Concept analysis

examining the state of the science.

Judith E. Hupcey, Janice Penrod

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As methods for analyzing concepts have proliferated in nursing, a critical methodological issue has arisen. Analytic techniques for examining conceptual meaning have incorporated varied strategies for advancing the concept under the rubric of concept analysis, concept development, and theory building. The authors argue that this evolution has created methodological confusion. Following a discussion of a conceptualization of concepts and concept-theory-truth linkages, methods of concept analysis are critiqued in terms of the purpose and the nature of the findings produced by analyses using both traditional and emergent methods. The authors argue that concept analysis is a process of strategic examination of the scientific literature that results in an integrated perspective of the state of the science, or what is known about the concept. In contrast, concept advancement refers to techniques that emphasize the synthesis of new or deeper knowledge that is relevant to the discipline. The authors conclude that disentangling concept analysis from techniques for concept advancement is critical to enhancing the utility of concept-based research in nursing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-208
Number of pages12
JournalResearch and theory for nursing practice
Volume19
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Literature
Nursing Research
Nursing

Cite this

@article{17f746a752e54052985c8013926b602e,
title = "Concept analysis: examining the state of the science.",
abstract = "As methods for analyzing concepts have proliferated in nursing, a critical methodological issue has arisen. Analytic techniques for examining conceptual meaning have incorporated varied strategies for advancing the concept under the rubric of concept analysis, concept development, and theory building. The authors argue that this evolution has created methodological confusion. Following a discussion of a conceptualization of concepts and concept-theory-truth linkages, methods of concept analysis are critiqued in terms of the purpose and the nature of the findings produced by analyses using both traditional and emergent methods. The authors argue that concept analysis is a process of strategic examination of the scientific literature that results in an integrated perspective of the state of the science, or what is known about the concept. In contrast, concept advancement refers to techniques that emphasize the synthesis of new or deeper knowledge that is relevant to the discipline. The authors conclude that disentangling concept analysis from techniques for concept advancement is critical to enhancing the utility of concept-based research in nursing.",
author = "Hupcey, {Judith E.} and Janice Penrod",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "197--208",
journal = "Research and theory for nursing practice",
issn = "1541-6577",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

Concept analysis : examining the state of the science. / Hupcey, Judith E.; Penrod, Janice.

In: Research and theory for nursing practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2005, p. 197-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concept analysis

T2 - examining the state of the science.

AU - Hupcey, Judith E.

AU - Penrod, Janice

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - As methods for analyzing concepts have proliferated in nursing, a critical methodological issue has arisen. Analytic techniques for examining conceptual meaning have incorporated varied strategies for advancing the concept under the rubric of concept analysis, concept development, and theory building. The authors argue that this evolution has created methodological confusion. Following a discussion of a conceptualization of concepts and concept-theory-truth linkages, methods of concept analysis are critiqued in terms of the purpose and the nature of the findings produced by analyses using both traditional and emergent methods. The authors argue that concept analysis is a process of strategic examination of the scientific literature that results in an integrated perspective of the state of the science, or what is known about the concept. In contrast, concept advancement refers to techniques that emphasize the synthesis of new or deeper knowledge that is relevant to the discipline. The authors conclude that disentangling concept analysis from techniques for concept advancement is critical to enhancing the utility of concept-based research in nursing.

AB - As methods for analyzing concepts have proliferated in nursing, a critical methodological issue has arisen. Analytic techniques for examining conceptual meaning have incorporated varied strategies for advancing the concept under the rubric of concept analysis, concept development, and theory building. The authors argue that this evolution has created methodological confusion. Following a discussion of a conceptualization of concepts and concept-theory-truth linkages, methods of concept analysis are critiqued in terms of the purpose and the nature of the findings produced by analyses using both traditional and emergent methods. The authors argue that concept analysis is a process of strategic examination of the scientific literature that results in an integrated perspective of the state of the science, or what is known about the concept. In contrast, concept advancement refers to techniques that emphasize the synthesis of new or deeper knowledge that is relevant to the discipline. The authors conclude that disentangling concept analysis from techniques for concept advancement is critical to enhancing the utility of concept-based research in nursing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944452942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944452942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

SP - 197

EP - 208

JO - Research and theory for nursing practice

JF - Research and theory for nursing practice

SN - 1541-6577

IS - 2

ER -