Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes

Elizabeth Capezuti, Laura M. Wagner, Barbara L. Brush, Marie Boltz, Susan Renz, Karen A. Talerico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse (APN) intervention on restrictive side rail usage in four nursing homes and with a sample of 251 residents. A secondary question explored the association between restrictive side rail reduction and bed-related falls. DESIGN: Pre- and posttest design. SETTING: Four urban nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: All nursing home residents present in the nursing home at three time points (n=710, 719, and 707) and a subset of residents (n=251) with restrictive side rail use at baseline. INTERVENTION: APN consultation with individual residents and facility-wide education and consultation. MEASUREMENTS: Direct observation of side rail status, resident and nurse interview for functional status, mobility, cognition, behavioral symptoms, medical record review for demographics and treatment information, and incident reports for fall data. RESULTS: At the institutional level, one of the four nursing homes significantly reduced restrictive side rail use (P=.01). At the individual participant level, 51.4% (n=130) reduced restrictive side rail use. For the group that reduced restrictive side rails, there was a significantly (P<.001) reduced fall rate (-0.053; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.083 to -0.024), whereas the group that continued restrictive side rail did not demonstrate a significantly (P=.17) reduced fall rate (-0.013; 95% CI=-0.056-0.030). CONCLUSION: An APN consultation model can safely reduce side rail use. Restrictive side rail reduction does not lead to an increase in bed-related falls. Although side rails serve many purposes, routine use of these devices to restrict voluntary movement and prevent falls is not supported.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-341
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

Nursing Homes
Nurses
Referral and Consultation
Confidence Intervals
Behavioral Symptoms
Cognition
Medical Records
Observation
Demography
Interviews
Education
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Capezuti, Elizabeth ; Wagner, Laura M. ; Brush, Barbara L. ; Boltz, Marie ; Renz, Susan ; Talerico, Karen A. / Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 334-341.
@article{f09866c6f0864ba9a65fb45037b91012,
title = "Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse (APN) intervention on restrictive side rail usage in four nursing homes and with a sample of 251 residents. A secondary question explored the association between restrictive side rail reduction and bed-related falls. DESIGN: Pre- and posttest design. SETTING: Four urban nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: All nursing home residents present in the nursing home at three time points (n=710, 719, and 707) and a subset of residents (n=251) with restrictive side rail use at baseline. INTERVENTION: APN consultation with individual residents and facility-wide education and consultation. MEASUREMENTS: Direct observation of side rail status, resident and nurse interview for functional status, mobility, cognition, behavioral symptoms, medical record review for demographics and treatment information, and incident reports for fall data. RESULTS: At the institutional level, one of the four nursing homes significantly reduced restrictive side rail use (P=.01). At the individual participant level, 51.4{\%} (n=130) reduced restrictive side rail use. For the group that reduced restrictive side rails, there was a significantly (P<.001) reduced fall rate (-0.053; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI)=-0.083 to -0.024), whereas the group that continued restrictive side rail did not demonstrate a significantly (P=.17) reduced fall rate (-0.013; 95{\%} CI=-0.056-0.030). CONCLUSION: An APN consultation model can safely reduce side rail use. Restrictive side rail reduction does not lead to an increase in bed-related falls. Although side rails serve many purposes, routine use of these devices to restrict voluntary movement and prevent falls is not supported.",
author = "Elizabeth Capezuti and Wagner, {Laura M.} and Brush, {Barbara L.} and Marie Boltz and Susan Renz and Talerico, {Karen A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01082.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "334--341",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes. / Capezuti, Elizabeth; Wagner, Laura M.; Brush, Barbara L.; Boltz, Marie; Renz, Susan; Talerico, Karen A.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.03.2007, p. 334-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes

AU - Capezuti, Elizabeth

AU - Wagner, Laura M.

AU - Brush, Barbara L.

AU - Boltz, Marie

AU - Renz, Susan

AU - Talerico, Karen A.

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse (APN) intervention on restrictive side rail usage in four nursing homes and with a sample of 251 residents. A secondary question explored the association between restrictive side rail reduction and bed-related falls. DESIGN: Pre- and posttest design. SETTING: Four urban nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: All nursing home residents present in the nursing home at three time points (n=710, 719, and 707) and a subset of residents (n=251) with restrictive side rail use at baseline. INTERVENTION: APN consultation with individual residents and facility-wide education and consultation. MEASUREMENTS: Direct observation of side rail status, resident and nurse interview for functional status, mobility, cognition, behavioral symptoms, medical record review for demographics and treatment information, and incident reports for fall data. RESULTS: At the institutional level, one of the four nursing homes significantly reduced restrictive side rail use (P=.01). At the individual participant level, 51.4% (n=130) reduced restrictive side rail use. For the group that reduced restrictive side rails, there was a significantly (P<.001) reduced fall rate (-0.053; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.083 to -0.024), whereas the group that continued restrictive side rail did not demonstrate a significantly (P=.17) reduced fall rate (-0.013; 95% CI=-0.056-0.030). CONCLUSION: An APN consultation model can safely reduce side rail use. Restrictive side rail reduction does not lead to an increase in bed-related falls. Although side rails serve many purposes, routine use of these devices to restrict voluntary movement and prevent falls is not supported.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse (APN) intervention on restrictive side rail usage in four nursing homes and with a sample of 251 residents. A secondary question explored the association between restrictive side rail reduction and bed-related falls. DESIGN: Pre- and posttest design. SETTING: Four urban nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: All nursing home residents present in the nursing home at three time points (n=710, 719, and 707) and a subset of residents (n=251) with restrictive side rail use at baseline. INTERVENTION: APN consultation with individual residents and facility-wide education and consultation. MEASUREMENTS: Direct observation of side rail status, resident and nurse interview for functional status, mobility, cognition, behavioral symptoms, medical record review for demographics and treatment information, and incident reports for fall data. RESULTS: At the institutional level, one of the four nursing homes significantly reduced restrictive side rail use (P=.01). At the individual participant level, 51.4% (n=130) reduced restrictive side rail use. For the group that reduced restrictive side rails, there was a significantly (P<.001) reduced fall rate (-0.053; 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.083 to -0.024), whereas the group that continued restrictive side rail did not demonstrate a significantly (P=.17) reduced fall rate (-0.013; 95% CI=-0.056-0.030). CONCLUSION: An APN consultation model can safely reduce side rail use. Restrictive side rail reduction does not lead to an increase in bed-related falls. Although side rails serve many purposes, routine use of these devices to restrict voluntary movement and prevent falls is not supported.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847307661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847307661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01082.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01082.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17341234

AN - SCOPUS:33847307661

VL - 55

SP - 334

EP - 341

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 3

ER -