Conceptual and theoretical issues in the study of deviance

Robert M. Terry, Darrell J. Steffensmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The agenda for theorists of deviance remains as it has been for many years: Adequate conceptualization of the phenomenon in combination with theoretical attention to the problems of how deviance is produced (deviance‐making), how and why deviance occurs (theories of deviance) and how and why responses to deviance take particular forms (reactions to deviance). We argue that deviance is best conceptualized as differentially valuated phenomena. Deviance‐making is identified as an important, yet generally neglected area of concern. While we regard theorizing in deviance as relatively stagnant, some trends and issues are identified, with particular attention being given to the recent rise of structural and macro‐level theorizing. Reactions to deviance are discussed under the rubric of a series of generalizations subject to additional empirical assessment and synthesizing. We conclude by noting that attention to the issues identified in our agenda is imperative if the sociology of deviance is to remain a viable and distinct sub‐field within the discipline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-76
Number of pages22
JournalDeviant Behavior
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Sociology
deviant behavior
sociology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

@article{145e605facfc46be871b74ee74047b94,
title = "Conceptual and theoretical issues in the study of deviance",
abstract = "The agenda for theorists of deviance remains as it has been for many years: Adequate conceptualization of the phenomenon in combination with theoretical attention to the problems of how deviance is produced (deviance‐making), how and why deviance occurs (theories of deviance) and how and why responses to deviance take particular forms (reactions to deviance). We argue that deviance is best conceptualized as differentially valuated phenomena. Deviance‐making is identified as an important, yet generally neglected area of concern. While we regard theorizing in deviance as relatively stagnant, some trends and issues are identified, with particular attention being given to the recent rise of structural and macro‐level theorizing. Reactions to deviance are discussed under the rubric of a series of generalizations subject to additional empirical assessment and synthesizing. We conclude by noting that attention to the issues identified in our agenda is imperative if the sociology of deviance is to remain a viable and distinct sub‐field within the discipline.",
author = "Terry, {Robert M.} and Steffensmeier, {Darrell J.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01639625.1988.9967767",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "55--76",
journal = "Deviant Behavior",
issn = "0163-9625",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Conceptual and theoretical issues in the study of deviance. / Terry, Robert M.; Steffensmeier, Darrell J.

In: Deviant Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 55-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual and theoretical issues in the study of deviance

AU - Terry, Robert M.

AU - Steffensmeier, Darrell J.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The agenda for theorists of deviance remains as it has been for many years: Adequate conceptualization of the phenomenon in combination with theoretical attention to the problems of how deviance is produced (deviance‐making), how and why deviance occurs (theories of deviance) and how and why responses to deviance take particular forms (reactions to deviance). We argue that deviance is best conceptualized as differentially valuated phenomena. Deviance‐making is identified as an important, yet generally neglected area of concern. While we regard theorizing in deviance as relatively stagnant, some trends and issues are identified, with particular attention being given to the recent rise of structural and macro‐level theorizing. Reactions to deviance are discussed under the rubric of a series of generalizations subject to additional empirical assessment and synthesizing. We conclude by noting that attention to the issues identified in our agenda is imperative if the sociology of deviance is to remain a viable and distinct sub‐field within the discipline.

AB - The agenda for theorists of deviance remains as it has been for many years: Adequate conceptualization of the phenomenon in combination with theoretical attention to the problems of how deviance is produced (deviance‐making), how and why deviance occurs (theories of deviance) and how and why responses to deviance take particular forms (reactions to deviance). We argue that deviance is best conceptualized as differentially valuated phenomena. Deviance‐making is identified as an important, yet generally neglected area of concern. While we regard theorizing in deviance as relatively stagnant, some trends and issues are identified, with particular attention being given to the recent rise of structural and macro‐level theorizing. Reactions to deviance are discussed under the rubric of a series of generalizations subject to additional empirical assessment and synthesizing. We conclude by noting that attention to the issues identified in our agenda is imperative if the sociology of deviance is to remain a viable and distinct sub‐field within the discipline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928507004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928507004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01639625.1988.9967767

DO - 10.1080/01639625.1988.9967767

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 55

EP - 76

JO - Deviant Behavior

JF - Deviant Behavior

SN - 0163-9625

IS - 1

ER -