Consilient spheres of influence in a land grant setting

Mark Edward Ballora, Curtis Craig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

At Penn State, music technology is something of a stranger in a strange land. As a programme, it began in the early twenty-first century, when the necessity of the moment was an anticipated revision to the guidelines from the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM), the North American accrediting body. Music schools were charged with ensuring that music majors were exposed to 'relevant technologies'. It was left largely to individual institutions to interpret what this meant. At Penn State, a course was created to address this guideline, and it generated interest among students. This course then spawned a series of related courses. These courses eventually created enough of a curricular presence to warrant creating an undergraduate minor. We now expect that the minor will spawn an undergraduate major. The music technology programme's locus lies not solely within the School of Music; rather, it overlaps as an interdisciplinary area with a variety of programmes throughout the university's offerings. These overlaps are a unique feature of the programme. It is an unusual arrangement, but it is a product of its time and place. Three populations of students have coalesced, and the pedagogical challenge has been to create a curriculum that can serve all of them. The programme might be thought of as series of concentric spheres; each is centred around the same general concept structure, but with expanding breadth for different levels of student involvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-206
Number of pages6
JournalOrganised Sound
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Students
Curricula
Land Grants
Music School
Overlap
Music Technology
Undergraduate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Music
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Ballora, Mark Edward ; Craig, Curtis. / Consilient spheres of influence in a land grant setting. In: Organised Sound. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 201-206.
@article{8d210119ac9644c9b958b586f0f94e76,
title = "Consilient spheres of influence in a land grant setting",
abstract = "At Penn State, music technology is something of a stranger in a strange land. As a programme, it began in the early twenty-first century, when the necessity of the moment was an anticipated revision to the guidelines from the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM), the North American accrediting body. Music schools were charged with ensuring that music majors were exposed to 'relevant technologies'. It was left largely to individual institutions to interpret what this meant. At Penn State, a course was created to address this guideline, and it generated interest among students. This course then spawned a series of related courses. These courses eventually created enough of a curricular presence to warrant creating an undergraduate minor. We now expect that the minor will spawn an undergraduate major. The music technology programme's locus lies not solely within the School of Music; rather, it overlaps as an interdisciplinary area with a variety of programmes throughout the university's offerings. These overlaps are a unique feature of the programme. It is an unusual arrangement, but it is a product of its time and place. Three populations of students have coalesced, and the pedagogical challenge has been to create a curriculum that can serve all of them. The programme might be thought of as series of concentric spheres; each is centred around the same general concept structure, but with expanding breadth for different levels of student involvement.",
author = "Ballora, {Mark Edward} and Curtis Craig",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1355771813000113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "201--206",
journal = "Organised Sound",
issn = "1355-7718",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Consilient spheres of influence in a land grant setting. / Ballora, Mark Edward; Craig, Curtis.

In: Organised Sound, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.08.2013, p. 201-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consilient spheres of influence in a land grant setting

AU - Ballora, Mark Edward

AU - Craig, Curtis

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - At Penn State, music technology is something of a stranger in a strange land. As a programme, it began in the early twenty-first century, when the necessity of the moment was an anticipated revision to the guidelines from the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM), the North American accrediting body. Music schools were charged with ensuring that music majors were exposed to 'relevant technologies'. It was left largely to individual institutions to interpret what this meant. At Penn State, a course was created to address this guideline, and it generated interest among students. This course then spawned a series of related courses. These courses eventually created enough of a curricular presence to warrant creating an undergraduate minor. We now expect that the minor will spawn an undergraduate major. The music technology programme's locus lies not solely within the School of Music; rather, it overlaps as an interdisciplinary area with a variety of programmes throughout the university's offerings. These overlaps are a unique feature of the programme. It is an unusual arrangement, but it is a product of its time and place. Three populations of students have coalesced, and the pedagogical challenge has been to create a curriculum that can serve all of them. The programme might be thought of as series of concentric spheres; each is centred around the same general concept structure, but with expanding breadth for different levels of student involvement.

AB - At Penn State, music technology is something of a stranger in a strange land. As a programme, it began in the early twenty-first century, when the necessity of the moment was an anticipated revision to the guidelines from the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM), the North American accrediting body. Music schools were charged with ensuring that music majors were exposed to 'relevant technologies'. It was left largely to individual institutions to interpret what this meant. At Penn State, a course was created to address this guideline, and it generated interest among students. This course then spawned a series of related courses. These courses eventually created enough of a curricular presence to warrant creating an undergraduate minor. We now expect that the minor will spawn an undergraduate major. The music technology programme's locus lies not solely within the School of Music; rather, it overlaps as an interdisciplinary area with a variety of programmes throughout the university's offerings. These overlaps are a unique feature of the programme. It is an unusual arrangement, but it is a product of its time and place. Three populations of students have coalesced, and the pedagogical challenge has been to create a curriculum that can serve all of them. The programme might be thought of as series of concentric spheres; each is centred around the same general concept structure, but with expanding breadth for different levels of student involvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880283660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880283660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355771813000113

DO - 10.1017/S1355771813000113

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880283660

VL - 18

SP - 201

EP - 206

JO - Organised Sound

JF - Organised Sound

SN - 1355-7718

IS - 2

ER -