Comparison of different erosion control techniques in the Hyrcanian forest in northern Iran

Ali Masumian, Ramin Naghdi, Eric K. Zenner, Mehrdad Nikooy, Majid Lotfalian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of closure best management practices (BMPs) on runoff volume and soil loss on skid trails that received two densities of soil cover mats and were located on two slope gradients in an Iranian temperate mountainous forest. The treatments included combinations of three closure BMPs (water bar only, water bar + sawdust, and water bar + hardwood slash), two amounts (densities) of mats (7.5 and 15 kg·m–2), and two levels of slope gradients (≤ 20% and > 20%). Results showed that the water bar treatment was the least effective erosion control treatment, followed by the hardwood slash and sawdust treatments. Averaged over mat densities and both slope gradients, the average runoff rates and amounts of soil loss from the skid trails with the water bar treatment were 46.7 l per plot and 6.1 g·m–2, respectively, 16.8 l per plot, 2.8 g·m–2, respectively, with the hardwood slash treatment and 11.7 l per plot, 1.9 g·m–2, respectively, with the sawdust treatment. The results indicated that surface cover is a necessary element for controlling erosion losses following a skidding disturbance, particularly on steep slopes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-554
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Forest Science
Volume63
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

erosion control
Iran
slash
sawdust
hardwood
best management practices
best management practice
man-made trails
water
runoff
methodology
soil density
soil cover
temperate forests
transposons
soil
comparison
erosion
disturbance
loss

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Masumian, Ali ; Naghdi, Ramin ; Zenner, Eric K. ; Nikooy, Mehrdad ; Lotfalian, Majid. / Comparison of different erosion control techniques in the Hyrcanian forest in northern Iran. In: Journal of Forest Science. 2017 ; Vol. 63, No. 12. pp. 549-554.
@article{63aa7a8880df40caa23e15b424b9c00e,
title = "Comparison of different erosion control techniques in the Hyrcanian forest in northern Iran",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of closure best management practices (BMPs) on runoff volume and soil loss on skid trails that received two densities of soil cover mats and were located on two slope gradients in an Iranian temperate mountainous forest. The treatments included combinations of three closure BMPs (water bar only, water bar + sawdust, and water bar + hardwood slash), two amounts (densities) of mats (7.5 and 15 kg·m–2), and two levels of slope gradients (≤ 20{\%} and > 20{\%}). Results showed that the water bar treatment was the least effective erosion control treatment, followed by the hardwood slash and sawdust treatments. Averaged over mat densities and both slope gradients, the average runoff rates and amounts of soil loss from the skid trails with the water bar treatment were 46.7 l per plot and 6.1 g·m–2, respectively, 16.8 l per plot, 2.8 g·m–2, respectively, with the hardwood slash treatment and 11.7 l per plot, 1.9 g·m–2, respectively, with the sawdust treatment. The results indicated that surface cover is a necessary element for controlling erosion losses following a skidding disturbance, particularly on steep slopes.",
author = "Ali Masumian and Ramin Naghdi and Zenner, {Eric K.} and Mehrdad Nikooy and Majid Lotfalian",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17221/121/2017-JFS",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "549--554",
journal = "Journal of Forest Science",
issn = "1212-4834",
publisher = "Institute of Agricultural and Food Information",
number = "12",

}

Comparison of different erosion control techniques in the Hyrcanian forest in northern Iran. / Masumian, Ali; Naghdi, Ramin; Zenner, Eric K.; Nikooy, Mehrdad; Lotfalian, Majid.

In: Journal of Forest Science, Vol. 63, No. 12, 01.01.2017, p. 549-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different erosion control techniques in the Hyrcanian forest in northern Iran

AU - Masumian, Ali

AU - Naghdi, Ramin

AU - Zenner, Eric K.

AU - Nikooy, Mehrdad

AU - Lotfalian, Majid

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of closure best management practices (BMPs) on runoff volume and soil loss on skid trails that received two densities of soil cover mats and were located on two slope gradients in an Iranian temperate mountainous forest. The treatments included combinations of three closure BMPs (water bar only, water bar + sawdust, and water bar + hardwood slash), two amounts (densities) of mats (7.5 and 15 kg·m–2), and two levels of slope gradients (≤ 20% and > 20%). Results showed that the water bar treatment was the least effective erosion control treatment, followed by the hardwood slash and sawdust treatments. Averaged over mat densities and both slope gradients, the average runoff rates and amounts of soil loss from the skid trails with the water bar treatment were 46.7 l per plot and 6.1 g·m–2, respectively, 16.8 l per plot, 2.8 g·m–2, respectively, with the hardwood slash treatment and 11.7 l per plot, 1.9 g·m–2, respectively, with the sawdust treatment. The results indicated that surface cover is a necessary element for controlling erosion losses following a skidding disturbance, particularly on steep slopes.

AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of closure best management practices (BMPs) on runoff volume and soil loss on skid trails that received two densities of soil cover mats and were located on two slope gradients in an Iranian temperate mountainous forest. The treatments included combinations of three closure BMPs (water bar only, water bar + sawdust, and water bar + hardwood slash), two amounts (densities) of mats (7.5 and 15 kg·m–2), and two levels of slope gradients (≤ 20% and > 20%). Results showed that the water bar treatment was the least effective erosion control treatment, followed by the hardwood slash and sawdust treatments. Averaged over mat densities and both slope gradients, the average runoff rates and amounts of soil loss from the skid trails with the water bar treatment were 46.7 l per plot and 6.1 g·m–2, respectively, 16.8 l per plot, 2.8 g·m–2, respectively, with the hardwood slash treatment and 11.7 l per plot, 1.9 g·m–2, respectively, with the sawdust treatment. The results indicated that surface cover is a necessary element for controlling erosion losses following a skidding disturbance, particularly on steep slopes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038902206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038902206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17221/121/2017-JFS

DO - 10.17221/121/2017-JFS

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038902206

VL - 63

SP - 549

EP - 554

JO - Journal of Forest Science

JF - Journal of Forest Science

SN - 1212-4834

IS - 12

ER -