Consumer substitution decisions: An integrative framework

Rebecca W. Hamilton, Debora V. Thompson, Zachary G. Arens, Simon J. Blanchard, Gerald Häubl, P. K. Kannan, Uzma Khan, Donald R. Lehmann, Margaret G. Meloy, Neal J. Roese, Manoj Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Substitution decisions have been examined from a variety of perspectives. The economics literature measures cross-price elasticity, operations research models optimal assortments, the psychology literature studies goals in conflict, and marketing research has examined substitution-in-use, brand switching, stockouts, and self-control. We integrate these perspectives into a common framework for understanding consumer substitution decisions; their specific drivers (availability of new alternatives, internal vs. external restrictions on choice); the moderating role of a consumer's commitment to an initially desired alternative; and the affective, motivational, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes of substitution. We use this framework to recommend new avenues for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-317
Number of pages13
JournalMarketing Letters
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

Hamilton, R. W., Thompson, D. V., Arens, Z. G., Blanchard, S. J., Häubl, G., Kannan, P. K., Khan, U., Lehmann, D. R., Meloy, M. G., Roese, N. J., & Thomas, M. (2014). Consumer substitution decisions: An integrative framework. Marketing Letters, 25(3), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9313-2