Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Private sector firms have dominated the research, development, and commercialization processes for transgenic crops. This has led to a narrow focus on a few commercially important crops and engineered traits, while minor crops and traits remain largely ignored. Analysts have decried this situation and called for more public-centered research regimes, such as research on minor crops and traits. Universities are often identified as places where research on the more minor crops and traits should occur. The burgeoning literature on the changing structure of the university toward an institution more aligned with private for-profit sector interests and orientations calls these arguments into question. Using time series data from 1993-2002 obtained from the US Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, we find that over time, university research on transgenic crops has increasingly mirrored the research profile of for-profit firms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-942
Number of pages14
JournalSocial studies of science
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

biotechnology
university
profit
firm
university research
commercialization
research and development
time series
private sector
animal
agriculture
regime
Conducting
Crops
Biotechnology
health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{4bacd93d60cd416ba13fff0e0246f198,
title = "Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies",
abstract = "Private sector firms have dominated the research, development, and commercialization processes for transgenic crops. This has led to a narrow focus on a few commercially important crops and engineered traits, while minor crops and traits remain largely ignored. Analysts have decried this situation and called for more public-centered research regimes, such as research on minor crops and traits. Universities are often identified as places where research on the more minor crops and traits should occur. The burgeoning literature on the changing structure of the university toward an institution more aligned with private for-profit sector interests and orientations calls these arguments into question. Using time series data from 1993-2002 obtained from the US Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, we find that over time, university research on transgenic crops has increasingly mirrored the research profile of for-profit firms.",
author = "Rick Welsh and Glenna, {Leland Luther}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0306312706060062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "929--942",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies. / Welsh, Rick; Glenna, Leland Luther.

In: Social studies of science, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 929-942.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies

AU - Welsh, Rick

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Private sector firms have dominated the research, development, and commercialization processes for transgenic crops. This has led to a narrow focus on a few commercially important crops and engineered traits, while minor crops and traits remain largely ignored. Analysts have decried this situation and called for more public-centered research regimes, such as research on minor crops and traits. Universities are often identified as places where research on the more minor crops and traits should occur. The burgeoning literature on the changing structure of the university toward an institution more aligned with private for-profit sector interests and orientations calls these arguments into question. Using time series data from 1993-2002 obtained from the US Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, we find that over time, university research on transgenic crops has increasingly mirrored the research profile of for-profit firms.

AB - Private sector firms have dominated the research, development, and commercialization processes for transgenic crops. This has led to a narrow focus on a few commercially important crops and engineered traits, while minor crops and traits remain largely ignored. Analysts have decried this situation and called for more public-centered research regimes, such as research on minor crops and traits. Universities are often identified as places where research on the more minor crops and traits should occur. The burgeoning literature on the changing structure of the university toward an institution more aligned with private for-profit sector interests and orientations calls these arguments into question. Using time series data from 1993-2002 obtained from the US Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, we find that over time, university research on transgenic crops has increasingly mirrored the research profile of for-profit firms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750743752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750743752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312706060062

DO - 10.1177/0306312706060062

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 929

EP - 942

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 6

ER -