Constraints on general slowing

A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients

Martin John Sliwinski, Charles B. Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

General slowing (GS) theories are often tested by meta-analyses that model mean latencies of older adults as a function of mean latencies of younger adults. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is inappropriate for this purpose because it fails to account for the nested structure of multitask response time (RT) data. Hierarchial linear models (HLM) are an alternative method for analyzing such data. OLS analysis of data from 21 studies that used iterative cognitive tasks supported GS; however, HLM analysis demonstrated significant variance in slowing across experimental tasks and a process-specific effect by showing less slowing for memory scanning than for visual-search and mental-rotation tasks. The authors conclude that HLM is more suitable than OLS methods for meta-analyses of RT data and for testing GS theories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-175
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology and Aging
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1998

Fingerprint

Least-Squares Analysis
Meta-Analysis
Linear Models
Reaction Time
Young Adult

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{8f026c82fea7498691568d95b335518b,
title = "Constraints on general slowing: A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients",
abstract = "General slowing (GS) theories are often tested by meta-analyses that model mean latencies of older adults as a function of mean latencies of younger adults. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is inappropriate for this purpose because it fails to account for the nested structure of multitask response time (RT) data. Hierarchial linear models (HLM) are an alternative method for analyzing such data. OLS analysis of data from 21 studies that used iterative cognitive tasks supported GS; however, HLM analysis demonstrated significant variance in slowing across experimental tasks and a process-specific effect by showing less slowing for memory scanning than for visual-search and mental-rotation tasks. The authors conclude that HLM is more suitable than OLS methods for meta-analyses of RT data and for testing GS theories.",
author = "Sliwinski, {Martin John} and Hall, {Charles B.}",
year = "1998",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "164--175",
journal = "Psychology and Aging",
issn = "0882-7974",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Constraints on general slowing : A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients. / Sliwinski, Martin John; Hall, Charles B.

In: Psychology and Aging, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.05.1998, p. 164-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraints on general slowing

T2 - A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients

AU - Sliwinski, Martin John

AU - Hall, Charles B.

PY - 1998/5/1

Y1 - 1998/5/1

N2 - General slowing (GS) theories are often tested by meta-analyses that model mean latencies of older adults as a function of mean latencies of younger adults. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is inappropriate for this purpose because it fails to account for the nested structure of multitask response time (RT) data. Hierarchial linear models (HLM) are an alternative method for analyzing such data. OLS analysis of data from 21 studies that used iterative cognitive tasks supported GS; however, HLM analysis demonstrated significant variance in slowing across experimental tasks and a process-specific effect by showing less slowing for memory scanning than for visual-search and mental-rotation tasks. The authors conclude that HLM is more suitable than OLS methods for meta-analyses of RT data and for testing GS theories.

AB - General slowing (GS) theories are often tested by meta-analyses that model mean latencies of older adults as a function of mean latencies of younger adults. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is inappropriate for this purpose because it fails to account for the nested structure of multitask response time (RT) data. Hierarchial linear models (HLM) are an alternative method for analyzing such data. OLS analysis of data from 21 studies that used iterative cognitive tasks supported GS; however, HLM analysis demonstrated significant variance in slowing across experimental tasks and a process-specific effect by showing less slowing for memory scanning than for visual-search and mental-rotation tasks. The authors conclude that HLM is more suitable than OLS methods for meta-analyses of RT data and for testing GS theories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031976566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031976566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.164

DO - 10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.164

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 164

EP - 175

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

SN - 0882-7974

IS - 1

ER -