good for all cases tested. The Kirchhoff method was somewhat sensitive to the location of Kirchhoff surface, if the surface was positioned too close to the rotor blade. The acoustic analogy method was not as sensitive to the extent of volume included in the quadrupole calculation. The computational requirements of both methods are comparable; in both cases these requirements are much less than the requirements for the CFD solution.

AB - This paper compares two methods for predicting transonic rotor noise for helicopters in hover and forward flight. Both methods rely on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution as input to predict the acoustic near and far fields. For this work, the same full-potential rotor code has been used to compute the CFD solution for both acoustic methods. The first method employs the acoustic analogy as embodied in the Ffowcs Williams - Hawkings equation, including the quadrupole term. The second method uses a rotating Kirchhoff formulation. Computed results from both methods are compared with one another and with experimental data for both hover and advancing rotor cases. The results are quite good for all cases tested. The Kirchhoff method was somewhat sensitive to the location of Kirchhoff surface, if the surface was positioned too close to the rotor blade. The acoustic analogy method was not as sensitive to the extent of volume included in the quadrupole calculation. The computational requirements of both methods are comparable; in both cases these requirements are much less than the requirements for the CFD solution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031189055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031189055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/2.2205

DO - 10.2514/2.2205

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0031189055

VL - 34

SP - 531

EP - 538

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 4

ER -