Contradictory evidence and the exemplary scholar: The lives of Sahnun B. Sa id (D. 854)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When writing biographies of historical figures, narrative convention requires that concision and clarity be wrested from sources that are multiple and often confusing. In this article, I argue that multiple accounts of a person's life may be more than an accident arising from the way that information was compiled. Rather, such multiplicity renders exemplary figures adaptable to a wide variety of circumstances, making them even more useful as a focus of devotion and emulation. Examining multiple accounts of early Maliki scholar Sahnun b. Sa id (d. 854), including those of his travels in search of knowledge and of his suffering under the mihna (trial) in Kairouan, I find that close attention to apparently contradictory evidence may not get us any closer to understanding the man himself, but it does offer us much information about the ways in which he was considered an exemplary individual.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-132
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Middle East Studies
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

accident
evidence
travel
narrative
human being
Contradictory
Accidents
Devotion
Person
Maliki
Multiplicity
Clarity
Render
Historical Figures
trial
convention

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{b4a90c883fb64a10aeba1c807c15e082,
title = "Contradictory evidence and the exemplary scholar: The lives of Sahnun B. Sa id (D. 854)",
abstract = "When writing biographies of historical figures, narrative convention requires that concision and clarity be wrested from sources that are multiple and often confusing. In this article, I argue that multiple accounts of a person's life may be more than an accident arising from the way that information was compiled. Rather, such multiplicity renders exemplary figures adaptable to a wide variety of circumstances, making them even more useful as a focus of devotion and emulation. Examining multiple accounts of early Maliki scholar Sahnun b. Sa id (d. 854), including those of his travels in search of knowledge and of his suffering under the mihna (trial) in Kairouan, I find that close attention to apparently contradictory evidence may not get us any closer to understanding the man himself, but it does offer us much information about the ways in which he was considered an exemplary individual.",
author = "Brockopp, {Jonathan Eugene}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0020743810001224",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "115--132",
journal = "International Journal of Middle East Studies",
issn = "0020-7438",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contradictory evidence and the exemplary scholar

T2 - The lives of Sahnun B. Sa id (D. 854)

AU - Brockopp, Jonathan Eugene

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - When writing biographies of historical figures, narrative convention requires that concision and clarity be wrested from sources that are multiple and often confusing. In this article, I argue that multiple accounts of a person's life may be more than an accident arising from the way that information was compiled. Rather, such multiplicity renders exemplary figures adaptable to a wide variety of circumstances, making them even more useful as a focus of devotion and emulation. Examining multiple accounts of early Maliki scholar Sahnun b. Sa id (d. 854), including those of his travels in search of knowledge and of his suffering under the mihna (trial) in Kairouan, I find that close attention to apparently contradictory evidence may not get us any closer to understanding the man himself, but it does offer us much information about the ways in which he was considered an exemplary individual.

AB - When writing biographies of historical figures, narrative convention requires that concision and clarity be wrested from sources that are multiple and often confusing. In this article, I argue that multiple accounts of a person's life may be more than an accident arising from the way that information was compiled. Rather, such multiplicity renders exemplary figures adaptable to a wide variety of circumstances, making them even more useful as a focus of devotion and emulation. Examining multiple accounts of early Maliki scholar Sahnun b. Sa id (d. 854), including those of his travels in search of knowledge and of his suffering under the mihna (trial) in Kairouan, I find that close attention to apparently contradictory evidence may not get us any closer to understanding the man himself, but it does offer us much information about the ways in which he was considered an exemplary individual.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960387189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960387189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0020743810001224

DO - 10.1017/S0020743810001224

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960387189

VL - 43

SP - 115

EP - 132

JO - International Journal of Middle East Studies

JF - International Journal of Middle East Studies

SN - 0020-7438

IS - 1

ER -