Comparison of descriptive analysis, projective mapping and sorting performed on pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes

Line Holler Mielby, Helene Hopfer, Sidsel Jensen, Anette Kistrup Thybo, Hildegarde Heymann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study the ability of three sensory methods to describe differences among visual stimuli was evaluated. We compared the two fast alternative sensory methods, projective mapping (PM) and sorting, to a generic descriptive analysis (DA), using visually different pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. Thirty-two pictures of different fruit and vegetable mixes were evaluated by two different panels (11 assessors each) using the three sensory methods. The results were compared to each other to find which of the two alternative descriptive methods, PM and sorting, lead to most similar results compared to DA. Further, the effect of replicate evaluations in fast alternative methods was assessed for visual stimuli, where the 11 assessors, conducting both the PM and sorting tasks, evaluated all pictures in duplicates. Last, an alternative analysis method to multidimensional scaling (MDS) for sorting data was evaluated, to elucidate if more detailed results could be obtained with the alternative DISTATIS procedure. Compared to DA, results obtained from both sorting and PM were similar, and similar main conclusions could be drawn from all three sensory methods. However, both PM and sorting were able to separate the samples to a higher degree than DA. With regards to the two data analysis techniques for sorting data, samples were found to group more tightly when analyzed by DISTATIS compared to MDS. Even for visually different samples, product maps changed over the replicates in the PM and sorting tasks, indicating that assessors changed their evaluation criteria when performing a holistic product evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-94
Number of pages9
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014

Fingerprint

Vegetables
sorting
Fruit
vegetables
fruits
methodology
product evaluation
sampling
data analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Mielby, Line Holler ; Hopfer, Helene ; Jensen, Sidsel ; Thybo, Anette Kistrup ; Heymann, Hildegarde. / Comparison of descriptive analysis, projective mapping and sorting performed on pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2014 ; Vol. 35. pp. 86-94.
@article{806fa445c9aa40fc83156a5ad8f751a1,
title = "Comparison of descriptive analysis, projective mapping and sorting performed on pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes",
abstract = "In this study the ability of three sensory methods to describe differences among visual stimuli was evaluated. We compared the two fast alternative sensory methods, projective mapping (PM) and sorting, to a generic descriptive analysis (DA), using visually different pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. Thirty-two pictures of different fruit and vegetable mixes were evaluated by two different panels (11 assessors each) using the three sensory methods. The results were compared to each other to find which of the two alternative descriptive methods, PM and sorting, lead to most similar results compared to DA. Further, the effect of replicate evaluations in fast alternative methods was assessed for visual stimuli, where the 11 assessors, conducting both the PM and sorting tasks, evaluated all pictures in duplicates. Last, an alternative analysis method to multidimensional scaling (MDS) for sorting data was evaluated, to elucidate if more detailed results could be obtained with the alternative DISTATIS procedure. Compared to DA, results obtained from both sorting and PM were similar, and similar main conclusions could be drawn from all three sensory methods. However, both PM and sorting were able to separate the samples to a higher degree than DA. With regards to the two data analysis techniques for sorting data, samples were found to group more tightly when analyzed by DISTATIS compared to MDS. Even for visually different samples, product maps changed over the replicates in the PM and sorting tasks, indicating that assessors changed their evaluation criteria when performing a holistic product evaluation.",
author = "Mielby, {Line Holler} and Helene Hopfer and Sidsel Jensen and Thybo, {Anette Kistrup} and Hildegarde Heymann",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "86--94",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Comparison of descriptive analysis, projective mapping and sorting performed on pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. / Mielby, Line Holler; Hopfer, Helene; Jensen, Sidsel; Thybo, Anette Kistrup; Heymann, Hildegarde.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 35, 01.07.2014, p. 86-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of descriptive analysis, projective mapping and sorting performed on pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes

AU - Mielby, Line Holler

AU - Hopfer, Helene

AU - Jensen, Sidsel

AU - Thybo, Anette Kistrup

AU - Heymann, Hildegarde

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - In this study the ability of three sensory methods to describe differences among visual stimuli was evaluated. We compared the two fast alternative sensory methods, projective mapping (PM) and sorting, to a generic descriptive analysis (DA), using visually different pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. Thirty-two pictures of different fruit and vegetable mixes were evaluated by two different panels (11 assessors each) using the three sensory methods. The results were compared to each other to find which of the two alternative descriptive methods, PM and sorting, lead to most similar results compared to DA. Further, the effect of replicate evaluations in fast alternative methods was assessed for visual stimuli, where the 11 assessors, conducting both the PM and sorting tasks, evaluated all pictures in duplicates. Last, an alternative analysis method to multidimensional scaling (MDS) for sorting data was evaluated, to elucidate if more detailed results could be obtained with the alternative DISTATIS procedure. Compared to DA, results obtained from both sorting and PM were similar, and similar main conclusions could be drawn from all three sensory methods. However, both PM and sorting were able to separate the samples to a higher degree than DA. With regards to the two data analysis techniques for sorting data, samples were found to group more tightly when analyzed by DISTATIS compared to MDS. Even for visually different samples, product maps changed over the replicates in the PM and sorting tasks, indicating that assessors changed their evaluation criteria when performing a holistic product evaluation.

AB - In this study the ability of three sensory methods to describe differences among visual stimuli was evaluated. We compared the two fast alternative sensory methods, projective mapping (PM) and sorting, to a generic descriptive analysis (DA), using visually different pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes. Thirty-two pictures of different fruit and vegetable mixes were evaluated by two different panels (11 assessors each) using the three sensory methods. The results were compared to each other to find which of the two alternative descriptive methods, PM and sorting, lead to most similar results compared to DA. Further, the effect of replicate evaluations in fast alternative methods was assessed for visual stimuli, where the 11 assessors, conducting both the PM and sorting tasks, evaluated all pictures in duplicates. Last, an alternative analysis method to multidimensional scaling (MDS) for sorting data was evaluated, to elucidate if more detailed results could be obtained with the alternative DISTATIS procedure. Compared to DA, results obtained from both sorting and PM were similar, and similar main conclusions could be drawn from all three sensory methods. However, both PM and sorting were able to separate the samples to a higher degree than DA. With regards to the two data analysis techniques for sorting data, samples were found to group more tightly when analyzed by DISTATIS compared to MDS. Even for visually different samples, product maps changed over the replicates in the PM and sorting tasks, indicating that assessors changed their evaluation criteria when performing a holistic product evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897779100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897779100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897779100

VL - 35

SP - 86

EP - 94

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -