Comparison of semi-quantitative and formal metrics for multi-zone airflow model quality assessment

William P. Bahnfleth, Pongpeera Saekow, Joseph Firrantello, Paul A. Kremer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Multi-zone air and contaminant flow models of actual buildings have many practical and scientific uses, such as estimating air leakage rates, predicting exposure to contaminants, and studying ventilation controls to name only a few. A multi-zone model is an abstraction that may predict performance that differs from observed behavior of an actual building due to inaccuracy or uncertainty in inputs, (e.g., envelope leakiness, and mechanical ventilation rates) or to non-uniform airflow and contaminant distributions in spaces. To ensure close agreement between model and actual building, a procedure for calibrating (equivalently, tuning) the model by adjusting model parameters based on measurements in the actual building is needed. A method for calibrating multi-zone airflow models using a semi-empirical metric (defined as the fraction of correct interzonal airflow directions) has been subjected to a number of field tests with encouraging results, i.e., the metric value increased as a result of calibration. Given the ad hoc nature of this metric, it is important to investigate whether its improvement is corroborated by a more rigorous standard of quality. At present, ASTM Standard D5157 (Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Indoor Air Quality Models), which defines model quality on the basis of predicted and measured concentrations, is available for that purpose. In the present study, model calibration using the interzonal airflow direction metric and ASTM Standard D5157 evaluations of CO 2 tracer gas releases at several measurement locations were conducted in two test buildings on a university campus. ASTM Standard D5157 results showed measureable improvement in model quality, which suggests that the semi-empirical metric is useful for its intended purpose. A secondary result of the study was the recognition that ASTM Standard D5157 in its current form is difficult to interpret when applied to whole buildings with multiple spaces. Consideration should be given to making ASTM Standard D5157 more suitable for evaluating complex buildings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-263
Number of pages12
JournalHVAC and R Research
Volume18
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Impurities
Calibration
Leakage (fluid)
Carbon Monoxide
Air
Air quality
Ventilation
Tuning
Gases
Direction compound
Uncertainty
Artificial Respiration

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Bahnfleth, William P. ; Saekow, Pongpeera ; Firrantello, Joseph ; Kremer, Paul A. / Comparison of semi-quantitative and formal metrics for multi-zone airflow model quality assessment. In: HVAC and R Research. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 1-2. pp. 252-263.
@article{1aae2fe68f2c4fd5a55a07d3806d296e,
title = "Comparison of semi-quantitative and formal metrics for multi-zone airflow model quality assessment",
abstract = "Multi-zone air and contaminant flow models of actual buildings have many practical and scientific uses, such as estimating air leakage rates, predicting exposure to contaminants, and studying ventilation controls to name only a few. A multi-zone model is an abstraction that may predict performance that differs from observed behavior of an actual building due to inaccuracy or uncertainty in inputs, (e.g., envelope leakiness, and mechanical ventilation rates) or to non-uniform airflow and contaminant distributions in spaces. To ensure close agreement between model and actual building, a procedure for calibrating (equivalently, tuning) the model by adjusting model parameters based on measurements in the actual building is needed. A method for calibrating multi-zone airflow models using a semi-empirical metric (defined as the fraction of correct interzonal airflow directions) has been subjected to a number of field tests with encouraging results, i.e., the metric value increased as a result of calibration. Given the ad hoc nature of this metric, it is important to investigate whether its improvement is corroborated by a more rigorous standard of quality. At present, ASTM Standard D5157 (Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Indoor Air Quality Models), which defines model quality on the basis of predicted and measured concentrations, is available for that purpose. In the present study, model calibration using the interzonal airflow direction metric and ASTM Standard D5157 evaluations of CO 2 tracer gas releases at several measurement locations were conducted in two test buildings on a university campus. ASTM Standard D5157 results showed measureable improvement in model quality, which suggests that the semi-empirical metric is useful for its intended purpose. A secondary result of the study was the recognition that ASTM Standard D5157 in its current form is difficult to interpret when applied to whole buildings with multiple spaces. Consideration should be given to making ASTM Standard D5157 more suitable for evaluating complex buildings.",
author = "Bahnfleth, {William P.} and Pongpeera Saekow and Joseph Firrantello and Kremer, {Paul A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10789669.2011.577726",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "252--263",
journal = "Science and Technology for the Built Environment",
issn = "2374-4731",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

Comparison of semi-quantitative and formal metrics for multi-zone airflow model quality assessment. / Bahnfleth, William P.; Saekow, Pongpeera; Firrantello, Joseph; Kremer, Paul A.

