Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management

Robert R. Schindelbeck, Harold M. van Es, George S. Abawi, David W. Wolfe, Thomas L. Whitlow, Beth Krueger Gugino, Omololu J. Idowu, Bianca N. Moebius-Clune

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Approaches to measuring air and water quality are well established, but soil quality assessment protocols to be used in landscape monitoring efforts are largely non-existent. The concept of soil quality represents the integration of the physical, biological, and chemical aspects of soils. Limited attention has been given to the holistic assessment of soil quality in landscape and urban planning, as it is typically addressed only through chemical analyses. We describe the process used for the selection of soil quality indicators that are being offered as part of the new Cornell Soil Health Test. Over 1500 samples were collected from agricultural landscapes, including controlled experiments, and analyzed for 39 potential soil quality indicators. Four physical and four biological soil indicators were selected based on sensitivity to management, relevance to functional soil processes, ease and cost of sampling, and cost of analysis. Seven chemical indicators were selected as they constitute the standard soil fertility test. For potentially contaminated sites, additional chemical indicators were considered through a total elemental analysis. Test reports were developed to allow for overall soil quality assessment and the identification of specific soil constraints that may be remedied through management practices. The use of the new soil quality test is exemplified for three landscape scenarios in New York State: a vegetable farm, a town park, and a vacant urban lot. The protocol provides a comprehensive assessment of the soil's ability to perform critical environmental functions at a relatively modest cost, and it helps target management and remediation approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-80
Number of pages8
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume88
Issue number2-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

soil quality
soil
cost
landscape planning
urban management
landscape management
urban planning
soil fertility
vegetable
management practice
air quality
remediation
agricultural land
indicator
farm
water quality
test
chemical
sampling
monitoring

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Schindelbeck, R. R., van Es, H. M., Abawi, G. S., Wolfe, D. W., Whitlow, T. L., Gugino, B. K., ... Moebius-Clune, B. N. (2008). Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 88(2-4), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.006
Schindelbeck, Robert R. ; van Es, Harold M. ; Abawi, George S. ; Wolfe, David W. ; Whitlow, Thomas L. ; Gugino, Beth Krueger ; Idowu, Omololu J. ; Moebius-Clune, Bianca N. / Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2008 ; Vol. 88, No. 2-4. pp. 73-80.
@article{2925cf3ef928484fa926c18f158282b0,
title = "Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management",
abstract = "Approaches to measuring air and water quality are well established, but soil quality assessment protocols to be used in landscape monitoring efforts are largely non-existent. The concept of soil quality represents the integration of the physical, biological, and chemical aspects of soils. Limited attention has been given to the holistic assessment of soil quality in landscape and urban planning, as it is typically addressed only through chemical analyses. We describe the process used for the selection of soil quality indicators that are being offered as part of the new Cornell Soil Health Test. Over 1500 samples were collected from agricultural landscapes, including controlled experiments, and analyzed for 39 potential soil quality indicators. Four physical and four biological soil indicators were selected based on sensitivity to management, relevance to functional soil processes, ease and cost of sampling, and cost of analysis. Seven chemical indicators were selected as they constitute the standard soil fertility test. For potentially contaminated sites, additional chemical indicators were considered through a total elemental analysis. Test reports were developed to allow for overall soil quality assessment and the identification of specific soil constraints that may be remedied through management practices. The use of the new soil quality test is exemplified for three landscape scenarios in New York State: a vegetable farm, a town park, and a vacant urban lot. The protocol provides a comprehensive assessment of the soil's ability to perform critical environmental functions at a relatively modest cost, and it helps target management and remediation approaches.",
author = "Schindelbeck, {Robert R.} and {van Es}, {Harold M.} and Abawi, {George S.} and Wolfe, {David W.} and Whitlow, {Thomas L.} and Gugino, {Beth Krueger} and Idowu, {Omololu J.} and Moebius-Clune, {Bianca N.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "73--80",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-4",

}

Schindelbeck, RR, van Es, HM, Abawi, GS, Wolfe, DW, Whitlow, TL, Gugino, BK, Idowu, OJ & Moebius-Clune, BN 2008, 'Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management', Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 88, no. 2-4, pp. 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.006

Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management. / Schindelbeck, Robert R.; van Es, Harold M.; Abawi, George S.; Wolfe, David W.; Whitlow, Thomas L.; Gugino, Beth Krueger; Idowu, Omololu J.; Moebius-Clune, Bianca N.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 88, No. 2-4, 01.12.2008, p. 73-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management

AU - Schindelbeck, Robert R.

AU - van Es, Harold M.

AU - Abawi, George S.

AU - Wolfe, David W.

AU - Whitlow, Thomas L.

AU - Gugino, Beth Krueger

AU - Idowu, Omololu J.

AU - Moebius-Clune, Bianca N.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Approaches to measuring air and water quality are well established, but soil quality assessment protocols to be used in landscape monitoring efforts are largely non-existent. The concept of soil quality represents the integration of the physical, biological, and chemical aspects of soils. Limited attention has been given to the holistic assessment of soil quality in landscape and urban planning, as it is typically addressed only through chemical analyses. We describe the process used for the selection of soil quality indicators that are being offered as part of the new Cornell Soil Health Test. Over 1500 samples were collected from agricultural landscapes, including controlled experiments, and analyzed for 39 potential soil quality indicators. Four physical and four biological soil indicators were selected based on sensitivity to management, relevance to functional soil processes, ease and cost of sampling, and cost of analysis. Seven chemical indicators were selected as they constitute the standard soil fertility test. For potentially contaminated sites, additional chemical indicators were considered through a total elemental analysis. Test reports were developed to allow for overall soil quality assessment and the identification of specific soil constraints that may be remedied through management practices. The use of the new soil quality test is exemplified for three landscape scenarios in New York State: a vegetable farm, a town park, and a vacant urban lot. The protocol provides a comprehensive assessment of the soil's ability to perform critical environmental functions at a relatively modest cost, and it helps target management and remediation approaches.

AB - Approaches to measuring air and water quality are well established, but soil quality assessment protocols to be used in landscape monitoring efforts are largely non-existent. The concept of soil quality represents the integration of the physical, biological, and chemical aspects of soils. Limited attention has been given to the holistic assessment of soil quality in landscape and urban planning, as it is typically addressed only through chemical analyses. We describe the process used for the selection of soil quality indicators that are being offered as part of the new Cornell Soil Health Test. Over 1500 samples were collected from agricultural landscapes, including controlled experiments, and analyzed for 39 potential soil quality indicators. Four physical and four biological soil indicators were selected based on sensitivity to management, relevance to functional soil processes, ease and cost of sampling, and cost of analysis. Seven chemical indicators were selected as they constitute the standard soil fertility test. For potentially contaminated sites, additional chemical indicators were considered through a total elemental analysis. Test reports were developed to allow for overall soil quality assessment and the identification of specific soil constraints that may be remedied through management practices. The use of the new soil quality test is exemplified for three landscape scenarios in New York State: a vegetable farm, a town park, and a vacant urban lot. The protocol provides a comprehensive assessment of the soil's ability to perform critical environmental functions at a relatively modest cost, and it helps target management and remediation approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54149086488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54149086488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 73

EP - 80

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 2-4

ER -