Convergence of lingual and palatal gustatory neural activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract

Susan P. Travers, Carl Pfaffmann, Ralph Norgren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

128 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The responses of 54 neurons to independent sapid stimulation of 4 taste receptor subpopulations associated with: (1) anterior tongue; (2) nasoincisor ducts; (3) soft palate; and (4) foliate papillae were recorded from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) of the rat. Neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the anterior oral cavity (anterior tongue or nasoincisor ducts) were located more rostrally in the NST than neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the posterior oral cavity (soft palate or foliate papillae). Half of the sampled neurons responded exclusively to stimulation of one receptor subpopulation with the remaining neurons responsive to stimulation of two or more receptor subpopulations. The most common pattern of convergence observed was between responses arising from stimulation of the taste buds on the anterior tongue and those associated with the nasoincisor ducts of the hard palate. The sensitivity of NST neurons to anterior tongue and nasoincisor duct stimulation with the 4 standard taste stimuli was determined. When stimulating the anterior tongue, the order of effectiveness was NaCl > HCl > sucrose > quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). When the nasoincisor ducts were tested, however, the order of stimulus effectiveness was strikingly different: sucrose was the best stimulus, followed by HCl, NaCl, and QHCl. If both the anterior tongue and nasoincisor ducts are included, stimulation of taste receptors in the anterior oral cavity of the rat produces good responses to stimuli representing 3 of the 4 classical taste qualities: sweet, salty, and sour.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-320
Number of pages16
JournalBrain research
Volume365
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 19 1986

Fingerprint

Solitary Nucleus
Tongue
Neurons
Mouth
Soft Palate
Quinine
Sucrose
Taste Buds
Hard Palate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{db68bff2ae844e2ab9e527cc1d321ed4,
title = "Convergence of lingual and palatal gustatory neural activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract",
abstract = "The responses of 54 neurons to independent sapid stimulation of 4 taste receptor subpopulations associated with: (1) anterior tongue; (2) nasoincisor ducts; (3) soft palate; and (4) foliate papillae were recorded from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) of the rat. Neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the anterior oral cavity (anterior tongue or nasoincisor ducts) were located more rostrally in the NST than neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the posterior oral cavity (soft palate or foliate papillae). Half of the sampled neurons responded exclusively to stimulation of one receptor subpopulation with the remaining neurons responsive to stimulation of two or more receptor subpopulations. The most common pattern of convergence observed was between responses arising from stimulation of the taste buds on the anterior tongue and those associated with the nasoincisor ducts of the hard palate. The sensitivity of NST neurons to anterior tongue and nasoincisor duct stimulation with the 4 standard taste stimuli was determined. When stimulating the anterior tongue, the order of effectiveness was NaCl > HCl > sucrose > quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). When the nasoincisor ducts were tested, however, the order of stimulus effectiveness was strikingly different: sucrose was the best stimulus, followed by HCl, NaCl, and QHCl. If both the anterior tongue and nasoincisor ducts are included, stimulation of taste receptors in the anterior oral cavity of the rat produces good responses to stimuli representing 3 of the 4 classical taste qualities: sweet, salty, and sour.",
author = "Travers, {Susan P.} and Carl Pfaffmann and Ralph Norgren",
year = "1986",
month = "2",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/0006-8993(86)91642-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "365",
pages = "305--320",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Convergence of lingual and palatal gustatory neural activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract. / Travers, Susan P.; Pfaffmann, Carl; Norgren, Ralph.

In: Brain research, Vol. 365, No. 2, 19.02.1986, p. 305-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convergence of lingual and palatal gustatory neural activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract

AU - Travers, Susan P.

AU - Pfaffmann, Carl

AU - Norgren, Ralph

PY - 1986/2/19

Y1 - 1986/2/19

N2 - The responses of 54 neurons to independent sapid stimulation of 4 taste receptor subpopulations associated with: (1) anterior tongue; (2) nasoincisor ducts; (3) soft palate; and (4) foliate papillae were recorded from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) of the rat. Neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the anterior oral cavity (anterior tongue or nasoincisor ducts) were located more rostrally in the NST than neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the posterior oral cavity (soft palate or foliate papillae). Half of the sampled neurons responded exclusively to stimulation of one receptor subpopulation with the remaining neurons responsive to stimulation of two or more receptor subpopulations. The most common pattern of convergence observed was between responses arising from stimulation of the taste buds on the anterior tongue and those associated with the nasoincisor ducts of the hard palate. The sensitivity of NST neurons to anterior tongue and nasoincisor duct stimulation with the 4 standard taste stimuli was determined. When stimulating the anterior tongue, the order of effectiveness was NaCl > HCl > sucrose > quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). When the nasoincisor ducts were tested, however, the order of stimulus effectiveness was strikingly different: sucrose was the best stimulus, followed by HCl, NaCl, and QHCl. If both the anterior tongue and nasoincisor ducts are included, stimulation of taste receptors in the anterior oral cavity of the rat produces good responses to stimuli representing 3 of the 4 classical taste qualities: sweet, salty, and sour.

AB - The responses of 54 neurons to independent sapid stimulation of 4 taste receptor subpopulations associated with: (1) anterior tongue; (2) nasoincisor ducts; (3) soft palate; and (4) foliate papillae were recorded from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) of the rat. Neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the anterior oral cavity (anterior tongue or nasoincisor ducts) were located more rostrally in the NST than neurons responding to stimulation of receptor subpopulations in the posterior oral cavity (soft palate or foliate papillae). Half of the sampled neurons responded exclusively to stimulation of one receptor subpopulation with the remaining neurons responsive to stimulation of two or more receptor subpopulations. The most common pattern of convergence observed was between responses arising from stimulation of the taste buds on the anterior tongue and those associated with the nasoincisor ducts of the hard palate. The sensitivity of NST neurons to anterior tongue and nasoincisor duct stimulation with the 4 standard taste stimuli was determined. When stimulating the anterior tongue, the order of effectiveness was NaCl > HCl > sucrose > quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). When the nasoincisor ducts were tested, however, the order of stimulus effectiveness was strikingly different: sucrose was the best stimulus, followed by HCl, NaCl, and QHCl. If both the anterior tongue and nasoincisor ducts are included, stimulation of taste receptors in the anterior oral cavity of the rat produces good responses to stimuli representing 3 of the 4 classical taste qualities: sweet, salty, and sour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022588867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022588867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91642-2

DO - 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91642-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 3947995

AN - SCOPUS:0022588867

VL - 365

SP - 305

EP - 320

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 2

ER -