In: HVAC and R Research, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, 01.02.2012, p. 252-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of semi-quantitative and formal metrics for multi-zone airflow model quality assessment

AU - Bahnfleth, William P.

AU - Saekow, Pongpeera

AU - Firrantello, Joseph

AU - Kremer, Paul A.

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Multi-zone air and contaminant flow models of actual buildings have many practical and scientific uses, such as estimating air leakage rates, predicting exposure to contaminants, and studying ventilation controls to name only a few. A multi-zone model is an abstraction that may predict performance that differs from observed behavior of an actual building due to inaccuracy or uncertainty in inputs, (e.g., envelope leakiness, and mechanical ventilation rates) or to non-uniform airflow and contaminant distributions in spaces. To ensure close agreement between model and actual building, a procedure for calibrating (equivalently, tuning) the model by adjusting model parameters based on measurements in the actual building is needed. A method for calibrating multi-zone airflow models using a semi-empirical metric (defined as the fraction of correct interzonal airflow directions) has been subjected to a number of field tests with encouraging results, i.e., the metric value increased as a result of calibration. Given the ad hoc nature of this metric, it is important to investigate whether its improvement is corroborated by a more rigorous standard of quality. At present, ASTM Standard D5157 (Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Indoor Air Quality Models), which defines model quality on the basis of predicted and measured concentrations, is available for that purpose. In the present study, model calibration using the interzonal airflow direction metric and ASTM Standard D5157 evaluations of CO 2 tracer gas releases at several measurement locations were conducted in two test buildings on a university campus. ASTM Standard D5157 results showed measureable improvement in model quality, which suggests that the semi-empirical metric is useful for its intended purpose. A secondary result of the study was the recognition that ASTM Standard D5157 in its current form is difficult to interpret when applied to whole buildings with multiple spaces. Consideration should be given to making ASTM Standard D5157 more suitable for evaluating complex buildings.

AB - Multi-zone air and contaminant flow models of actual buildings have many practical and scientific uses, such as estimating air leakage rates, predicting exposure to contaminants, and studying ventilation controls to name only a few. A multi-zone model is an abstraction that may predict performance that differs from observed behavior of an actual building due to inaccuracy or uncertainty in inputs, (e.g., envelope leakiness, and mechanical ventilation rates) or to non-uniform airflow and contaminant distributions in spaces. To ensure close agreement between model and actual building, a procedure for calibrating (equivalently, tuning) the model by adjusting model parameters based on measurements in the actual building is needed. A method for calibrating multi-zone airflow models using a semi-empirical metric (defined as the fraction of correct interzonal airflow directions) has been subjected to a number of field tests with encouraging results, i.e., the metric value increased as a result of calibration. Given the ad hoc nature of this metric, it is important to investigate whether its improvement is corroborated by a more rigorous standard of quality. At present, ASTM Standard D5157 (Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Indoor Air Quality Models), which defines model quality on the basis of predicted and measured concentrations, is available for that purpose. In the present study, model calibration using the interzonal airflow direction metric and ASTM Standard D5157 evaluations of CO 2 tracer gas releases at several measurement locations were conducted in two test buildings on a university campus. ASTM Standard D5157 results showed measureable improvement in model quality, which suggests that the semi-empirical metric is useful for its intended purpose. A secondary result of the study was the recognition that ASTM Standard D5157 in its current form is difficult to interpret when applied to whole buildings with multiple spaces. Consideration should be given to making ASTM Standard D5157 more suitable for evaluating complex buildings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860790505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860790505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10789669.2011.577726

DO - 10.1080/10789669.2011.577726

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860790505

VL - 18

SP - 252

EP - 263

JO - Science and Technology for the Built Environment

JF - Science and Technology for the Built Environment

SN - 2374-4731

IS - 1-2

ER -