Contesting slavery: The politics of bondage and freedom in the new American nation

John Craig Hammond, Matthew Mason

Research output: Book/ReportBook

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent scholarship on slavery and politics between 1776 and 1840 has wholly revised historians' understanding of the problem of slavery in American politics. Contesting Slavery builds on the best of that literature to reexamine the politics of slavery in revolutionary America and the early republic. The original essays collected here analyze the Revolutionary era and the early republic on their own terms to produce fresh insights into the politics of slavery before 1840. The collection forces historians to rethink the multiple meanings of slavery and antislavery to a broad array of Americans, from free and enslaved African Americans to proslavery ideologues, from northern farmers to northern female reformers, from minor party functionaries to political luminaries such as Henry Clay. The essays also delineate the multiple ways slavery sustained conflict and consensus in local, regional, and national politics. In the end, Contesting Slavery both establishes the abiding presence of slavery and sectionalism in American political life and challenges historians' long-standing assumptions about the place, meaning, and significance of slavery in American politics between the Revolutionary and antebellum eras. Contributors: Rachel Hope Cleves, University of Victoria. David F. Ericson, George Mason University. John Craig Hammond, Penn State University, New Kensington. Matthew Mason, Brigham Young University. Richard Newman, Rochester Institute of Technology. James Oakes, CUNY Graduate Center. Peter S. Onuf, University of Virginia. Robert G. Parkinson, Shepherd University. Donald J. Ratcliffe, University of Oxford. Padraig Riley, Dalhousie University. Edward B. Rugemer, Yale University. Brian Schoen, Ohio University. Andrew Shankman, Rutgers University, Camden. George William Van Cleve, University of Virginia. Eva Sheppard Wolf, San Francisco State University.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherUniversity of Virginia Press
Number of pages313
ISBN (Electronic)9780813931173
ISBN (Print)9780813931050
StatePublished - Jun 10 2011

Fingerprint

Slavery
Bondage
Historian
Revolution
American Politics
Farmers
Camden
African Americans
Rochester
Political Life
Kensington
Ideologues
Anti-slavery
Reformer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

@book{e4220dce687147e6803d4705fd13f98d,
title = "Contesting slavery: The politics of bondage and freedom in the new American nation",
abstract = "Recent scholarship on slavery and politics between 1776 and 1840 has wholly revised historians' understanding of the problem of slavery in American politics. Contesting Slavery builds on the best of that literature to reexamine the politics of slavery in revolutionary America and the early republic. The original essays collected here analyze the Revolutionary era and the early republic on their own terms to produce fresh insights into the politics of slavery before 1840. The collection forces historians to rethink the multiple meanings of slavery and antislavery to a broad array of Americans, from free and enslaved African Americans to proslavery ideologues, from northern farmers to northern female reformers, from minor party functionaries to political luminaries such as Henry Clay. The essays also delineate the multiple ways slavery sustained conflict and consensus in local, regional, and national politics. In the end, Contesting Slavery both establishes the abiding presence of slavery and sectionalism in American political life and challenges historians' long-standing assumptions about the place, meaning, and significance of slavery in American politics between the Revolutionary and antebellum eras. Contributors: Rachel Hope Cleves, University of Victoria. David F. Ericson, George Mason University. John Craig Hammond, Penn State University, New Kensington. Matthew Mason, Brigham Young University. Richard Newman, Rochester Institute of Technology. James Oakes, CUNY Graduate Center. Peter S. Onuf, University of Virginia. Robert G. Parkinson, Shepherd University. Donald J. Ratcliffe, University of Oxford. Padraig Riley, Dalhousie University. Edward B. Rugemer, Yale University. Brian Schoen, Ohio University. Andrew Shankman, Rutgers University, Camden. George William Van Cleve, University of Virginia. Eva Sheppard Wolf, San Francisco State University.",
author = "Hammond, {John Craig} and Matthew Mason",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "10",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780813931050",
publisher = "University of Virginia Press",

}

Contesting slavery : The politics of bondage and freedom in the new American nation. / Hammond, John Craig; Mason, Matthew.

University of Virginia Press, 2011. 313 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

TY - BOOK

T1 - Contesting slavery

T2 - The politics of bondage and freedom in the new American nation

AU - Hammond, John Craig

AU - Mason, Matthew

PY - 2011/6/10

Y1 - 2011/6/10

N2 - Recent scholarship on slavery and politics between 1776 and 1840 has wholly revised historians' understanding of the problem of slavery in American politics. Contesting Slavery builds on the best of that literature to reexamine the politics of slavery in revolutionary America and the early republic. The original essays collected here analyze the Revolutionary era and the early republic on their own terms to produce fresh insights into the politics of slavery before 1840. The collection forces historians to rethink the multiple meanings of slavery and antislavery to a broad array of Americans, from free and enslaved African Americans to proslavery ideologues, from northern farmers to northern female reformers, from minor party functionaries to political luminaries such as Henry Clay. The essays also delineate the multiple ways slavery sustained conflict and consensus in local, regional, and national politics. In the end, Contesting Slavery both establishes the abiding presence of slavery and sectionalism in American political life and challenges historians' long-standing assumptions about the place, meaning, and significance of slavery in American politics between the Revolutionary and antebellum eras. Contributors: Rachel Hope Cleves, University of Victoria. David F. Ericson, George Mason University. John Craig Hammond, Penn State University, New Kensington. Matthew Mason, Brigham Young University. Richard Newman, Rochester Institute of Technology. James Oakes, CUNY Graduate Center. Peter S. Onuf, University of Virginia. Robert G. Parkinson, Shepherd University. Donald J. Ratcliffe, University of Oxford. Padraig Riley, Dalhousie University. Edward B. Rugemer, Yale University. Brian Schoen, Ohio University. Andrew Shankman, Rutgers University, Camden. George William Van Cleve, University of Virginia. Eva Sheppard Wolf, San Francisco State University.

AB - Recent scholarship on slavery and politics between 1776 and 1840 has wholly revised historians' understanding of the problem of slavery in American politics. Contesting Slavery builds on the best of that literature to reexamine the politics of slavery in revolutionary America and the early republic. The original essays collected here analyze the Revolutionary era and the early republic on their own terms to produce fresh insights into the politics of slavery before 1840. The collection forces historians to rethink the multiple meanings of slavery and antislavery to a broad array of Americans, from free and enslaved African Americans to proslavery ideologues, from northern farmers to northern female reformers, from minor party functionaries to political luminaries such as Henry Clay. The essays also delineate the multiple ways slavery sustained conflict and consensus in local, regional, and national politics. In the end, Contesting Slavery both establishes the abiding presence of slavery and sectionalism in American political life and challenges historians' long-standing assumptions about the place, meaning, and significance of slavery in American politics between the Revolutionary and antebellum eras. Contributors: Rachel Hope Cleves, University of Victoria. David F. Ericson, George Mason University. John Craig Hammond, Penn State University, New Kensington. Matthew Mason, Brigham Young University. Richard Newman, Rochester Institute of Technology. James Oakes, CUNY Graduate Center. Peter S. Onuf, University of Virginia. Robert G. Parkinson, Shepherd University. Donald J. Ratcliffe, University of Oxford. Padraig Riley, Dalhousie University. Edward B. Rugemer, Yale University. Brian Schoen, Ohio University. Andrew Shankman, Rutgers University, Camden. George William Van Cleve, University of Virginia. Eva Sheppard Wolf, San Francisco State University.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928177610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928177610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:84928177610

SN - 9780813931050

BT - Contesting slavery

PB - University of Virginia Press

ER -