Conscious Attention and Abstraction in Concept Learning

Richard Alan Carlson, Don E. Dulany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several authors have recently argued that learning may proceed unconsciously, (a) operating on information outside conscious attention or (b) producing unconscious abstractions guiding category judgment. To examine these hypotheses, we presented a complex, ill-defined category structure with diagnostic features either within or outside conscious attention and with three strategy instructions varying in their likelihood of inducing a search for conscious rules. On a subsequent transfer test, subjects reported rules guiding their classifications. Several measures showed that information outside conscious attention did not serve as data for concept learning. Conscious rules predicted accuracy of classification without significant error under all strategy instructions and were more strongly related to accuracy of classification than were alternative predictors of classification. These results indicate the success of a content criterion of consciousness: Hypotheses of unconscious learning are most strongly disconfirmed by evidence that the content of conscious awareness could, given reasonable process assumptions, account for the learning observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-58
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1985

Fingerprint

abstraction
Learning
learning
instruction
test subject
Consciousness
consciousness
diagnostic
Concept Learning
Conscious
evidence
Unconscious (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{6b3f688d87a14193a53f05f3f2e0aea0,
title = "Conscious Attention and Abstraction in Concept Learning",
abstract = "Several authors have recently argued that learning may proceed unconsciously, (a) operating on information outside conscious attention or (b) producing unconscious abstractions guiding category judgment. To examine these hypotheses, we presented a complex, ill-defined category structure with diagnostic features either within or outside conscious attention and with three strategy instructions varying in their likelihood of inducing a search for conscious rules. On a subsequent transfer test, subjects reported rules guiding their classifications. Several measures showed that information outside conscious attention did not serve as data for concept learning. Conscious rules predicted accuracy of classification without significant error under all strategy instructions and were more strongly related to accuracy of classification than were alternative predictors of classification. These results indicate the success of a content criterion of consciousness: Hypotheses of unconscious learning are most strongly disconfirmed by evidence that the content of conscious awareness could, given reasonable process assumptions, account for the learning observed.",
author = "Carlson, {Richard Alan} and Dulany, {Don E.}",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.45",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "45--58",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Conscious Attention and Abstraction in Concept Learning. / Carlson, Richard Alan; Dulany, Don E.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.1985, p. 45-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conscious Attention and Abstraction in Concept Learning

AU - Carlson, Richard Alan

AU - Dulany, Don E.

PY - 1985/1/1

Y1 - 1985/1/1

N2 - Several authors have recently argued that learning may proceed unconsciously, (a) operating on information outside conscious attention or (b) producing unconscious abstractions guiding category judgment. To examine these hypotheses, we presented a complex, ill-defined category structure with diagnostic features either within or outside conscious attention and with three strategy instructions varying in their likelihood of inducing a search for conscious rules. On a subsequent transfer test, subjects reported rules guiding their classifications. Several measures showed that information outside conscious attention did not serve as data for concept learning. Conscious rules predicted accuracy of classification without significant error under all strategy instructions and were more strongly related to accuracy of classification than were alternative predictors of classification. These results indicate the success of a content criterion of consciousness: Hypotheses of unconscious learning are most strongly disconfirmed by evidence that the content of conscious awareness could, given reasonable process assumptions, account for the learning observed.

AB - Several authors have recently argued that learning may proceed unconsciously, (a) operating on information outside conscious attention or (b) producing unconscious abstractions guiding category judgment. To examine these hypotheses, we presented a complex, ill-defined category structure with diagnostic features either within or outside conscious attention and with three strategy instructions varying in their likelihood of inducing a search for conscious rules. On a subsequent transfer test, subjects reported rules guiding their classifications. Several measures showed that information outside conscious attention did not serve as data for concept learning. Conscious rules predicted accuracy of classification without significant error under all strategy instructions and were more strongly related to accuracy of classification than were alternative predictors of classification. These results indicate the success of a content criterion of consciousness: Hypotheses of unconscious learning are most strongly disconfirmed by evidence that the content of conscious awareness could, given reasonable process assumptions, account for the learning observed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038140827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038140827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.45

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.45

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 45

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 1

ER -