Konfigurale auswertung von daten aus pratest-posttest kontrollgruppen designs

Translated title of the contribution: Configural analysis of data from pretest-posttest control group designs

Mark Kurt Stemmler, F. Masendorf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

For treatment evaluation in multivariate pretest-posttest designs, methods of Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) are recommended. Specifically, three CFA methods are proposed: (1) Prediction CFA, (2) Interaction CFA, and (3) Generalized Unary Hypothesis Analysis (GUHA) CFA. These methods share in common that they define treatment response-relations via so-called types, that is local or regional associations among the factors of a treatment- response cross-classification. Unit of analysis for these CFA approaches are difference scores between the first and second observation. Numerical examples use data from an experiment on the effects of training methods on calculation and reasoning in learning disabled school children.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)267-276
Number of pages10
JournalZeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Volume46
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Control Groups
Disabled Children
Therapeutics
Observation
Learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

@article{193bf8c9ff6649978a3eca50b2ee6b4e,
title = "Konfigurale auswertung von daten aus pratest-posttest kontrollgruppen designs",
abstract = "For treatment evaluation in multivariate pretest-posttest designs, methods of Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) are recommended. Specifically, three CFA methods are proposed: (1) Prediction CFA, (2) Interaction CFA, and (3) Generalized Unary Hypothesis Analysis (GUHA) CFA. These methods share in common that they define treatment response-relations via so-called types, that is local or regional associations among the factors of a treatment- response cross-classification. Unit of analysis for these CFA approaches are difference scores between the first and second observation. Numerical examples use data from an experiment on the effects of training methods on calculation and reasoning in learning disabled school children.",
author = "Stemmler, {Mark Kurt} and F. Masendorf",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "German",
volume = "46",
pages = "267--276",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie",
issn = "1661-4747",
publisher = "Verlag Hans Huber",
number = "3",

}

Konfigurale auswertung von daten aus pratest-posttest kontrollgruppen designs. / Stemmler, Mark Kurt; Masendorf, F.

In: Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Vol. 46, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 267-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Konfigurale auswertung von daten aus pratest-posttest kontrollgruppen designs

AU - Stemmler, Mark Kurt

AU - Masendorf, F.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - For treatment evaluation in multivariate pretest-posttest designs, methods of Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) are recommended. Specifically, three CFA methods are proposed: (1) Prediction CFA, (2) Interaction CFA, and (3) Generalized Unary Hypothesis Analysis (GUHA) CFA. These methods share in common that they define treatment response-relations via so-called types, that is local or regional associations among the factors of a treatment- response cross-classification. Unit of analysis for these CFA approaches are difference scores between the first and second observation. Numerical examples use data from an experiment on the effects of training methods on calculation and reasoning in learning disabled school children.

AB - For treatment evaluation in multivariate pretest-posttest designs, methods of Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) are recommended. Specifically, three CFA methods are proposed: (1) Prediction CFA, (2) Interaction CFA, and (3) Generalized Unary Hypothesis Analysis (GUHA) CFA. These methods share in common that they define treatment response-relations via so-called types, that is local or regional associations among the factors of a treatment- response cross-classification. Unit of analysis for these CFA approaches are difference scores between the first and second observation. Numerical examples use data from an experiment on the effects of training methods on calculation and reasoning in learning disabled school children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031864108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031864108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031864108

VL - 46

SP - 267

EP - 276

JO - Zeitschrift fur Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie

JF - Zeitschrift fur Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie

SN - 1661-4747

IS - 3

ER -