Complementation, genetic conflict, and the evolution of sex and recombination

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The existence of sexual reproduction is difficult to explain because the 2-fold cost of meiosis requires a compensatory 2-fold advantage that is difficult to prove. Here, I show that asexual reproduction has a short-term disadvantage due to the loss of complementation of recessive deleterious mutations, which can overcome the 2-fold cost of meiosis in one or few generations. This complementation hypothesis can also explain why most asexual species are polyploid, why only certain types of asexual reproduction exist, why meiosis is not one-step, and the origin of amphimixis. I also show that the promotion of variation by recombination is not necessary to explain the evolution of amphimixis. Instead, recombination can be the result of an intragenomic conflict between alleles that induce the initiation of crossing over and alleles that evolve to resist that initiation. Thus recombination does not require any advantage at the individual or population level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S21-S33
JournalJournal of Heredity
Volume101
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Molecular Evolution
Meiosis
Asexual Reproduction
Genetic Recombination
Alleles
Costs and Cost Analysis
Polyploidy
Reproduction
Mutation
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

@article{c85606b07e5a4a1d92c665f59e3ae9b4,
title = "Complementation, genetic conflict, and the evolution of sex and recombination",
abstract = "The existence of sexual reproduction is difficult to explain because the 2-fold cost of meiosis requires a compensatory 2-fold advantage that is difficult to prove. Here, I show that asexual reproduction has a short-term disadvantage due to the loss of complementation of recessive deleterious mutations, which can overcome the 2-fold cost of meiosis in one or few generations. This complementation hypothesis can also explain why most asexual species are polyploid, why only certain types of asexual reproduction exist, why meiosis is not one-step, and the origin of amphimixis. I also show that the promotion of variation by recombination is not necessary to explain the evolution of amphimixis. Instead, recombination can be the result of an intragenomic conflict between alleles that induce the initiation of crossing over and alleles that evolve to resist that initiation. Thus recombination does not require any advantage at the individual or population level.",
author = "Marco Archetti",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jhered/esq009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "S21--S33",
journal = "Journal of Heredity",
issn = "0022-1503",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Complementation, genetic conflict, and the evolution of sex and recombination. / Archetti, Marco.

In: Journal of Heredity, Vol. 101, No. SUPPL. 1, 01.03.2010, p. S21-S33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementation, genetic conflict, and the evolution of sex and recombination

AU - Archetti, Marco

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - The existence of sexual reproduction is difficult to explain because the 2-fold cost of meiosis requires a compensatory 2-fold advantage that is difficult to prove. Here, I show that asexual reproduction has a short-term disadvantage due to the loss of complementation of recessive deleterious mutations, which can overcome the 2-fold cost of meiosis in one or few generations. This complementation hypothesis can also explain why most asexual species are polyploid, why only certain types of asexual reproduction exist, why meiosis is not one-step, and the origin of amphimixis. I also show that the promotion of variation by recombination is not necessary to explain the evolution of amphimixis. Instead, recombination can be the result of an intragenomic conflict between alleles that induce the initiation of crossing over and alleles that evolve to resist that initiation. Thus recombination does not require any advantage at the individual or population level.

AB - The existence of sexual reproduction is difficult to explain because the 2-fold cost of meiosis requires a compensatory 2-fold advantage that is difficult to prove. Here, I show that asexual reproduction has a short-term disadvantage due to the loss of complementation of recessive deleterious mutations, which can overcome the 2-fold cost of meiosis in one or few generations. This complementation hypothesis can also explain why most asexual species are polyploid, why only certain types of asexual reproduction exist, why meiosis is not one-step, and the origin of amphimixis. I also show that the promotion of variation by recombination is not necessary to explain the evolution of amphimixis. Instead, recombination can be the result of an intragenomic conflict between alleles that induce the initiation of crossing over and alleles that evolve to resist that initiation. Thus recombination does not require any advantage at the individual or population level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952001877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952001877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jhered/esq009

DO - 10.1093/jhered/esq009

M3 - Article

C2 - 20200138

AN - SCOPUS:77952001877

VL - 101

SP - S21-S33

JO - Journal of Heredity

JF - Journal of Heredity

SN - 0022-1503

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -