Competition in the telecommunications industry: A new global paradigm and its limits

Eileen M. Trauth, Douglas Pitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ascendancy of competition in the telecommunications industry suggests the emergence of a new public policy paradigm. By tracing the progress of two first movers - the United States and the United Kingdom - the technological, industrial and economic pressures for change can be observed. In this paper we present the underlying assumptions, effects and expected benefits of the competitive paradigm. We argue, however, that the outcomes experienced by early adopters of this paradigm may not be the same for later entrants. Evidence from other industries, economic development theory, and social equity literature questions the assumption that all nations should progress along identical telecommunications policy paths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Information Technology
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992

Fingerprint

Telecommunication industry
telecommunication
paradigm
Economics
industry
Telecommunication
development theory
economic theory
equity
public policy
Industry
evidence
economics
Telecommunications industry
Paradigm

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{9575d394c82c4891a2cbfad2423f844b,
title = "Competition in the telecommunications industry: A new global paradigm and its limits",
abstract = "The ascendancy of competition in the telecommunications industry suggests the emergence of a new public policy paradigm. By tracing the progress of two first movers - the United States and the United Kingdom - the technological, industrial and economic pressures for change can be observed. In this paper we present the underlying assumptions, effects and expected benefits of the competitive paradigm. We argue, however, that the outcomes experienced by early adopters of this paradigm may not be the same for later entrants. Evidence from other industries, economic development theory, and social equity literature questions the assumption that all nations should progress along identical telecommunications policy paths.",
author = "Trauth, {Eileen M.} and Douglas Pitt",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1057/jit.1992.2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Journal of Information Technology",
issn = "0268-3962",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Competition in the telecommunications industry : A new global paradigm and its limits. / Trauth, Eileen M.; Pitt, Douglas.

In: Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 03.1992, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competition in the telecommunications industry

T2 - A new global paradigm and its limits

AU - Trauth, Eileen M.

AU - Pitt, Douglas

PY - 1992/3

Y1 - 1992/3

N2 - The ascendancy of competition in the telecommunications industry suggests the emergence of a new public policy paradigm. By tracing the progress of two first movers - the United States and the United Kingdom - the technological, industrial and economic pressures for change can be observed. In this paper we present the underlying assumptions, effects and expected benefits of the competitive paradigm. We argue, however, that the outcomes experienced by early adopters of this paradigm may not be the same for later entrants. Evidence from other industries, economic development theory, and social equity literature questions the assumption that all nations should progress along identical telecommunications policy paths.

AB - The ascendancy of competition in the telecommunications industry suggests the emergence of a new public policy paradigm. By tracing the progress of two first movers - the United States and the United Kingdom - the technological, industrial and economic pressures for change can be observed. In this paper we present the underlying assumptions, effects and expected benefits of the competitive paradigm. We argue, however, that the outcomes experienced by early adopters of this paradigm may not be the same for later entrants. Evidence from other industries, economic development theory, and social equity literature questions the assumption that all nations should progress along identical telecommunications policy paths.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549116162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71549116162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/jit.1992.2

DO - 10.1057/jit.1992.2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:71549116162

VL - 7

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Information Technology

JF - Journal of Information Technology

SN - 0268-3962

IS - 1

ER -