Control diversity: How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age

Johanna Drewelies, Rachel E. Koffer, Nilam Ram, David Almeida, Denis Gerstorf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Domain-specific control beliefs typically buffer the influence stressors have on people's negative affect (affective stressor reactivity). However, little is known about the extent to which individuals' control beliefs vary across stressor types and whether such stressor-related control diversity is adaptive for affective well-being. We thus introduce a control diversity construct (a person-level summary of across-domain control beliefs) and examine how control diversity differs with age and relates to negative affect and affective stressor reactivity. We apply a multilevel model to daily diary data from the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE; N=2,022; mean age=56 years; 33-84; 57% women). Our findings indicate that above and beyond average control beliefs, people whose control is spread over fewer stressor domains (less control diversity) have lower negative affect and less affective stressor reactivity. Older adults are more likely than younger adults to have their control beliefs concentrated in one domain. Additionally, associations between control diversity and negative affect and affective stressor reactivity were age invariant. Moderation effects indicated that when people with low average control beliefs are faced with stressors, having control beliefs focused on fewer domains rather than spread broadly across many domains is associated with less negative affect. Our findings suggest that control diversity provides unique insights into how control beliefs differ across adulthood and contribute to affective well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-639
Number of pages15
JournalPsychology and aging
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Buffers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{6e58e2a56ee946458e7b798602859b7b,
title = "Control diversity: How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age",
abstract = "Domain-specific control beliefs typically buffer the influence stressors have on people's negative affect (affective stressor reactivity). However, little is known about the extent to which individuals' control beliefs vary across stressor types and whether such stressor-related control diversity is adaptive for affective well-being. We thus introduce a control diversity construct (a person-level summary of across-domain control beliefs) and examine how control diversity differs with age and relates to negative affect and affective stressor reactivity. We apply a multilevel model to daily diary data from the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE; N=2,022; mean age=56 years; 33-84; 57{\%} women). Our findings indicate that above and beyond average control beliefs, people whose control is spread over fewer stressor domains (less control diversity) have lower negative affect and less affective stressor reactivity. Older adults are more likely than younger adults to have their control beliefs concentrated in one domain. Additionally, associations between control diversity and negative affect and affective stressor reactivity were age invariant. Moderation effects indicated that when people with low average control beliefs are faced with stressors, having control beliefs focused on fewer domains rather than spread broadly across many domains is associated with less negative affect. Our findings suggest that control diversity provides unique insights into how control beliefs differ across adulthood and contribute to affective well-being.",
author = "Johanna Drewelies and Koffer, {Rachel E.} and Nilam Ram and David Almeida and Denis Gerstorf",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pag0000366",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "625--639",
journal = "Psychology and Aging",
issn = "0882-7974",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Control diversity : How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age. / Drewelies, Johanna; Koffer, Rachel E.; Ram, Nilam; Almeida, David; Gerstorf, Denis.

In: Psychology and aging, Vol. 34, No. 5, 01.08.2019, p. 625-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Control diversity

T2 - How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age

AU - Drewelies, Johanna

AU - Koffer, Rachel E.

AU - Ram, Nilam

AU - Almeida, David

AU - Gerstorf, Denis

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Domain-specific control beliefs typically buffer the influence stressors have on people's negative affect (affective stressor reactivity). However, little is known about the extent to which individuals' control beliefs vary across stressor types and whether such stressor-related control diversity is adaptive for affective well-being. We thus introduce a control diversity construct (a person-level summary of across-domain control beliefs) and examine how control diversity differs with age and relates to negative affect and affective stressor reactivity. We apply a multilevel model to daily diary data from the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE; N=2,022; mean age=56 years; 33-84; 57% women). Our findings indicate that above and beyond average control beliefs, people whose control is spread over fewer stressor domains (less control diversity) have lower negative affect and less affective stressor reactivity. Older adults are more likely than younger adults to have their control beliefs concentrated in one domain. Additionally, associations between control diversity and negative affect and affective stressor reactivity were age invariant. Moderation effects indicated that when people with low average control beliefs are faced with stressors, having control beliefs focused on fewer domains rather than spread broadly across many domains is associated with less negative affect. Our findings suggest that control diversity provides unique insights into how control beliefs differ across adulthood and contribute to affective well-being.

AB - Domain-specific control beliefs typically buffer the influence stressors have on people's negative affect (affective stressor reactivity). However, little is known about the extent to which individuals' control beliefs vary across stressor types and whether such stressor-related control diversity is adaptive for affective well-being. We thus introduce a control diversity construct (a person-level summary of across-domain control beliefs) and examine how control diversity differs with age and relates to negative affect and affective stressor reactivity. We apply a multilevel model to daily diary data from the National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE; N=2,022; mean age=56 years; 33-84; 57% women). Our findings indicate that above and beyond average control beliefs, people whose control is spread over fewer stressor domains (less control diversity) have lower negative affect and less affective stressor reactivity. Older adults are more likely than younger adults to have their control beliefs concentrated in one domain. Additionally, associations between control diversity and negative affect and affective stressor reactivity were age invariant. Moderation effects indicated that when people with low average control beliefs are faced with stressors, having control beliefs focused on fewer domains rather than spread broadly across many domains is associated with less negative affect. Our findings suggest that control diversity provides unique insights into how control beliefs differ across adulthood and contribute to affective well-being.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067583032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067583032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pag0000366

DO - 10.1037/pag0000366

M3 - Article

C2 - 31192626

AN - SCOPUS:85067583032

VL - 34

SP - 625

EP - 639

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

SN - 0882-7974

IS - 5

ER -