Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems: Evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data

Robert B. Slaney, Aaron L. Pincus, Amanda A. Uliaszek, Kenneth T. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to identify three groups for both measures: adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists and nonperfectionists. Analyses of group profiles were performed on the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex (IIP-C) scales using the structural summary method for circumplex data. APS-R and DAPS groups were compared on interpersonal problems endorsement and IIP-C profile characteristics. For both measures, results supported the hypotheses that maladaptive perfectionists would exhibit elevated profiles reflecting hostile-dominant and friendly-submissive interpersonal problems, whereas the adaptive perfectionists would exhibit low profile elevation indicative of interpersonal adjustment. Overall, results supported Slaney and colleagues' (2001) model of perfectionism and provided evidence for the validity of the APS-R and DAPS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-153
Number of pages16
JournalAssessment
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Equipment and Supplies
Interpersonal Relations
Cluster Analysis
Perfectionism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{6132ef9777ee45ee9eb47a53bdcf7e6f,
title = "Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems: Evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data",
abstract = "This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to identify three groups for both measures: adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists and nonperfectionists. Analyses of group profiles were performed on the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex (IIP-C) scales using the structural summary method for circumplex data. APS-R and DAPS groups were compared on interpersonal problems endorsement and IIP-C profile characteristics. For both measures, results supported the hypotheses that maladaptive perfectionists would exhibit elevated profiles reflecting hostile-dominant and friendly-submissive interpersonal problems, whereas the adaptive perfectionists would exhibit low profile elevation indicative of interpersonal adjustment. Overall, results supported Slaney and colleagues' (2001) model of perfectionism and provided evidence for the validity of the APS-R and DAPS.",
author = "Slaney, {Robert B.} and Pincus, {Aaron L.} and Uliaszek, {Amanda A.} and Wang, {Kenneth T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191105284878",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "138--153",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems : Evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data. / Slaney, Robert B.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Uliaszek, Amanda A.; Wang, Kenneth T.

In: Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 138-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems

T2 - Evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data

AU - Slaney, Robert B.

AU - Pincus, Aaron L.

AU - Uliaszek, Amanda A.

AU - Wang, Kenneth T.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to identify three groups for both measures: adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists and nonperfectionists. Analyses of group profiles were performed on the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex (IIP-C) scales using the structural summary method for circumplex data. APS-R and DAPS groups were compared on interpersonal problems endorsement and IIP-C profile characteristics. For both measures, results supported the hypotheses that maladaptive perfectionists would exhibit elevated profiles reflecting hostile-dominant and friendly-submissive interpersonal problems, whereas the adaptive perfectionists would exhibit low profile elevation indicative of interpersonal adjustment. Overall, results supported Slaney and colleagues' (2001) model of perfectionism and provided evidence for the validity of the APS-R and DAPS.

AB - This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to identify three groups for both measures: adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists and nonperfectionists. Analyses of group profiles were performed on the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex (IIP-C) scales using the structural summary method for circumplex data. APS-R and DAPS groups were compared on interpersonal problems endorsement and IIP-C profile characteristics. For both measures, results supported the hypotheses that maladaptive perfectionists would exhibit elevated profiles reflecting hostile-dominant and friendly-submissive interpersonal problems, whereas the adaptive perfectionists would exhibit low profile elevation indicative of interpersonal adjustment. Overall, results supported Slaney and colleagues' (2001) model of perfectionism and provided evidence for the validity of the APS-R and DAPS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646524532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646524532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191105284878

DO - 10.1177/1073191105284878

M3 - Article

C2 - 16672729

AN - SCOPUS:33646524532

VL - 13

SP - 138

EP - 153

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 2

ER -