Convergence and divergence in empirical analyses of fiscal politics

William D. Berry, David Lynn Lowery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, a number of subliteratures on fiscal politics have converged toward a core set of hypothesized explanatory variables—representing political, economic, and social conditions—and a common modeling strategy patterned after that of Davis, Dempster, and Wildavsky (1974). But rather than indicating an emerging consensus among the subliteratures about the nature of the budgetary process, the convergence masks substantial divergence over critical assumptions about the nature of decision making. In this article we describe the development of this divergence in assumptions in an effort to evaluate its impact on empirical modeling exercises. We conclude with some prescriptions for defining the research agenda for the budgeting literature through the 1990s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-475
Number of pages30
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

divergence
politics
medication
decision making
economics
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Berry, William D. ; Lowery, David Lynn. / Convergence and divergence in empirical analyses of fiscal politics. In: American Politics Research. 1989 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 446-475.
@article{613d63a0e5b94cd08e4b07712045aa0d,
title = "Convergence and divergence in empirical analyses of fiscal politics",
abstract = "In recent years, a number of subliteratures on fiscal politics have converged toward a core set of hypothesized explanatory variables—representing political, economic, and social conditions—and a common modeling strategy patterned after that of Davis, Dempster, and Wildavsky (1974). But rather than indicating an emerging consensus among the subliteratures about the nature of the budgetary process, the convergence masks substantial divergence over critical assumptions about the nature of decision making. In this article we describe the development of this divergence in assumptions in an effort to evaluate its impact on empirical modeling exercises. We conclude with some prescriptions for defining the research agenda for the budgeting literature through the 1990s.",
author = "Berry, {William D.} and Lowery, {David Lynn}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/004478089017004007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "446--475",
journal = "American Politics Research",
issn = "1532-673X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Convergence and divergence in empirical analyses of fiscal politics. / Berry, William D.; Lowery, David Lynn.

In: American Politics Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.01.1989, p. 446-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convergence and divergence in empirical analyses of fiscal politics

AU - Berry, William D.

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - In recent years, a number of subliteratures on fiscal politics have converged toward a core set of hypothesized explanatory variables—representing political, economic, and social conditions—and a common modeling strategy patterned after that of Davis, Dempster, and Wildavsky (1974). But rather than indicating an emerging consensus among the subliteratures about the nature of the budgetary process, the convergence masks substantial divergence over critical assumptions about the nature of decision making. In this article we describe the development of this divergence in assumptions in an effort to evaluate its impact on empirical modeling exercises. We conclude with some prescriptions for defining the research agenda for the budgeting literature through the 1990s.

AB - In recent years, a number of subliteratures on fiscal politics have converged toward a core set of hypothesized explanatory variables—representing political, economic, and social conditions—and a common modeling strategy patterned after that of Davis, Dempster, and Wildavsky (1974). But rather than indicating an emerging consensus among the subliteratures about the nature of the budgetary process, the convergence masks substantial divergence over critical assumptions about the nature of decision making. In this article we describe the development of this divergence in assumptions in an effort to evaluate its impact on empirical modeling exercises. We conclude with some prescriptions for defining the research agenda for the budgeting literature through the 1990s.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965668679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965668679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/004478089017004007

DO - 10.1177/004478089017004007

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 446

EP - 475

JO - American Politics Research

JF - American Politics Research

SN - 1532-673X

IS - 4

ER -