Comparisons of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing builds through experimental in situ distortion and temperature measurements

Alexander J. Dunbar, Erik R. Denlinger, Michael F. Gouge, Timothy W. Simpson, Pan Michaleris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In situ experimental measurements of the laser powder bed fusion build process are completed with the goal gaining insight into the evolution of distortion in the powder bed fusion build process. Utilizing a novel enclosed instrumented system, five experimental builds are performed. Experimental builds compare materials: Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel ® 718, differing build geometries, and manufacturing machines: EOS M280 and Renishaw AM250. A combination of in situ measurements of distortion and temperature and post-build measurements of final part geometry are used to compare and contrast the different experiments. Experimental results show that builds completed using Inconel ® 718 distort between 50% and 80% more relative to Ti–6Al–4V depending on substrate size and build geometry. The experimental build completed on the Renishaw AM250 distorted 10.6% more in the Z direction when compared with the identical build completed on the EOS M280 machine. Comparisons of post-build XY cross-sectional area show a 0.3% contraction from the predefined build geometry for the Renishaw AM250 as compared with the 4.5% contraction for the part built using the EOS M280. Recommendations and future work are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalAdditive Manufacturing
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

3D printers
Temperature measurement
Powders
Fusion reactions
Geometry
Lasers
Substrates
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{665ee3e58eae4c8d8cb9889741178c7e,
title = "Comparisons of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing builds through experimental in situ distortion and temperature measurements",
abstract = "In situ experimental measurements of the laser powder bed fusion build process are completed with the goal gaining insight into the evolution of distortion in the powder bed fusion build process. Utilizing a novel enclosed instrumented system, five experimental builds are performed. Experimental builds compare materials: Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel {\circledR} 718, differing build geometries, and manufacturing machines: EOS M280 and Renishaw AM250. A combination of in situ measurements of distortion and temperature and post-build measurements of final part geometry are used to compare and contrast the different experiments. Experimental results show that builds completed using Inconel {\circledR} 718 distort between 50{\%} and 80{\%} more relative to Ti–6Al–4V depending on substrate size and build geometry. The experimental build completed on the Renishaw AM250 distorted 10.6{\%} more in the Z direction when compared with the identical build completed on the EOS M280 machine. Comparisons of post-build XY cross-sectional area show a 0.3{\%} contraction from the predefined build geometry for the Renishaw AM250 as compared with the 4.5{\%} contraction for the part built using the EOS M280. Recommendations and future work are also discussed.",
author = "Dunbar, {Alexander J.} and Denlinger, {Erik R.} and Gouge, {Michael F.} and Simpson, {Timothy W.} and Pan Michaleris",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "57--65",
journal = "Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2214-8604",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Comparisons of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing builds through experimental in situ distortion and temperature measurements. / Dunbar, Alexander J.; Denlinger, Erik R.; Gouge, Michael F.; Simpson, Timothy W.; Michaleris, Pan.

In: Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 15, 01.05.2017, p. 57-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing builds through experimental in situ distortion and temperature measurements

AU - Dunbar, Alexander J.

AU - Denlinger, Erik R.

AU - Gouge, Michael F.

AU - Simpson, Timothy W.

AU - Michaleris, Pan

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - In situ experimental measurements of the laser powder bed fusion build process are completed with the goal gaining insight into the evolution of distortion in the powder bed fusion build process. Utilizing a novel enclosed instrumented system, five experimental builds are performed. Experimental builds compare materials: Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel ® 718, differing build geometries, and manufacturing machines: EOS M280 and Renishaw AM250. A combination of in situ measurements of distortion and temperature and post-build measurements of final part geometry are used to compare and contrast the different experiments. Experimental results show that builds completed using Inconel ® 718 distort between 50% and 80% more relative to Ti–6Al–4V depending on substrate size and build geometry. The experimental build completed on the Renishaw AM250 distorted 10.6% more in the Z direction when compared with the identical build completed on the EOS M280 machine. Comparisons of post-build XY cross-sectional area show a 0.3% contraction from the predefined build geometry for the Renishaw AM250 as compared with the 4.5% contraction for the part built using the EOS M280. Recommendations and future work are also discussed.

AB - In situ experimental measurements of the laser powder bed fusion build process are completed with the goal gaining insight into the evolution of distortion in the powder bed fusion build process. Utilizing a novel enclosed instrumented system, five experimental builds are performed. Experimental builds compare materials: Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel ® 718, differing build geometries, and manufacturing machines: EOS M280 and Renishaw AM250. A combination of in situ measurements of distortion and temperature and post-build measurements of final part geometry are used to compare and contrast the different experiments. Experimental results show that builds completed using Inconel ® 718 distort between 50% and 80% more relative to Ti–6Al–4V depending on substrate size and build geometry. The experimental build completed on the Renishaw AM250 distorted 10.6% more in the Z direction when compared with the identical build completed on the EOS M280 machine. Comparisons of post-build XY cross-sectional area show a 0.3% contraction from the predefined build geometry for the Renishaw AM250 as compared with the 4.5% contraction for the part built using the EOS M280. Recommendations and future work are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016413864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016413864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016413864

VL - 15

SP - 57

EP - 65

JO - Additive Manufacturing

JF - Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2214-8604

ER -