Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions

M. J. Citardi, B. Herrmann, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, B. C. Stack, M. Cooper, R. D. Bucholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-11
Number of pages7
JournalSkull Base
Volume11
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Tomography
Cephalometry
Technology
Carbon Monoxide
Skull
Anatomy
Software
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Citardi, M. J. ; Herrmann, B. ; Hollenbeak, Christopher S. ; Stack, B. C. ; Cooper, M. ; Bucholz, R. D. / Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions. In: Skull Base. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 5-11.
@article{dfae9b8a563a4323999465bb60bfca1a,
title = "Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions",
abstract = "Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.",
author = "Citardi, {M. J.} and B. Herrmann and Hollenbeak, {Christopher S.} and Stack, {B. C.} and M. Cooper and Bucholz, {R. D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "5--11",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base",
issn = "2193-6331",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions. / Citardi, M. J.; Herrmann, B.; Hollenbeak, Christopher S.; Stack, B. C.; Cooper, M.; Bucholz, R. D.

In: Skull Base, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 5-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions

AU - Citardi, M. J.

AU - Herrmann, B.

AU - Hollenbeak, Christopher S.

AU - Stack, B. C.

AU - Cooper, M.

AU - Bucholz, R. D.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.

AB - Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035042305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035042305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17167599

AN - SCOPUS:0035042305

VL - 11

SP - 5

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

SN - 2193-6331

IS - 1

ER -