Constructing Justice: The Selective Use of Scripture in Formulating Early Jewish Accounts of the Courts

David C. Flatto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Elaborate depictions of the court system in Second Temple and rabbinic literature signify its centrality for the Jewish legal tradition. Rather than offering positivistic descriptions, these representations are better thought of as templates of how to organize justice. While historically less informative, they are vivid expressions of the early Jewish legal imagination and its fascinating fixation on the architecture of justice. A measure of the ahistoric quality of early accounts of judicial administration is their considerable exegetical strata. This article surveys how four seminal Second Temple and rabbinic works constructed accounts of the judiciary on the foundation of Scripture. The variances among them unfold from decisive hermeneutical choices, beginning with the threshold question of which among several, internally inconsistent, biblical sources to select as a base text. What animates these various choices, in turn, are competing conceptions of the origin and nature of legal authority within a religious tradition that enshrines the role of law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-515
Number of pages28
JournalHarvard Theological Review
Volume111
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Justice
Scripture
Second Temple
Rabbinic
Fixation
Centrality
Religious Traditions
Rabbinic Literature
Biblical Sources
Template
Judiciary
Authority
Conception

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{435f20d90ebc423287af1849aae754dd,
title = "Constructing Justice: The Selective Use of Scripture in Formulating Early Jewish Accounts of the Courts",
abstract = "Elaborate depictions of the court system in Second Temple and rabbinic literature signify its centrality for the Jewish legal tradition. Rather than offering positivistic descriptions, these representations are better thought of as templates of how to organize justice. While historically less informative, they are vivid expressions of the early Jewish legal imagination and its fascinating fixation on the architecture of justice. A measure of the ahistoric quality of early accounts of judicial administration is their considerable exegetical strata. This article surveys how four seminal Second Temple and rabbinic works constructed accounts of the judiciary on the foundation of Scripture. The variances among them unfold from decisive hermeneutical choices, beginning with the threshold question of which among several, internally inconsistent, biblical sources to select as a base text. What animates these various choices, in turn, are competing conceptions of the origin and nature of legal authority within a religious tradition that enshrines the role of law.",
author = "Flatto, {David C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S001781601800024X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "488--515",
journal = "Harvard Theological Review",
issn = "0017-8160",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Constructing Justice : The Selective Use of Scripture in Formulating Early Jewish Accounts of the Courts. / Flatto, David C.

In: Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 111, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 488-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Justice

T2 - The Selective Use of Scripture in Formulating Early Jewish Accounts of the Courts

AU - Flatto, David C.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Elaborate depictions of the court system in Second Temple and rabbinic literature signify its centrality for the Jewish legal tradition. Rather than offering positivistic descriptions, these representations are better thought of as templates of how to organize justice. While historically less informative, they are vivid expressions of the early Jewish legal imagination and its fascinating fixation on the architecture of justice. A measure of the ahistoric quality of early accounts of judicial administration is their considerable exegetical strata. This article surveys how four seminal Second Temple and rabbinic works constructed accounts of the judiciary on the foundation of Scripture. The variances among them unfold from decisive hermeneutical choices, beginning with the threshold question of which among several, internally inconsistent, biblical sources to select as a base text. What animates these various choices, in turn, are competing conceptions of the origin and nature of legal authority within a religious tradition that enshrines the role of law.

AB - Elaborate depictions of the court system in Second Temple and rabbinic literature signify its centrality for the Jewish legal tradition. Rather than offering positivistic descriptions, these representations are better thought of as templates of how to organize justice. While historically less informative, they are vivid expressions of the early Jewish legal imagination and its fascinating fixation on the architecture of justice. A measure of the ahistoric quality of early accounts of judicial administration is their considerable exegetical strata. This article surveys how four seminal Second Temple and rabbinic works constructed accounts of the judiciary on the foundation of Scripture. The variances among them unfold from decisive hermeneutical choices, beginning with the threshold question of which among several, internally inconsistent, biblical sources to select as a base text. What animates these various choices, in turn, are competing conceptions of the origin and nature of legal authority within a religious tradition that enshrines the role of law.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059667063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059667063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S001781601800024X

DO - 10.1017/S001781601800024X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059667063

VL - 111

SP - 488

EP - 515

JO - Harvard Theological Review

JF - Harvard Theological Review

SN - 0017-8160

IS - 4

ER -